Mini 773- Welcome to Lynchville! Perfection! (Over)

[alexhans]

Vote ppp973

for trying to vote early to confuse things and then not voting anyone.

[ChiefSkye4]

Vote ppp973

You know your vote doesn't count right?

[alexhans]

Vote ppp973

You know your vote doesn't count right?

It would be an excellent way to find out scum if it did...

Imagine
Scum 1 (1) ppp973
Scum2 (2) ppp973

I'd know who to lynch...

[PieIsPopcorn]

Vote ppp973

You know your vote doesn't count right?

ppp already had two votes for his behavior. Why did you feel the need to add a third on, for the exact same reasoning? Reeks of opportunism.

Vote: ChiefSkye4

[LesterGroans]

Anyway, I'm gonna

unvote

my fake nonexistent vote and ....

Vote: ChiefSkye4

[cateraction]

Third vote is opportunistic? Really? That's a stretch.

[PieIsPopcorn]

Third vote is opportunistic? Really? That's a stretch.

I don't particularly believe so, when it's all on a single action. One or two votes is in my opinion warranted pressure, but it feels like another vote doesn't contribute anything that the first two didn't. In addition, I would like you to note the tone and content of each of these votes.

Vote: ppp973

for making a useless "vote" that seems to be sucking up to the town.

Vote ppp973

for trying to vote early to confuse things and then not voting anyone.

These two votes are based on legitimately "scumtells", and at the very least seem to be an attempt to draw information from the player, and seem to be non-random votes. Meanwhile, Chief's vote,

Vote ppp973

You know your vote doesn't count right?

While the first two votes were relatively serious and were to draw pressure and information, this vote is just... there. It doesn't particularly seem to be placed for any particular reason. (Yes, I know, RVS, but it's placed on a player that had already recieved pressure for his actions.) Thusly, in my opinion, it warranted some pressure via my vote.

Also, it's PAGE 2. Don't expect airtight cases.

Anyway, I'm gonna

unvote

my fake nonexistent vote and ....

Vote: ChiefSkye4

Any particular reason for the vote?

[LesterGroans]

No, not at this point ... I probably wouldn't have chose Chief if I knew that he had a vote on him(same post time), but I'm fine with it where it is for now. Pressure on a couple of players gives us more information.

[Light-kun]

Vote Brian

I f*cking hate that damn raisin. Yes, I'm in a bad mood, go away.

[afatchic]

Your very first vote count, for the sake of having one near the top of every page…

ppp973-(3)- Archaist, alexhans, ChiefSkye4
ChiefSkye4-(2)-PieIsPopcorn, LesterGroans
alexhans-(1)-BrianMcQueso
BrianMcQueso-(1)-Light-kun

Not voting-(5)-ppp973, RedCoyote, cateraction, Cream147, Kublia Khan,

With 12 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.

Mod-Note: I will usually try to put the leading vote getter on top for your convenience. So when it gets close to deadline, the player on top gets lynched.

I didn’t put this in the Rules, so I’m about to go add it, but in the situation of a tie at deadline, the player who gets to that number first will be the one lynched.

Vote the mafia

You don't know how close i came to turning this into a self-vote for fun. I didn't figure that would be very nice of me to do, so i decided not to though.

[Kublai Khan]

I have experience playing with ppp973. Voting for him is the best Day 1 action for town.

[PieIsPopcorn]

I have experience playing with ppp973. Voting for him is the best Day 1 action for town.

Looking at ppp's past game, I see your point. However, if you're for an early ppp bandwagon, why aren't you voting him?

[RedCoyote]

Vote: Light-kun

for confusing the former 7-Up mascot Spot with a California Raisin.

[ppp973]

I have experience playing with ppp973. Voting for him is the best Day 1 action for town.

Kublai Khan I see I do not act correctly.

I wonder why to people act so differently from my mafia sites.

What gives?

So who's mafia.

Unvote, vote to lynch A mafiaso

Shessh I was kiddding, someone kept doing that one this sites I was playing at so I did it here

[alexhans]

Third vote is opportunistic? Really? That's a stretch.

I agree... I'm thinking that it fishes for reactions more than starts a bandwaggon... Who is gonna call him off for that...

These two votes are based on legitimately "scumtells", and at the very least seem to be an attempt to draw information from the player, and seem to be non-random votes.

Wrong. My vote wasn't based on a scumtell. It's a random vote but I always give it a reason so we can maybe get a response.

Also, it's PAGE 2. Don't expect airtight cases.

That's what I meant.

No, not at this point ... I probably wouldn't have chose Chief if I knew that he had a vote on him(same post time), but I'm fine with it where it is for now. Pressure on a couple of players gives us more information.

You wouldn't vote for someone who already has a vote? why? you think it can lead to a bandwaggon to fast or what

Unvote, vote to lynch A mafiaso

Shessh I was kiddding, someone kept doing that one this sites I was playing at so I did it here

Yeah... well... don't do it because I almost screamed when i saw your vote. A scream of annoyance.

[LesterGroans]

You wouldn't vote for someone who already has a vote? why? you think it can lead to a bandwaggon to fast or what

No, I don't think anyone this early is going to be lynched because of a bandwagon, but it was just an arbitrary vote and I probably would have chosen someone else if I knew there was a vote for him right above me anyway.

[Kublai Khan]

I have experience playing with ppp973. Voting for him is the best Day 1 action for town.

Looking at ppp's past game, I see your point. However, if you're for an early ppp bandwagon, why aren't you voting him?

Because I'm not really sold on the utility of policy lynches. Plus I'm sure he's bound to dig himself into a hole sooner than later.

BTW - What's with the over-aggressive questioning during the random vote phase?

[LesterGroans]

BTW - What's with the over-aggressive questioning during the random vote phase?

I don't think there's a problem with it, it's really the only way we're going to get out of random stage.

[Kublai Khan]

BTW - What's with the over-aggressive questioning during the random vote phase?

I don't think there's a problem with it, it's really the only way we're going to get out of random stage.

Yeah, but random stage is going to happen. Mind as well let people get it out of their system. Since PieIsPopcorn is starting the questioning in the opening 2 pages where people are still going to pop in with their random vote, all he accomplishes is sewing confusion and chaos into the opening procedures.

Better to let everyone show up, say their hellos, make their jokes, etc.., and then leap in with pointed questions. I just don't see the benefit in breaking with convention.

[LesterGroans]

Yeah, but random stage is going to happen. Mind as well let people get it out of their system. Since PieIsPopcorn is starting the questioning in the opening 2 pages where people are still going to pop in with their random vote, all he accomplishes is sewing confusion and chaos into the opening procedures.

Better to let everyone show up, say their hellos, make their jokes, etc.., and then leap in with pointed questions. I just don't see the benefit in breaking with convention.

Fair enough, I just don't see why it matters. If I showed up and there was actual content to work with I wouldn't feel the need to throw in a jokevote, I'd actually comment on what was going on.

[LesterGroans]

EDIT Generally I don't mind the random stage. Unless there is a reason to develop conversation as Alexhans seems to have given us. Now we can talk about stuff and don't need the random.

[BrianMcQueso]

<3 Red Coyote for having my back on Cool Spot.

While I find it silly to vote for ppp based on his joke to vote for "the mafia", I'd like it a lot more if he'd at least try to contribute. While random votes on people doesn't provide much useful information, it's still

something

.

@ Kublai: PieisPopcorn has a point. I get the feeling you were trying to push that bandwagon without being on it. It's pretty minor as far as scumtells go, but combined with how snappy and defensive you're acting towards Pie in response, I think it's worth a vote switch.

unvote: alexhans

vote: KublaiKhan

[Cream147]

Yeah, but random stage is going to happen. Mind as well let people get it out of their system. Since PieIsPopcorn is starting the questioning in the opening 2 pages where people are still going to pop in with their random vote, all he accomplishes is sewing confusion and chaos into the opening procedures.

Better to let everyone show up, say their hellos, make their jokes, etc.., and then leap in with pointed questions. I just don't see the benefit in breaking with convention.

I don't really see how this game has been a break in convention. Aggressive questioning during the random stage is generally how I've found games go from being random to serious. And that needs to happen at some point, doesn't it.

I find Chiefskye's action questionable, third vote on a bandwagon is always dodgy, third vote on a bandwagon in the random stage where the last two posts have also been votes on the same person, that's worse. However, in the random stage, I don't think anything too serious can be drawn from it...but IGMEOY Chiefskye.

[ChiefSkye4]

Vote ppp973

You know your vote doesn't count right?

ppp already had two votes for his behavior. Why did you feel the need to add a third on, for the exact same reasoning? Reeks of opportunism.

Vote: ChiefSkye4

To be completely honest, I was scanning the page, and I only saw 1 vote on him :/ Sounds like a convenient excuse, but it's true. Since it was the RVS, I didn't thoroughly read :/ ppp's vote stood out because it was longer than the others', and I saw it, and in going to reply, I spotted only one other vote, Archaist's.

I find Chiefskye's action questionable, third vote on a bandwagon is always dodgy, third vote on a bandwagon in the random stage where the last two posts have also been votes on the same person, that's worse. However, in the random stage, I don't think anything too serious can be drawn from it...but IGMEOY Chiefskye.

I put no stock into the "X on the wagon is scumz" flack, but, aside from that, my explanation is above. IGMEOY means "I've got my eyes on you" right? Haha sorry.

While the first two votes were relatively serious and were to draw pressure and information, this vote is just... there. It doesn't particularly seem to be placed for any particular reason. (Yes, I know, RVS, but it's placed on a player that had already recieved pressure for his actions.) Thusly, in my opinion, it warranted some pressure via my vote.

Again, explanation in the first paragraph, but wanted to add: I may be missing some things, but I do have a sense of humor. I understood that ppp's vote was a joke, and I returned with a joke. It was RVS, so I thought I could be lighthearted, but little did I know, I was 3rd to vote him, thinking I was only second.

Unvote

seeing as RVS is over, or nearly there, rather.

[ppp973]

Unvote, vote to lynch A mafiaso

Shessh I was kiddding, someone kept doing that one this sites I was playing at so I did it here

You said that you were scared, only mafia are scared to be lynched when the lynched targeted.

Unvote, Vote Alexhans

for now.