Mini 757 - South Park Mafia (Game Over)

[ZazieR]

@Zazier

- you had a whole lot to say a few days ago. You made a fuss about your role and taken a few pops at myself and DDD... you haven't posted here in 3 days, yet are still posting elsewhere. Why the sudden silence? Have you any follow-up to your previous posts? Who do you suspect right now? What do you think of my Ghostwriter case?

Depends on the games and the time I have in which I post.
I'll have to look for the responses that were made.
I suspect you (and think that DDD is your partner)
And I'll have to look at your case to see what I think of it.

May I also ask why I'm the only one to whom you've asked to look at your case against GW?

[ZazieR]

@caf19

- What do you think of Zazier's response to your concerns about her? Has she lessened these concerns?

I can understand putting fun stuff in a game, yeah. I'm not sure why you'd throw it in a long post, surrounded by a lot of serious points... maybe we just see things differently. It does also set the worrying precedent that Zazie can just retrospectively label anything as a joke if she starts getting suspected for it. We'll see if that becomes a problem. So I'd say I do still have some concerns, although they have been lessened a bit.

I've used smileys when I'm joking about something.
And the blonde thing was only said, because the one at whom it's targeted should read this game.

Other things can't be labeled as a joke.

[Spolium]

Spolium, your choices are Caf, Empking, and Wall-E. Who is most likely to be scum and who is least likely to be scum of the choices.

I will address this tomorrow, following a re-read.

Oh, and I was more interested in how you answered the question than what your answer was. That's all I have to say for now.

-------

And I'll have to look at your case to see what I think of it.

May I also ask why I'm the only one to whom you've asked to look at your case against GW?

Because five days ago you said:

I'll look later at your case against GW, Spolium.

Yet you have said nothing about it. Why did you feign interest in my case when you have no interest whatsoever? Don't you think Ghostwriter's actions warrant suspicion?

[ZazieR]

I always look at every case that's made as it might have merit.
I'm more surprised that you aren't pushing for a lynch on GW while you think he's the best lynch.

[Spolium]

I'm more surprised that you aren't pushing for a lynch on GW while you think he's the best lynch.

I'm letting the case stand on it's own merits for now, at least until GW responds.

[Debonair Danny DiPietro]

Woah, DDD. The scum are me and two others? That's interesting. Please expound to me upon why I am included in your shortlist?

I never stated or implied that was a shortlist of who I believe scum to be, it's a shortlist of people that I want Spolium's thoughts on however. Interesting how you made that leap though.

I was with you until you started to WIFOM up your post with all this, "Correct Answer:" stuff and talking about yourself as if unaware of your own alignment (?). Buzz buzz, that's bad stuff to hear.

Congratulations, you've unraveled the great mystery that I overthink most everything I do.

I still think it's a pointlessly hard question to answer, seriously try to come up with a decent response to, "Prove that you're town" without using a bucketful of stupid sounding cliches or presenting things that are just WIFOM.

[charter]

MOD: Any word from Ghostwriter?

No. The hunt for a RestFermata replacement is now the hunt for a Ghostwriter replacement...

Mod: What is your policy of confirming post restrictions?

I'm not going to.

Vote Count

Debonair Danny DiPietro - 1 (Empking)
ZazieR - 1 (Debonair Danny DiPietro)
GhostWriter - 1 (Spolium)

Not Voting (4)

Wall-E
ZazieR
GhostWriter
caf19


With 7 alive, it takes 4 to lynch!
Deadline is May 4th at midnight EST. This will not be extended for any reason.

RestFermata (Wendy Testaburger - Townie) Modkilled Day 2!

Win Condtion -

You win when all threats to the fourth grade are gone.

Oh how I love modkilling people! I plead that no one else drop...

[Spolium]

Timmmaaaaggh Brahaghag

Spolium, your choices are Caf, Empking, and Wall-E. Who is most likely to be scum and who is least likely to be scum of the choices.

Empking's voting behaviour D1 warrants a raised eyebrow as he seemed to be following whatever case was strongest at the time. One of his arguments against RBT - "

hasn't really been trying to hunt scum

" rings a little strange, since his laconic posting style doesn't exactly reveal much scumhunting on his part. However, I've noticed in recent weeks that this is basically how he posts as both town and scum so I'm wary of making too much of it.

Wall-E seems most likely town of the three, by merit of his enthusiasm in scumhunting and being willing to stick his neck out to get his message across (case in point: his criticism of my dej case).

TIMMMY! Tismdushbdj TIm TIm TIMTMIMTIMTIMTIMTIMTIMTIMTIMTIMTIMTIMTIMTIMT

[Empking]

Unvote

Vote: Spoilum

If the mod isn't going to confirm PRs then Spoilum has to be scum.

[Spolium]

Timmeh?

Have you got anything whatsoever to back that up?

Timamskhas.

[Empking]

Spoilum has been warned about breaking her post restriction.

Mod: What is your policy of confirming post restrictions?

I'm not going to..

[Spolium]

Okay, so that proves the mod will post in-thread warnings about PRs but will not confirm his PR policy.

How does this make me scum? Try to answer without playing

out-guess the mod

.

[Wall-E]

I agree that Spolium has been warned by the mod to utilize a PR and that it is largely evident that he is not lying about said PR. DDD has not done anything that I feel is overtly evil enough to lynch on this page or in the next one as of yet. ZazieR needs to give some love to the thread. I'll revote her very soon if she does not.

Spolium: Did that answer your question?

[Wall-E]

And actually, if you ARE lying about it Spolium, he would be trying to play out-guess-YOU.

[Empking]

Okay, so that proves the mod will post in-thread warnings about PRs but will not confirm his PR policy.

How does this make me scum? Try to answer without playing

out-guess the mod

.

The mod has said he won't confirm PRs. He confirmed your "PR". Therefore, you do not have a PR. Therefore you're lying. You want admit you're lying. Therefore you're scum.

[Wall-E]

Okay, so that proves the mod will post in-thread warnings about PRs but will not confirm his PR policy.

How does this make me scum? Try to answer without playing

out-guess the mod

.

The mod has said he won't confirm PRs. He confirmed your "PR". Therefore, you do not have a PR. Therefore you're lying. You want admit you're lying. Therefore you're scum.

A refusal to admit to lying is not lying, nor is it a scumtell imperically. If that were the case, I could turn you into scum by deeming you such, which is a logical fallacy.

[Spolium]

Timmmeeeehhhh TImmy.

@Empking - Earlier you said

Mod confirming a PR is a scum power role not a town power role.

which is apparently the root of your skepticism of my PR.

Have you considered why the mod grant scum the ability to call for a fake in-thread PR warning then state that he refuses to confirm PRs? Does that make any sense whatsoever? What is more likely to be the case is that an in-thread warning for a PR breach is part of his PR policy, but explicitly confirming a PR isn't, so there's some conflict there.

Even if you disregard that, you have basically taken two apparently contradictory statements from the mod and chosen which one you think is true. Why pick that one over the other?

Timmyyyyyyyy

[Empking]

Timmmeeeehhhh TImmy.

@Empking - Earlier you said

Mod confirming a PR is a scum power role not a town power role.

which is apparently the root of your skepticism of my PR.

Have you considered why the mod grant scum the ability to call for a fake in-thread PR warning then state that he refuses to confirm PRs? Does that make any sense whatsoever? What is more likely to be the case is that an in-thread warning for a PR breach is part of his PR policy, but explicitly confirming a PR isn't, so there's some conflict there.

The latter makes no sense.

Even if you disregard that, you have basically taken two apparently contradictory statements from the mod and chosen which one you think is true. Why pick that one over the other?

Timmyyyyyyyy

The first being a lie is BM, the second being a lie is being a B.

[Kmd4390]

Mykonian replaces GhostWriter

[mykonian]

I?

well, guess I'll have to.

[caf19]

I?

well, guess I'll have to.

Lulz... thanks for replacing.

[mykonian]

O, and while I'm here: scum lurked in the first six pages, and caf19 is on this moment my most serious target, based on interactions with Dejkha.

[mykonian]

page 8, that is it for today, I'm not capable of reading it well anymore

[Spolium]

Timmmaahyahyha TImmy! blaaargh

Have you considered why the mod grant scum the ability to call for a fake in-thread PR warning then state that he refuses to confirm PRs? Does that make any sense whatsoever? What is more likely to be the case is that an in-thread warning for a PR breach is part of his PR policy, but explicitly confirming a PR isn't, so there's some conflict there.

The latter makes no sense.

The idea of a mod-assigned scum ability which can be directly disproven by a simple question to the mod makes even less sense, so I'm in favour of the latter.

Even if you disregard that, you have basically taken two apparently contradictory statements from the mod and chosen which one you think is true. Why pick that one over the other?

The first being a lie is BM, the second being a lie is being a B.

Please explain what you mean by this.

Haaargh TIMMY! Heh. Hdundf TIIIIIMMMMMYYY

[charter]

To clarify, If I warn someone of breaking it, then they obviously have one. I'm not clarifying anything further than issuing warnings to people.

Don't really see how this is confusing, but I've gotten PM's about it.