Open 131 - Nightless Vanilla (Over) before 767

[hewitt]

I'm tired of you again. I refuse to respond to you until you vote.

That's such a silly and immature response to my question. Instead of being childish why don't you instead ask me who I think is scummiest at this point? All I did was ask you a question White Castle.

[StrangerCoug]

Damn, White Castle, lose your temper much?

[skitzer]

Upon re-reading, although I still think that Skitzer is probable scum, there are four of them, and Wall-e looks like another, so:

Unvote; Vote: Wall-e

That's L-2, for the record.

See, this is what I mean about your reasonless voting. It seems as though you are just hopping on this bandwagon.

Seriously, do you people still want to play this game or not?

Calm down. Sometimes things have to go at their own pace. I'm sure will find a replacement, and hewitt, although he may not have voted yet, is at least playing the game.

I'm tired of you again. I refuse to respond to you until you vote.

I agree with hewitt and StrangerCoug on this statement. It's not really pro-town gameplay.

[White Castle]

Ooh, what's he going to do? Vote me?

[StrangerCoug]

Well, if your idea of responding to what you think is a crap case on you is acting like a three-year-old, be my guest. There are much more pro-town ways to go about it, however.

[hewitt]

Ooh, what's he going to do? Vote me?

Immaturity on zwets level right there. I asked a simple question, not threats or anything attached and you flipped out.

[Empking]

Pmub

[Wall-E]

Wall-E: Scummiest player?

Mmm. WC. I didn't like his policy lynch comment, and the flip-out is telling.

Unvote: Vote: White Castle

[Wall-E]

Ooh, what's he going to do? Vote me?

While I agreed with your refusal to talk to hewitt until he votes (It's pro-town to force other players to take sides) I think this post sounds like false bravado and is disrespectful in tone. He's daring hewitt to vote for him, which can't be a good sign.

[Wall-E]

I could easily be misreading things here. I rely on other people to tell me when sarcasm is sarcasm, a joke is a joke, and spite is spite. This looks like spitefulness in the face of a bit of late-day attention.

I could not even begin to choose four scum. I'm only really good at finding them one at a time and then working back to find the rest, sorry.

[StrangerCoug]

Actually, Wall-E, this is one of those times when I think you're right.

Unvote: Wall-E

and

FoS: White Castle

while I think about it.

[Wall-E]

I hope this is not one of the signs of the Apocalypse.

Who would you vote for right now if you were forced to decide, SC?

[StrangerCoug]

Probably White Castle for his recent attitude toward hewitt, which is a better lead in my opinion than your oblivion.

[hewitt]

I must say I'm also a little troubled with White Castle being uncooperative and hostile. I really don't understand it.

[White Castle]

I've tried my best to keep this game going. I've posted often, and I think with good content most of the time.

As SC knows, I cross replaced into a game in order to get a replacement into this one. So when farside flaked, I was and still am upset. She shouldn't play games with her level of commitment.

So I tried the only thing I could think of to get things going. I wanted to see if I could make hewit vote. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink.

hewitt, I'll repond to you now. The four scummiest people in my opinion are: Wall-E (who I'm voting for), Empking, millar, and lowell.

At this point, I think someone needs to be in a noose for this game to progress, or the game will die.

Mod - please impose a deadline.

This way if hewitt never votes, his non-vote would essentially be a vote for the deadlined-lynchee.

[hewitt]

Well I think you should learn from this then that you can't control other players in this game. You're not going to control my decisions on when to vote or not and I dislike the fact that you thought you were going to be successful in that.

But with that said I'm not a stubborn player in that I'm not going to vote. I do have difficulties on lynch 1 I'm a much better analyzer after the first lynch. If you could explain why those four are your choices for who you believe are the scummiest I will of course listen and take in your opinion.

[Netlava]

Hmm... I think at this point I would be repeating myself if I said that skitzer is still my top suspect. Anyways, I don't like revealing everything at once, but I feel bad for saying nothing, so here's a couple of more thoughts:

WC I initially thought was town, but had some doubts, but now I think is town again. B)

Hewitt should vote. Key word is should. But usually I see that people usually stick to these things pretty consistently, so w/e.

[Empking]

Ooh, what's he going to do? Vote me?

While I agreed with your refusal to talk to hewitt until he votes (It's pro-town to force other players to take sides) I think this post sounds like false bravado and is disrespectful in tone. He's daring hewitt to vote for him, which can't be a good sign.

TBH WC getting Hewitt to vote him would probably get WC to vote normally from then on.

[StrangerCoug]

This way if hewitt never votes, his non-vote would essentially be a vote for the deadlined-lynchee.

So is it that of everyone else not voting at the time. I unvoted to give myself time to think about you. You've had a hissy fit with hewitt, and once you realized you were engaging in an exercise in futility, you post this, which given past actions is leading me to believe you're setting hewitt up to fall should the deadline lynch be that of a townie.

Vote: White Castle

[White Castle]

This way if hewitt never votes, his non-vote would essentially be a vote for the deadlined-lynchee.

So is it that of everyone else not voting at the time. I unvoted to give myself time to think about you. You've had a hissy fit with hewitt, and once you realized you were engaging in an exercise in futility, you post this, which given past actions is leading me to believe you're setting hewitt up to fall should the deadline lynch be that of a townie.

Vote: White Castle

hewitt is special, he hasn't cast a vote the whole game except by accident. Everyone else is on record and allows us to scumhunt by looking into voting records.

Your vote is based on an appeal to emotion, that you know that I'm feeling. Your read is incorrect. I was admittedly upset at farside, not hewitt.

[StrangerCoug]

If you're upset at farside22, then why are you being abusive towards hewitt? I don't understand.

Mod: Possible V/LA next week. I'll tell you if I'll have access then.

[White Castle]

If you're upset at farside22, then why are you being abusive towards hewitt? I don't understand.

Mod: Possible V/LA next week. I'll tell you if I'll have access then.

Trying to get hewitt to vote is abusive? There is no connection between what farside did and me trying to get hewitt to vote.

You've got to admit that voting analysis is a valid scumhunting technique/tool. When someone doesn't vote, it impedes said analysis.

Either way, the mod hasn't posted in the replacement thread. I put this game at a 75% chance of getting abandoned.

[hewitt]

Voting analysis is not the ONLY scumhunting technique, there are so many other ways to analyze a player.

[White Castle]

Voting analysis is not the ONLY scumhunting technique, there are so many other ways to analyze a player.

You are handicapping other players from using said technique.

Have you ever tried using voting analysis before?

[Jazzmyn]

I've never flaked from a game ever, so I don't understand the rationale behind it.

So, I don't understand why farside is flaking from this game while simultaneously signing up for other games. Does anyone have any theories on this?

It's bloody annoying, that's for sure.

Regards,
Jazz