Lynch All Lurkers Mafia! GAME OVER

Ether · Post Post #2400 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2009 4:53 pm

Day 4, Block 1, Votecount 1 wrote:9 Unvote (elvis_knits, Empking, image, Kinetic, MafiaSSK, ortolan, populartajo, Stephoscope, Xylthixlm)

9 alive; 5 to lynch.

Stephoscope · Post Post #2401 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2009 6:53 pm

Yosarian2 wrote:Roflcopter has been shot. He was a vanilla townie.

...wow. And I was so ready to build a case against rofl this day. Sorry for doubting you...

I too will confirm that q21/Kinetic is the third mason, and that we as masons have been useless.

ortolan · Post Post #2402 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2009 7:10 pm

You didn't need to confirm that.

At present before I've re-read I'm still happy to go with my original reads- image was pretty damn scummy. He may now make some further cases so we can have further opportunity to judge him.

There's no way I'll support an elvis_knits lynch and as far as I'm aware Xyl hasn't done anything scummy enough to support lynching him either. I'm tempted almost to think that Yos would have WIFOM'ed us with the masons and they might all in fact be pro-town, but I'm not sure. Empking is neutral- no indications of his alignment and he hasn't been as inquisitive as he usually is.

Actually what do people think of a massclaim? I somehow doubt we have any power-roles we'd want to keep secret at this point in the game and if we get no power-role claims apart from tajo it makes his tracker claim very suspect, because it implies that a mafia roleblocker was put in the setup whose ability can only work on

one

player, who happened to claim his ability unprompted on day one. I'm aware this is the sort of thing I might say as scum also, to frame tajo and/or out power roles, but it seems like it certainly should be strongly considered.

ortolan · Post Post #2403 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2009 7:37 pm

Oh and if anyone lurks past 72 hours they're still dying automatically- remember we've caught our two scum so far because 1) of implied intention to lurk and 2) actually lurking. We are definitely sticking to zero-tolerance. Masons- I would like if you'd paraphrase your chat discussion so far please (or check if you're actually allowed to just post it, but don't do so without mod clarification). I would like to know how many posts you've made and who has said what.

Kinetic · Post Post #2404 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2009 7:42 pm

ortolan wrote:Oh and if anyone lurks past 72 hours they're still dying automatically- remember we've caught our two scum so far because 1) of implied intention to lurk and 2) actually lurking. We are definitely sticking to zero-tolerance. Masons- I would like if you'd paraphrase your chat discussion so far please (or check if you're actually allowed to just post it, but don't do so without mod clarification). I would like to know how many posts you've made and who has said what.

When I joined as a mason they hadn't even finished a page yet. There may have been about 5 posts since then, none of them remotely helpful at all.

MafiaSSK · Post Post #2405 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2009 7:44 pm

Kinetic wrote:
ortolan wrote:Oh and if anyone lurks past 72 hours they're still dying automatically- remember we've caught our two scum so far because 1) of implied intention to lurk and 2) actually lurking. We are definitely sticking to zero-tolerance. Masons- I would like if you'd paraphrase your chat discussion so far please (or check if you're actually allowed to just post it, but don't do so without mod clarification). I would like to know how many posts you've made and who has said what.
When I joined as a mason they hadn't even finished a page yet. There may have been about 5 posts since then, none of them remotely helpful at all.

I have. I've tried to encourage us to work as a team and to help save my ass.

ortolan · Post Post #2406 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2009 7:54 pm

so what's the chain of discussion been like?

Xylthixlm · Post Post #2407 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2009 7:55 pm

MafiaSSK: It would have helped more if you had actually participated in the game you know

ortolan · Post Post #2408 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2009 7:58 pm

Who do the masons think is scummiest now?

MafiaSSK · Post Post #2409 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2009 8:01 pm

Xylthixlm wrote:MafiaSSK: It would have helped more if you had actually participated in the game you know

Meh. I challenged ,myself and couldn't complete the challenge.

Xylthixlm · Post Post #2410 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2009 8:26 pm

MafiaSSK wrote:
Xylthixlm wrote:MafiaSSK: It would have helped more if you had actually participated in the game you know
Meh. I challenged ,myself and couldn't complete the challenge.

You're lucky I can't be bothered to go to Colorado and beat you over the head with a foam bat.

Stephoscope · Post Post #2411 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2009 8:31 pm

I still have not been told how I could have, or can, play, with other daymasons who aren't confirmed.

ortolan · Post Post #2412 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2009 8:43 pm

despite initially believing them to be?

Empking · Post Post #2413 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2009 9:06 pm

Vote: MafiaSSK

ortolan · Post Post #2414 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2009 9:11 pm

^^ why?

Empking · Post Post #2415 (ISO) » Sat May 16, 2009 9:13 pm

ortolan wrote:^^ why?

He falseclaimed a post restriction in a non-gambitty way.

Stephoscope · Post Post #2416 (ISO) » Sun May 17, 2009 2:23 am

ortolan wrote:despite initially believing them to be?

MafiaSSK didn't see fit to post in the quicktopic for like a week initially.

You know, what the hell.

Vote: MafiaSSK

ortolan · Post Post #2417 (ISO) » Sun May 17, 2009 2:45 am

what do you think of image Stephy, MafiaSSK and Kinetic

elvis_knits · Post Post #2418 (ISO) » Sun May 17, 2009 3:50 am

I think image and tajo are scummiest, although lynching SSK is not really a bad idea.

I'd like to see massclaim at this point.

Worst case scenario is 4 scum left. 9 players, 5 town... if we make 2 mislynches today, scum win.

If there's 3 scum left, 9 players, 6 town, if we make 2 mislynches, scum make a nightkill for the win.

There's probably atleast 2 scum left, 9 players, 7 town, even with 2 mislynched today, and a NK, we still would get to see tomorrow.

Personally, I would think we have 2-3 scum left, so hopefully we are not in the worst case scenario. But it's very possible that today is lylo.

elvis_knits · Post Post #2419 (ISO) » Sun May 17, 2009 4:31 am

This is who is left:

4. Xylthixlm
5. image
8. MafiaSSK - mason
9. Empking
12. elvis_knits
13. q21Kinetic - mason
14. Stephoscope - mason
15. populartajo - tracker
17. ortolan

The order I would choose is:
image
Empking
Xyl
Ortolan
elvis

Although I would go for popcorn, with image going first.

Or any other method, really. I don't care.

Empking · Post Post #2420 (ISO) » Sun May 17, 2009 4:54 am

I'd prefer Popcorn.

elvis_knits · Post Post #2421 (ISO) » Sun May 17, 2009 5:33 am

I don't care but image should go first because he is the scummiest of the unclaimed.

MafiaSSK · Post Post #2422 (ISO) » Sun May 17, 2009 5:36 am

elvis_knits wrote:I don't care but image should go first because he is the scummiest of the unclaimed.

QFT

ortolan · Post Post #2423 (ISO) » Sun May 17, 2009 5:44 am

actually I would like to give tajo the opportunity to revise his claim, without any prejudice

tajo if you want to claim vanilla now we won't hold it against you

image · Post Post #2424 (ISO) » Sun May 17, 2009 8:28 am

Sorry, am quite busy this weekend, probably won't be able to do a reread or post a real case until later Tuesday or so, although I'll try to post non-content stuff to keep my lurk timer down. Quite surprised by rofl flipping town.

Elvis wrote: Worst case scenario is 4 scum left. 9 players, 5 town... if we make 2 mislynches today, scum win.

Careful here; if there are 4 scum and we make 1 mislynch today, we lose. We may be in LYLO already.