Yes. That makes sense, doesn't it? If there are two nightkills, I think at least one of them would have been on Yosarian2.Patrick wrote:Not sure what the second part has to do with first. You're saying he looks more suspicious because he wasn't nightkilled or something?
Incognito wrote:What are your thoughts on Ether's *alignment*?
But why would this implicate Yosarian2 as scum? The idea was that since Yosarian2 didn't die last night, the second kill seemed more likely to be an SK kill as opposed to a vig kill since it's thought that a vig would have just killed Yosarian2, the claimed Miller, last night. I think the only way you could be genuinely suspicious of Yosarian2 for the reasons of him not dying last night is if you thinkPost 785, skitzer wrote:Yes. That makes sense, doesn't it? If there are two nightkills, I think at least one of them would have been on Yosarian2.
Why so wishy-washy?Post 785, skitzer wrote:I haven't seen anything out of the ordinary, but I don't use meta, which is seeming what a lot of her case is. I can understand it though; her meta seems to be heavily convincing.
What? That dosn't make any sense at all. The scum would not kill me, because they would have thought they could get me lynched. Neither would a SK. A vig might, if he or she thought I was likely scum, or they might not. How does any of that reflect on my alignment?skitzer wrote:Yes. That makes sense, doesn't it? If there are two nightkills, I think at least one of them would have been on Yosarian2.Patrick wrote:Not sure what the second part has to do with first. You're saying he looks more suspicious because he wasn't nightkilled or something?
It's not an 'analysis', and I'm definately not being rushed this time. When I look at this thread, I'm usually at some of Ether's posts. Take of that what you will.Yosarian2 wrote:Anyway, I would also like to see an Ether claim, and am also willing to join that wagon.
Xdaamno: I would like to see that analysis soon; if you don't give one before Ether gets lynched, and she flips scum, you will look quite bad in my eyes.
I don't use meta because I feel that every game is individual, and I don't like basing off of other games. I haven't read up on the meta; I was just stating that others do find it convincing.Green Crayons wrote:So you don't use meta but you think the meta is convincing. But you won't use meta because...? Principled stand?
Incognito wrote:Why so wishy-washy?
[quote="Yosarian2]What? That dosn't make any sense at all. The scum would not kill me, because they would have thought they could get me lynched. Neither would a SK. A vig might, if he or she thought I was likely scum, or they might not. How does any of that reflect on my alignment?[/quote]Incognito wrote:But why would this implicate Yosarian2 as scum? The idea was that since Yosarian2 didn't die last night, the second kill seemed more likely to be an SK kill as opposed to a vig kill since it's thought that a vig would have just killed Yosarian2, the claimed Miller, last night. I think the only way you could be genuinely suspicious of Yosarian2 for the reasons of him not dying last night is if you think he is the potential SK. Do you believe that to be the case? If so, why?
Lots of linguistic cliches in her last few posts, such as this one. I think that's a very strong scum tell because townies are never complacent. So, yes, an Ether wagon looks very good to me.Ether wrote:Your 705 reads to me like you were aware of the softclaim. When did you catch it? (And yes, I do think you should have been more concerned with OGML than with Charter.)Post 731, Korts wrote:No.Ether wrote:Yo, Korts. Did you ever read that stuff you fell behind on?
I'm curious, but I'll live.Post 733, Incognito wrote:Ether, I know what you're trying to do here. You're seriously trying to get me to reveal the secret behind the AIM logs that Patrick and I have on your typical play and that'snotgonna happen.
Farscape and Big Love (claims here and here, respectively) are the games that caused me to shift my attitude on claimed protective roles. Suspicious ones are good at getting themselves out of the way without my help. I really don't like his sneaking around OGML, though--see above--and am annoyed that he survived at all.
I needed Korts's answer first.
Pfft.
My blitz fell through when it came out that Skitzer was behind the slow start. This put me back on Square 1 without anything to show for it, and I didn't get back into the mood.
It's a negative anyway. My activity owned in 707Post 745, Canary wrote:Followed shortly thereafter by, "I don't know what causes that reaction, though I'm pretty sure thick familiarity is a negative, if anything." Pretty funny. Thick familiarity is a negative when you're scum.most of itdespite coming in having played with q21 once and Mizzy twice, and not knowing anyone very well. Patrick replaced in later, but even he lurked. Impatience and frustration fuel me to dominate a low-profile game--in contrast, I'm more likely to be stunted and even replaced when almost everyone's competent.
Much as I think Ether is probably scum, this seems very manufactured to me. Do you really feel townies are never complacent? The thing that bothers me is that I don't think I've ever seen Ether react so apathetically to this much pressure as town. I've seen her do it as scum though.Xdaamno wrote:Lots of linguistic cliches in her last few posts, such as this one. I think that's a very strong scum tell because townies are never complacent. So, yes, an Ether wagon looks very good to me.
...I'm sorry, what?X wrote:I just realised that Ether might be going back and editing her posts to make them more compelling, though >.>
She may be concerned about looking scummy, and so is re-reading her posts and making them more presentable. This is different than complacency, and something I can imagine town doing. I think it's unlikely, though, so my vote stays.Green Crayons wrote:...I'm sorry, what?X wrote:I just realised that Ether might be going back and editing her posts to make them more compelling, though >.>
Oh?790, skitzer wrote:Incognito wrote:Why so wishy-washy?
I wasn't the one who thought it was convincing
Tunnel vision - yes, my play is consistent with scum. That's obvious. But it's also consistent with town. You're interpreting my behaviour as how you'd like to see it, rather than objectively.Yosarian2 wrote:If Ether dosn't say something change my mind in the near future, I expect to hammer her. We can take care of her obvious scum budddy Xdaamno tommorow.
