populartajo (1307) wrote:He has repeatedly rolefished
Fail. Im not rolefishing. You aparently softclaimed. The player that is leading the votes is the same player you think is town for reasons that arent clear
Leading the votes is not a good reason for someone being scummy, especially in this town.
populartajo (1307) wrote:explicitly asked for claims before players are at L-1
And this is bad why
It should be obvious why. The only reason you ask someone to claim is if they are definitely otherwise going to be lynched; and it's in the hope they happen to be a power-role- so that in some cases if the claim is believed another player can be lynched instead. You didn't follow accepted protocol and continued with the out-of-character role-fishing behaviour you've demonstrated all game; and asked for a claim when he was at L-4 i.e. when you did not have the town behind you to lynch him.
populartajo (1307) wrote:repeatedly focused on scummy rolefishing methods including asking for a mass-claim day one
trying to break the game means something to you?
More like trying to falsely gain townpoints/ learning who has a certain role you seek; under the (very, very likely incorrect) assumption the mod would allow the game to be easily broken by masslclaim
populartajo (1307) wrote:and is pretty much just naming as his suspect people who lurk and are easy to lynch bar me
My case on Looker is not that he is lurking. Fail. Dont you read?
Your case on Looker, now replaced by ThAdmiral, relied on the assumption that his play is not routinely anti-town, which for all the evidence I've seen, it is
And as of your "policy lynch" or should I say "scum list" in 1270, you name myself, Looker, and Riceballtail.
This was having previously applied a whole load of pressure to zwet and forced him to claim. From experience, those three (zwet, Riceballtail, Looker) would be the easiest to lynch in any game. In Sushi Mafia Riceballtail lurked a whole lot and could have been lynched rather easily.
You also have me. I suspect I'm on there because we have already seen the sheer number of sheep in this game who will probably still follow crappy wagons despite points like:
1) I opposed massclaim day one despite being perfectly capable of complying with it. If you were town and I were scum this would be nonsensical play.
2) Of the two flipped scum,
both
attacked me heavily day one.
3) I was second on the wagon, of the flipped scum.
According to tajo though, I've done "nothing pro-town at all" (LuL) (for reference he was actively trying to take votes away from the flipped scum and onto Looker, the paradigm easy target), and I'm still MeGa ScuMMy!!! I almost admire your audacity in just saying "NO NO ORT IS SCUM LOOK", but time spent admiring is time spent not getting you up on the gallows.
WLC dropped off the scumlist a bit for me when I realised he'd actively voted Shadow Knight day one, while tajo was still trying to take votes off the wagon.
I'm very interested to see if you keep going as hard after someone who can defend himself (ThAdmiral) now, tajo.
And I already clarified exactly why I believed zwet's claim, so unless you want another gone fishin' jpeg I think we can steer the conversation away from that topic.
