Mafia 93 - A Roccisi Summer - Over!

[Caboose]

caboose, why would you rather policy vote/lynch alvinz than pursue what you agree is a legitimate argument in favor of voting ogb?

Not a policy vote.

You'll see....

[roflcopter]

a purely academic question:

which of these two things benefits the town more?

a 2nd vote for a player based on policy

a 6th vote for a player based on gameplay

[roflcopter]

woof. i don't like korts' post 49. mostly the fact that he's deflating the ogb wagon by removing himself from it.

[roflcopter]

caboose, why would you rather policy vote/lynch alvinz than pursue what you agree is a legitimate argument in favor of voting ogb?

Not a policy vote.

You'll see....

oh really? please, do explain how voting for someone on the basis of agreeing with iaun's policy vote is not a policy vote.

[Korts]

woof. i don't like korts' post 49. mostly the fact that he's deflating the ogb wagon by removing himself from it.

I have found a better one. Seraphim presenting others' points as his own, labelling a completely normal reaction backtracking, and having general scummy tone is better than wanting players to identity-guess.

[Seraphim]

Korts: Of course the argument is bullshit. The question was intentionally loaded to provoke reactions. Plus, if I actually thought that the "backtracking" was scummy, I would have placed my vote there.

OGB still has yet to post anything of note besides fueling alt speculation which is useless which is why my vote is there.

rofl is probably town.

Caboose, please explain. If it's not a policy vote, what is it?

[roflcopter]

woof. i don't like korts' post 49. mostly the fact that he's deflating the ogb wagon by removing himself from it.

I have found a better one. Seraphim presenting others' points as his own, labelling a completely normal reaction backtracking, and having general scummy tone is better than wanting players to identity-guess.

i can't agree that there's any better place to vote until ogb actually starts participating. the fact that he's obviously following along enough to post useless crap here, and simultaneously has been posting in other threads, but can't seem to bring himself to actually be anything but a useless sack is impeding my ability to vote for anyone but him.

[Caboose]

caboose, why would you rather policy vote/lynch alvinz than pursue what you agree is a legitimate argument in favor of voting ogb?

Not a policy vote.

You'll see....

oh really? please, do explain how voting for someone on the basis of agreeing with iaun's policy vote is not a policy vote.

I'm not trying to get alvinz

lynched

I'm trying to see if he will break down under the pressure.

which of these two things benefits the town more?

a 2nd vote for a player based on policy

a 6th vote for a player based on gameplay

Depends on the circumstances.

[Korts]

Korts: Of course the argument is bullshit. The question was intentionally loaded to provoke reactions. Plus, if I actually thought that the "backtracking" was scummy, I would have placed my vote there.

Accusing players of things they didn't do (i.e. doing something scummy yourself) is only likely to provoke one kind of reaction--suspicion. You are being thick if you think otherwise.

OGB still has yet to post anything of note besides fueling alt speculation which is useless which is why my vote is there.

In the 14 minutes between this post of yours and the previous one OGB didn't post at all. Do you expect him to post every five minutes, and if not, what was the purpose of this comment?

[roflcopter]

caboose, thats still a policy vote. and i've never seen a policy vote actually succeed in applying real pressure to a player, because everyone knows its based on out of game reasons. policy voting players one considers to be bad in the face of perfectly good wagons replete with in game reasons is one of the more egregious forms of avoiding putting your vote anywhere meaningful.

[Korts]

woof. i don't like korts' post 49. mostly the fact that he's deflating the ogb wagon by removing himself from it.

I have found a better one. Seraphim presenting others' points as his own, labelling a completely normal reaction backtracking, and having general scummy tone is better than wanting players to identity-guess.

i can't agree that there's any better place to vote until ogb actually starts participating. the fact that he's obviously following along enough to post useless crap here, and simultaneously has been posting in other threads, but can't seem to bring himself to actually be anything but a useless sack is impeding my ability to vote for anyone but him.

I'd vote for scummy over anti-town any day of the week.

[roflcopter]

korts: are you saying ogb's actions so far are anti-town but not scummy?

[Korts]

He has made 3 posts. I see a tendency in the quality of his posting, but so far it is not a wide enough sample to dub it scummy per se.

[Seraphim]

Ah, but is it true suspicion or scummy faked suspicion/outrage? There's a difference and that's what I'm aiming for. Useless now, of course. But at this point in the game, it's all about reactions. These early game impressions are important and I want to take full advantage of them.

The purpose of the comment was simply restating the case against OGB.

[Caboose]

caboose, thats still a policy vote. and i've never seen a policy vote actually succeed in applying real pressure to a player, because everyone knows its based on out of game reasons. policy voting players one considers to be bad in the face of perfectly good wagons replete with in game reasons is one of the more egregious forms of avoiding putting your vote anywhere meaningful.

My vote is not based on out of game reasons. I vote in the hopes that either he will prove himself town or make a scum slip under pressure.

[Korts]

Ah, but is it true suspicion or scummy faked suspicion/outrage? There's a difference and that's what I'm aiming for. Useless now, of course. But at this point in the game, it's all about reactions. These early game impressions are important and I want to take full advantage of them.

I like how you blame the town for ruining your brilliant trap.

The OGB case didn't need restating, since it was made like half a page ago. Stop padding your posts with useless shit.

[Korts]

EBWOP:

since it was made like half a page

and 14 minutes

ago.

[charter]

I think Caboose, Seraphim, and OGB are all scumbuddies.

[Seraphim]

I'm not blaming the town at all. The foiling of the trap was of my own making.

[roflcopter]

i'm unconvinced on the seraphim-as-scum thing, but i like where charter's head is at

i also really don't buy korts now pseudo-defending ogb because there is "not enough to go on." sometimes one post is all it takes. arguing that he hasn't said enough to get a read on is some kind of fallacy.

[Seraphim]

i'm unconvinced on the seraphim-as-scum thing, but i like where charter's head is at

Oh, the irony.

[Mufasa]

well I would like to make a claim that I am here

[Korts]

rofl, if OGB consistently ignores the game, he is scummy. If he ignores it over the span of three posts, I don't see where he is all that damaging to town.

[charter]

Add Mufasa to that triangle, and I get you a scum quartet. Now to determine the number of scum in this game. This will be the challenging task.

[Seraphim]

well I would like to make a claim that I am here

...what?