@Dr Pepper: Post 769 is true, and I'm sure dingo would agree. That's why he voted for me - he thought I was using a scum tactic. This is a self-evident fact.
You have disagreed that it is a scum tactic (and I agree with you there), but now you seem to be claiming that dingo never meant to imply that I was scummy. You've also said that dingo is "backpedalling" from this conclusion, but I just don't see it.
Now
this
is a better representation of the situation.
Dingo
(1) Percy voted, and was not willing to change it until the condition "excellent scumhunting" was met.
FACT
(2) Imposing this condition is a scum tactic.
OPINION
Therefore:
(3) Percy is using a scum tactic.
NECESSARY CONCLUSION
Dr Pepper
(A) dingo accused Percy of using a scum tactic in voting for ZONEACE/tubby.
FACT
(B) dingo may be scum with ZONEACE/tubby.
FACT
(C) dingo has not presented a good enough argument to show that (2) holds.
OPINION
Therefore:
(D) dingo may have other reasons for holding (2) beyond those currently stated.
POSSIBILITY
Therefore:
(E) dingo may be discouraging a vote on ZONEACE/tubby, for scummy reasons.
POSSIBILITY
Is this a fair and accurate summary of your positions?
Please answer this question, and then I'll do a re-read of the whole argument and look for possible scum/bus motives.
I'll also note that I
have
followed through with my strategy. I think it's important to not leave lurkers behind, and I don't want a lynch until tubby has had a chance to speak. When he does speak, I want him to be under a lot of pressure to generate good info for the town as fast as possible, and scrutinised while he does it. That's why my vote is (still) on him.