Timmy? Hrrrmgh Timmeh. Jaaaargh! Haah.
ZazieR wrote:It was some 3 days until deadline, a new candidate for a lynch had to be found in the wake of Dej's claim (when there were no other major candidates), RBT was acting suspiciously and not putting much effort into defending herself. I gave her a reasonable amount of time in which to do so, then placed my vote as per the ultimatum.
Exactly. So it's strange that you didn't join the case you made against RBT. We had to find somebody else. During this time, you let other players jump on the wagon. Easy way for you to stay out of it.
I
did
join the case which I made on RBT. I placed the fifth vote.
Put simply, I was conscious of the fact that RBT hadn't said a lot in her defence, so I provided a list of reasons for which I would vote her and suggested that she put some effort into defending herself. She didn't, so I placed my vote as I said I would.
Now, kindly explain why you're pushing the idea that I didn't follow up on my case
when I clearly did
.
ZazieR wrote:You probably did it somewhere already, but please explain your point into asking who seemed the least scummy to another player?
Because Caf struck me as most town at the time, so I found his input in that regard valuable.
ZazieR wrote:What we know so far is there is a mafia team called the "Sixth Grade Wannabes" and that Tweek was one of them. Tweek is normally a fairly "innocent" character and suffers a great deal due to his caffeine-induced skittishness and a lack of courtesy from his peers, so the earlier assessment that charter wouldn't assign obvious "bad" characters as mafia due to roles not being clear cut was, evidently, correct.
Not true. Won't say more about that.
For the record, I worded that poorly. I didn't mean that charter would
completely
avoid putting "bad" characters on the scum team, but rather that scum team would not necessarily be made up of regular antagonists.
ZazieR wrote:On the flipside, however, we also know that roles and flavour are matched to an extent (i.e. Kenny died, Kyle is fairly smart and has helped with a high profile investigation in the series, Mr. Mackey ended up being weak doc which I had previously suggested was a possibility in terms of role allocation). I would imagine scum have much more to gain from a nameclaim than town would right now, so FoS Zazier
So because it counted for three players, it counts for all? But didn't you just say that it didn't count for Tweek?
My comment on Tweek was regarding his place on the scum team. Tweek is not a regular antagonist in the cartoon, so it was clear that scum would not be easily identifiable through a nameclaim, rendering a nameclaim less useful.
My comment on those three characters related to
a link between flavour and role
, which is different. It made some degree of sense for those characters to have those roles. This has been eveident for a while now, so IMO a push for a nameclaim is tantamount to power-role fishing.
ZazieR wrote:And for me it doesn't count as well.
Wait, didn't you say that you "won't say more about that"? Please make up your mind; If you have something useful to contribute, please do so instead of doing a half-arsed skim of the thread and declaring me to be scummy.
ZazieR wrote:- Determining what certain players thought of other players (duh)
- Hopefully spurring players to have a closer look at someone they may have overlooked
- Now you know
- And knowing is half the battle
- GI JOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOE
Says the player who has been less active during day 2 and followed other players their cases during day 2.
How has this got anything to do with my request for analysis? I explained my activity in my last post to you. I'm sure you can do better than just parrot an out-of-context point made by someone else.
ZazieR wrote:Besides, what's the point in asking about their thoughts on a random player picked by you, then those who they suspect?
Ah, so you assume my picks were random?
Timmamaham,,,,ahasjanegfgwuhrtiuew. Tim.
Here it comes:
