tajo wrote:
Is it because I brought something new to the table that has the potential to break the game if done well the only reason that Im scum?
I'm not sure whether you are scum or not. I accept that bringing up the topic of mass claiming is not necessarily inherently scummy, and in this game has birthed a pretty healthy discussion. But I'm not liking how your proposal reasoning has
evolved
when faced with opposition. Your initial proposal was:
tajo wrote:
name mass claiming for the win?
Easily interpreted as "I think we should name mass claim". No indication here that you are anything but in favor of doing this. for the win.
tajo wrote:
The other game, we had a situation to prevent name massclaim. Princess Peach could get captured by scum giving them an autowin if they could keep her for a night with no killing Bowser. Now we dont have it and I strongly believe that Lawrencelot put the good guys in a side and the bad guys in the other, like in the other game.
More explanation of reasoning out why you are in favor of a mass name claim. Then Rule #13 is pointed out. Various votes. So then your expressed opinion changes:
tajo wrote:
I NEVER said it was a good idea. Im evaluating it right now and waiting for everybody's opinions on this.
tajo wrote:
why the vote when I have been CLEAR in express that I DONT support name massclaiming.
No, you're not being clear, which is what I'm now pointing out. Your proposal went from this:
tajo wrote:
name mass claiming for the win?
...to this...
tajo wrote:
Therefore, I wanted to evaluate the possibility of name massclaiming. Im not in favor or against it, IM JUST EVALUATING IT with the town.
Your statements aren't consistent, and you look like a flip-flopper. You shouldn't be terribly surprised to have a few votes on you.
Men's evil manners live in brass; their virtues we write in water.