Open 131 - Nightless Vanilla (Over) before 767

[Netlava]

Netlava post 68: So you don't like random votes but you will do BW votes??

Just putting this out there that this feels a bit underhanded to me. Like a cheapshot scum would make.

[Empking]

YES Empking, that is EXACTLY what I was saying, GOOD JOB.



*Dripping with sarcasm in case anybody couldn't figure that out*

Then what were you saying?

[millar13]

Disliking random votes, but doing BW is something that is understandable. And is neither scummy or towny as is totally dependent on the situation.

[Jazzmyn]

Jazz: post 63 Lowell said that comment before you voted why did you just notice it then?

Not true. I voted for him in post 47 around midnight; he made his explanatory comment in post 49 the next morning; I unvoted him for the reasons noted in my next post when I got back on that night, #63.

Why don't we just ask farside? farside, were you serious about policy-lynching Empking?

I am a little surprised you failed to notice that I asked her to answer this back in my post 299.

Interesting that she didn't answer my post but she did answer yours. I get a bad feeling from both of you. I am happy with my vote at present. Wall-e and Empking are also giving me bad vibes, but it seems they always do, regardless of alignment.

That said, I agree that nobody should be lynched before the replacement players have had the opportunity to get into the game and offer their insights.

Regards,
Jazz

[hewitt]

YES Empking, that is EXACTLY what I was saying, GOOD JOB.



*Dripping with sarcasm in case anybody couldn't figure that out*

Then what were you saying?

I said that lynching an anti-town player D1 is more beneficial than keeping them around until they become a hindrance to the town. The question at the end was to everybody really.

[Empking]

YES Empking, that is EXACTLY what I was saying, GOOD JOB.



*Dripping with sarcasm in case anybody couldn't figure that out*

Then what were you saying?

I said that lynching an anti-town player D1 is more beneficial than keeping them around until they become a hindrance to the town. .

So you were saying we should lynch you.

[Wall-E]

Posting to post.

[Lowell]

lurkers need to be awakened, with votes if necessary.

[White Castle]

I'm back from V/LA.

I wonder if we're better off not posting much until we get two replacements. It might be easier to get replacements for a 14 page game.

[farside22]

Netlava post 68: So you don't like random votes but you will do BW votes??

Just putting this out there that this feels a bit underhanded to me. Like a cheapshot scum would make.

I don't understand the difference.
I personally don't really go for the BW votes because it doesn't really do anything day 1 page 2 in my book.
So to me random voting means voting and joking, but sometimes I find scum random vote poorly but BW vote typically. Just something I notice.

[hewitt]

Empking if you're saying I'm an anti-town player then fine, go ahead and vote me, whatever.

[Empking]

Empking if you're saying I'm an anti-town player then fine, go ahead and vote me, whatever.

I believe in voting scummy players.

[hewitt]

Do you think that I'm scummy?

[Empking]

Do you think that I'm scummy?

No.

[hewitt]

Yet you think I'm anti-town? Please explain how I'm anti-town and cite examples in this game.

[Wall-E]

Unvote: Vote: hewitt

for being scum.

Thanks Empking! Great reasoning!

[hewitt]

I don't understand what's going on. Love it when people vote without giving reasons behind it.

[Wall-E]

Some people sometimes lynch Empking.

I like to do whatever he does sometimes.

How do you feel about having two votes on you like that?

[hewitt]

Some people sometimes lynch Empking.

I like to do whatever he does sometimes.

How do you feel about having two votes on you like that?

...Not, really, concerned? I mean the votes don't make much sense so there's not really anything I can say about it until there's further explanation.

[Rishi]

Vote Count – Page 14

Lowell – 3 (Adam Smith, millar13, Empking)
millar13 – 2 (farside22, lixyl)
skitzer – 2 (Netlava, Jazzmyn)
Wall-E – 2 (Lowell, skitzer)
hewitt – 1 (Wall-E)

Not voting: hewitt, White Castle

With 12 alive, it takes 7 votes to lynch.

[Empking]

Hewitt, you're anti-toewn because you push PLs and don't scum hunt. You know the first one's true and I can't prove the second.

[hewitt]

How have I pushed a policy lynch this game?

[Empking]

You've been pushing that we have a policy lynch, yes.

[hewitt]

I asked you to explain how Empking. That answer doesn't answer my question.

[Empking]

I asked you to explain how Empking. That answer doesn't answer my question.

Read it wrong.

By posting about how we need to poliy lynch.