This is basically just random comments that I should have made earlier, but it's something.
Hoopla 286 wrote:This is going to be an ugly, almost random lynch if we don't actually come to some sort of consensus on who the best choice is. We need to decide now - I'm sorry if anyone wants to procrastinate for another few hours, but I don't want someone claiming something useful with 6 hours to spare. Come on guys!
I'll get this started - I've expressed nicolio is my optimum lynch choice today, but I could be persuaded to SensFan or Zazie. WAKE UP EVERYONE!
I hate this post. Seems like she's rather fakely trying to sound protown while also feeling out potential late wagons.
Sens 293 wrote:Hoopla wrote:
I know you have meta of being a shit/lazy player, but I don't think you deserve to get off that lightly.
Back that up right now. Or I will vote you, and will not move said vote today.
This and the vote following it are stupid. Maybe she was wrong, but personal offense is an atrocious reason to vote for someone especially given that there were legit reasons to vote for Hoopla according to some people yesterday (although I don't agree with said reasons), which means that this vote could be part of a lynch that maybe it shouldn't be. Yes, you do say later that those reasons are also a part of it, but since you weren't voting Hoopla before this that means it was this comment that led to the vote. The points made in 316 are all false exaggerations and/or not scumtells.
Hoopla wrote:I will give you credit though, for a crafty play of sneaking a vote on me, without ever mentioning suspicion of me prior to me 'insulting' you - and then leaving it there (presumably until deadline) without providing any reasons at all.
EA wrote:Everyone, pay close attention to this. SensFan said he was "very confident" that Nicolio was scum, going so far as to say he should be lynched page 4. Then he hopped off to OMGUS me, and now he's hopped off that to OMGUS Hoopla, forgetting his suspicion on Nicolio entirely.
Yes.
I'm blatantly biased, but Panzer's attack on me (pg 15) followed by backtracking when he's called out on it is scummy. Then he goes back to nicolio which at this point, IMO, is an obvious fallback and a pointless vote. We're not going to lynch nicolio over those D1 posts, I think that's obvious. Hoopla 386 is right, that argument does seem a bit contrived. Incidentally, I'm not getting the same vibe from charter in this game as I usually do from him as town. Namely, he isn't being ridiculously over-the-top aggressive. After their reactions to Hoopla's comment though I don't think it points to a scum pairing.
Panzer wrote:On Hoopla, all of her interaction with Khelv is exetremely scummy and given he is town, I have to take his opinion into some consideration.
Specifically how she was trying to trap people into commenting on her scummy play so she could attack weak players.
What?
Shanba wrote: However, scum have a motivation to fly under the radar - they want to avoid attention, to avoid giving away their alignment, in a way that townies don't. Even if we accept your proposition that it is done for null reasons more often than scummy ones, simple math tells us that it is still a scumtell.
Fair enough. It's a stupid strategy for scum IMO and a really boring one, but I suppose some people probably do it. Lurking the whole game will always get said lurker lynched if they make it to the endgame (or it should anyway) so meh. I never deliberately lurk like that so I'm probably inclined not to think of it as a tell.
SensFan wrote:Hoopla wrote:SensFan wrote:Hoopla, that text is anti-Town, please stop it.
W
o
u
l
d
y
o
u
l
y
n
c
h
m
e
f
o
r
i
t
?
Actually, yes. It blatantly hurts Town.
Unvote, vote: Hoopla
Posting in a different color does not hurt the town, it just annoys you. Get over it.
Anyway, having a legit opinion will require player-reads, but for now
FoS Panzer
