Pie E7- (Open 129): Game Over before 762

[hewitt]

My bad zwets wasn't lynched he was killed that night (which is no better).

[Empking]

I feel like banging my head to a wall...

I'll make it clearer, If I attacked you personally and pretend that was a case then it would be Ad Hom.

No it wouldn't.

The fact that its wrong though, does.

This quote resumes everything. You don't give reasoning for what you say. You seem to believe you hold the Holy Truth and everybody else has to agree with whatever you say and can not doubt your play.

Yes I did. If your case was true you would be able to give proof.

[alexhans]

No It wouldn't what? What are you trying to say? Stop with the short meaningless answers!

You keep going again and again at the same... But you only ask me to give proof on you. You don't give proof yourself or ask others to give proof on their cases. Wich suggest too much defensiveness.

@kieraen: What game are you talking about?

[Empking]

No It wouldn't what? What are you trying to say? Stop with the short meaningless answers!

Well its respond to your statement, maybe that's a clue...

You keep going again and again at the same... But you only ask me to give proof on you. You don't give proof yourself or ask others to give proof on their cases. Wich suggest too much defensiveness.

I give proof when asked.

You don't (because you're unable to).

[alexhans]

I feel like banging my head to a wall...

I'll make it clearer, If I attacked you personally and pretend that was a case then it would be Ad Hom.

No It wouldn't what? What are you trying to say? Stop with the short meaningless answers!

Well its respond to your statement, maybe that's a clue...

Ok. Analize what you wrote. You're saying that if I personally attack you and pretend a case on you it's not ad hom. That's what you're saying with your answer. Although I don't think that's what you wanted to write. Pay attention. You just dismiss whatever I say in less than 2 minutes without logically refuting it (in a 1 liner). What you wrote doesn't make sense because it would dismiss any vote you made argumenting ad hom.


I don't think no one else thinks you either gave proof or really scum hunted. You just went for Wall-e for lurking and for me for accusing you. Your signature should be stubborn as hell.

[Empking]

I feel like banging my head to a wall...

I'll make it clearer, If I attacked you personally and pretend that was a case then it would be Ad Hom.

No It wouldn't what? What are you trying to say? Stop with the short meaningless answers!

Well its respond to your statement, maybe that's a clue...

Ok. Analize what you wrote. You're saying that if I personally attack you and pretend a case on you it's not ad hom. That's what you're saying with your answer. Although I don't think that's what you wanted to write. Pay attention. You just dismiss whatever I say in less than 2 minutes without logically refuting it (in a 1 liner). What you wrote doesn't make sense because it would dismiss any vote you made argumenting ad hom.


I don't think no one else thinks you either gave proof or really scum hunted. You just went for Wall-e for lurking and for me for accusing you. Your signature should be stubborn as hell.

And Alexhans lies again.

[alexhans]

That's all? I wrote what I wrote in 3:40 you posted 3:41... (the minimum time to fast read it and press the quote button and write "And Alexhans lies again")...

Seeing how you like latin-named fallacies I'll give you what you're doing:
Ad Nauseam.

But the worst thing is that its unexplained Ad nauseam...

[Empking]

That's all? I wrote what I wrote in 3:40 you posted 3:41... (the minimum time to fast read it and press the quote button and write "And Alexhans lies again")...

Seeing how you like latin-named fallacies I'll give you what you're doing:
Ad Nauseam.

But the worst thing is that its unexplained Ad nauseam...

It takes two to tango.

(You're going to ask "What tango?" aren't you."

[alexhans]

NO

See ya. I'm hoping that other players may give their input about what has been going on. I guess I'll have to make a re-read of the whole game and see what I can conclude.

[alexhans]

EBWOP: I live in the country where the tango was invented: Bs.As. Argentina.

[zwetschenwasser]

I'm banging my head against the wall that is Empking.

[fuzzylightning]

Vote Count #11

zwetschenwasser: 2 (dejkha, Wall-E)

Empking: 1 (hasdgfas)
alexhans: 1 (Empking)


Not Voting: zwetschenwasser, hewitt, alexhans

With 7 alive, it takes 4 to lynch.

I have set a deadline for this day as next Monday April 27, 2009 at 9 PM EDT

If there is not a clear majority at deadline then the day will end in a no lynch

[dejkha]

Ok people, can we get some votes going? Alex, I thought you said you were already voting Emp (or did you unvote?).

[alexhans]

I unvoted due to the cop claim. If there are no counter claims I think it's safe to assume he is telling the truth.

[dejkha]

I unvoted due to the cop claim. If there are no counter claims I think it's safe to assume he is telling the truth.

Oh, I didn't see that. Go figure. Not only was the cop role wasted on Emp, but he claims with no reason because his desire to be killed before Day 2 is apparently even larger than usual.

LK, how could you do this to us? And saying you picked the roles at random is no excuse!

[alexhans]

He WAS at L-1 mind you. But I too have the feeling that it was wasted on him. He could've defended himself earlier and shown signs of scumhunting to avoid more votes and the subsequent claim.

So dej... what was your case on Zwets again?

[dejkha]

I don't remember at the moment. I stopped caring much for this game when you and Emp went on with your endless babble and it didn't look like it was going to stop [no one (that means you, hewitt) try to comment on how its the same with me, because it's not]. I'll go back and check later, but if I remember correctly, I've restated it a couple times.

[Empking]

I unvoted due to the cop claim. If there are no counter claims I think it's safe to assume he is telling the truth.

Oh, I didn't see that. Go figure. Not only was the cop role wasted on Emp, but he claims with no reason because his desire to be killed before Day 2 is apparently even larger than usual.
!

I was L-1 and Zwet still hadn't voted me.

[zwetschenwasser]

Empking, please tell us your investigation results.

[dejkha]

It's Day One, smart one.

[zwetschenwasser]

It was an attempted trap, scumone.

[dejkha]

If someone else said it, I may've believed that, but since you said it, I highly doubt it. Not to mention it was a horrible trap because if he was fake claiming, his mind would have made him remember who he killed on night one (which there hasn't been yet).

[hasdgfas]

If someone else said it, I may've believed that, but since you said it, I highly doubt it. Not to mention it was a horrible trap because if he was fake claiming, his mind would have made him remember who he killed on night one (which there hasn't been yet).

so zwet can't do something useful? That's silly.

[dejkha]

No, it's really not.

[zwetschenwasser]

Unvote; Vote: dejkha

I thought you were the one that insisted that Empking was stupid.