Pie E7- (Open 129): Game Over before 762

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #350 (ISO) » Sat Apr 11, 2009 10:27 am

Respond to me, please.

Wall-E · Post Post #351 (ISO) » Sat Apr 11, 2009 12:05 pm

zwetschenwasser wrote:
Wall-E wrote:Why my vote was not OMGUS: You failed to tell me what L-? I was at. I maintain that you didn't even know at the time. That's why I'm voting for you.
How is that a scumtell? I couldn't care less what L-? you were (or are).

It's anti-town which can be (and in this case, is) a scumtell, imho.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #352 (ISO) » Sun Apr 12, 2009 6:50 am

I WANT you lynched. Therefore, I don't care what L-? you are.

fuzzylightning · Post Post #353 (ISO) » Sun Apr 12, 2009 7:13 am

Vote Count #7

Wall-E: 2 (hasdgfas, zwetschenwasser)
zwetschenwasser: 2 (dejkha, Wall-E)

Not Voting: (alexhans, hewitt, Empking)

With 7 alive, it takes 4 to lynch.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #354 (ISO) » Sun Apr 12, 2009 7:27 am

Well, would you look at that?

hewitt · Post Post #355 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2009 5:19 am

I'm going to...

Vote: Empking

To me, he's flying unusually low in this game for him to be town. Even though I don't find him all that helpful I feel as if he usually posts much more then he has.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #356 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2009 5:37 am

What are your thoughts on Wall-e?

hewitt · Post Post #357 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2009 5:59 am

zwetschenwasser wrote:What are your thoughts on Wall-e?

Honestly, I'm not sure.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #358 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2009 6:24 am

How about me?

hewitt · Post Post #359 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2009 6:33 am

zwetschenwasser wrote: How about me?

Again, I just don't know.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #360 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2009 6:48 am

Noncommitalness is a scumtell.

hewitt · Post Post #361 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2009 6:49 am

Well then I apologize for being clueless zwets but that's the way it is right now.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #362 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2009 6:50 am

APPEAL TO EMOTION!

Unvote; Vote: hewitt

hewitt · Post Post #363 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2009 6:52 am

Yeah, explaining where my head is at right now is so scummy...

By the way that was dripping with sarcasm if you couldn't tell.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #364 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2009 6:55 am

MORE ATE!

hasdgfas · Post Post #365 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2009 6:56 am

zwetschenwasser wrote:APPEAL TO EMOTION!
Unvote; Vote: hewitt

what?

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #366 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2009 7:01 am

Exactly!

hasdgfas · Post Post #367 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2009 7:04 am

zwetschenwasser wrote:Exactly!

zwet, what are you on right now? nobody understands what you are talking about except you, and I'm not even sure about that one.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #368 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2009 7:09 am

hewitt wrote:Well then I apologize for being clueless zwets but that's the way it is right now.

Blatant ate.

hewitt · Post Post #369 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2009 7:12 am

zwetschenwasser wrote:
hewitt wrote:Well then I apologize for being clueless zwets but that's the way it is right now.
Blatant ate.

How?

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #370 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2009 7:25 am

You try to make me feel sorry for you.

hewitt · Post Post #371 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2009 7:33 am

Uh definitely not zwets, nice try though.

Wall-E · Post Post #372 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2009 8:23 am

It is an appeal to emotion, actually. Not saying you're unsure, but apologizing for it.

Unvote: Vote: hewitt

hewitt · Post Post #373 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2009 8:25 am

Haha I can't believe people actually think I'm not being sarcastic when I apologize.

Wall-E · Post Post #374 (ISO) » Mon Apr 13, 2009 10:21 am

Uhuh.

Look here: I have no sense of sarcasm, jokes or someone being facetious. If you don't clearly label your comments as such I will assume the worst. It's a survival tactic I use considering my condition.