Open 131 - Nightless Vanilla (Over) before 767

[White Castle]

So just to get this straight you're voting Wall-E as a policy lynch because he's a liability?

It would only be a policy lynch if he's lynched.

I tried the same thing on millar13 for voting without a reason, but everyone else was content to live with it.

If everyone that did scummy things says "I'm not that dumb" as their defense and everyone buys it, how do we catch scum?

Anti-town behavior should be squashed.

So when do you think you'll get around to voting someone in an un-quotey kind of way?

[StrangerCoug]

Further, each mod is different and you could get yourself modkilled. Tell me, have you ever been modkilled and, if so, how many times?

What relevance does this have to the game?

[White Castle]

Further, each mod is different and you could get yourself modkilled. Tell me, have you ever been modkilled and, if so, how many times?

What relevance does this have to the game?

An example to show that the rules matter.

[hewitt]

So when do you think you'll get around to voting someone in an un-quotey kind of way?

When I think I've got a lead on scum.

[Rishi]

Vote Count – Page 17

Wall-E – 4 (Lowell, skitzer, StrangerCoug, White Castle)
Lowell – 3 (Mastin, millar13, Empking)
skitzer – 2 (Netlava, Jazzmyn)
millar13 – 1 (farside22)

Not voting: hewitt, Wall-E

With 12 alive, it takes 7 votes to lynch.

[Wall-E]

giggle

[Netlava]

Picked up prod, will post.

[Jazzmyn]

Upon re-reading, although I still think that Skitzer is probable scum, there are four of them, and Wall-e looks like another, so:

Unvote; Vote: Wall-e

That's L-2, for the record.

Regards,
Jazz

[hewitt]

Who are all the players you think are probable scum?

[Mastin]

End page six.

Still am suspicious of Lowell.
Also dislike the bandwagon on eternally-scummy millar (No different than Empking or Zwet in scumminess).

Disliking Wall-E's early, and later, posts, but at page six, they seem fine.

Making sure it's known:

On vacation (of sorts) from tomorrow to (at least) Sunday. I might not be able to get here 'til mid-Wednesday (12:30-ish).

[Netlava]

A D1 lynch of an anti-town person doesn't give information that is correct. But keeping an anti-town person throughout the length of the game until it becomes hurtful to the town is not good. At what day would you agree with a policy lynch if not D1 and D1 alone?

This is not a "campaign" of a policy lynch. Campaign is too strong of a word.

#324 Netlava: Way to post fluff. FoS: Netlava

The fluff was meant to be obvious. Not that I gain anything from posting it.

I wholeheartedly disagree with your statement. A good player would keep himself informed as to the game mechanics from the beginning. Further, each mod is different and you could get yourself modkilled. Tell me, have you ever been modkilled and, if so, how many times?

It's laughable that it's taken almost 400 posts for you to realize that this game is nightless. I've tried to tell you this before, yet it apparantly went over your head. You're not a "good player" if you are oblivious to the setup or random vote all of Day 1.

Earlier in this game you also responded to a conversation about scumbuddies that wasn't even directed at you.

Maybe it's just a difference in opinion, but these aren't things that I would consider scummy.

[Rishi]

farside22 has requested replacement.

[White Castle]

farside, if you read this you should have flaked earlier when you had a hard time keeping up. You've made it harder to find a replacement. In conjunction with Open 110, my meta on you is that you get yourself in too many games. Knock it off.

This game is just dragging on and on, and has been in day 1 for over a month.

Despite what Wall-E thought, there are no NKs.

At this rate, the game will end sometime in late 2010.

It takes 7 to lynch. Unless we lynch millar13, farside's vote is useless without a replacement. hewitt is waiting for divine intervention before voting.

That leaves 10 of us voting. Wall-E and Lowell are the top vote getters at present and probably won't vote themselves. That leaves 9 people to come up with 7 votes.

Seriously, do you people still want to play this game or not?

[Empking]

Wall-E: Scummiest player?

[StrangerCoug]

Seriously, do you people still want to play this game or not?

I certainly do, and this is not the first time I've been frustrated as heck about stuff like this.

[White Castle]

Unvote

Vote; Lowell

The Nigtless and Try Harder comments.

Wall-E: Scummiest player?

A better question is: Why you've left your vote on Lowell since April 6th?

Is the case still the best one you've got? Do something. You're part of the problem, not the solution. I can see why there was a discussion about policy lynching you.

[Empking]

Unvote

Vote; Lowell

The Nigtless and Try Harder comments.

Wall-E: Scummiest player?

A better question is: Why you've left your vote on Lowell since April 6th?

Is the case still the best one you've got? Do something. You're part of the problem, not the solution. I can see why there was a discussion about policy lynching you.

WC: Is that why you're voting Wall-E. Lowell is by far the way the scummiest but because he's been like that from near the begining you'll instead vote for relatively pro-town Wall-E.

That's a problem causing attitude.

[StrangerCoug]

Lowell is by far the way the scummiest but because he's been like that from near the begining you'll instead vote for relatively pro-town Wall-E.

*scoffs* Relatively pro-town? Wall-E hasn't the slightest clue as to what's happening given what he's been posting, and his scumhunting is spotty. I barely see a case on Lowell.

[Lowell]

I like that WC wants to speed things up, but I don't like the way he's slying trying to make it seem like wall-e and myself are the only options.

That said: let's all vote wall-e!

[White Castle]

WC: Is that why you're voting Wall-E. Lowell is by far the way the scummiest but because he's been like that from near the begining you'll instead vote for relatively pro-town Wall-E.

That's a problem causing attitude.

At least I'm posting reasons for voting that aren't about 300 posts old. Get off your butt and make us believe that "he's been like that from near the beginning". Stated differently, what has he done since 120 that's scummy?

He's at L-2 and his post is simply "giggle". He's posting in other places on MS. Is that "relatively pro-town"?

There are 4 scum in this game, and we can lynch them in any order. Who is your #2 through #4 suspect?

[hewitt]

Uh no White Castle actually you're not posting reasons for voting, you're just telling us that we should be voting for either Lowell or Wall-E since they're the top vote getters and you aren't providing much reasoning at all. I don't see a case on either that makes sense so far so of course I'm not going to vote for either of them at the moment.

White Castle who are your #1-4 suspects and give an in-depth answer as to why.

[Empking]

WC: Is that why you're voting Wall-E. Lowell is by far the way the scummiest but because he's been like that from near the begining you'll instead vote for relatively pro-town Wall-E.

That's a problem causing attitude.

At least I'm posting reasons for voting that aren't about 300 posts old. Get off your butt and make us believe that "he's been like that from near the beginning". Stated differently, what has he done since 120 that's scummy?

He's at L-2 and his post is simply "giggle". He's posting in other places on MS. Is that "relatively pro-town"?

There are 4 scum in this game, and we can lynch them in any order. Who is your #2 through #4 suspect?

Skitzer, Lowell, Farside

[White Castle]

Uh no White Castle actually you're not posting reasons for voting, you're just telling us that we should be voting for either Lowell or Wall-E since they're the top vote getters and you aren't providing much reasoning at all. I don't see a case on either that makes sense so far so of course I'm not going to vote for either of them at the moment.

White Castle who are your #1-4 suspects and give an in-depth answer as to why.

I'm tired of you again. I refuse to respond to you until you vote.

[White Castle]

WC: Is that why you're voting Wall-E. Lowell is by far the way the scummiest but because he's been like that from near the begining you'll instead vote for relatively pro-town Wall-E.

That's a problem causing attitude.

At least I'm posting reasons for voting that aren't about 300 posts old. Get off your butt and make us believe that "he's been like that from near the beginning". Stated differently, what has he done since 120 that's scummy?

He's at L-2 and his post is simply "giggle". He's posting in other places on MS. Is that "relatively pro-town"?

There are 4 scum in this game, and we can lynch them in any order. Who is your #2 through #4 suspect?

Skitzer, Lowell, Farside

So you are voting your #3 suspect? I thought Lowell was "by far the way scummiest" from post 416.

[Empking]

Skitzer, Wall-E, Farside