dejkha wrote:
Obviously if you're gonna try and frame him, you'll get on his wagon.
You don't bring up a case that can appear to be a big one and then not ever vote.
That alone makes you look bad. That's why I think it looked weird that you were on and off his wagon. You voted him, unvoted, voted him again and unvoted. Not everything is as simple as "who's scumhunting and who's not". I'm taking the liberty of looking deeper than that.
If you look at the post in question (post 277) I said in my last paragraph:
madeofphail wrote:Rofl was on to something, I believe that this was the reason that the scum killed him. This, along with Dejkha's massive post, seems like a good enough reason to think that giuseppe is scum.
Vote: Giuseppe
I did vote when I brought up the case, please do not try to bring false evidence to light against me. That accusation that I brought up a case and then did not vote has no base in reality.
I voted as I deemed necessary, and if you have an objection to that I believe that I answered that already. I posted:
made of phail in post 347 wrote:I put a vote on Giuseppe because Rofl was killed, and the people he was gunning for were emp, and giuseppe. Therefore, I believe that the mafia killed him to eliminate accusations against them. I now realize that what I am implying is that the mafia are stupid, and if they were giuseppe and/or empking, they would only be putting more suspicion on themselves, and this is not what they would do. Therefore, my post which "justified" voting for giuseppe is invalid proof. I did not think that far through. My error in judgement is directing negative attention to me.
If I understand correctly. you believe that I am scum trying to misdirect the town into voting giuseppe because If I was scum, I killed rofl and am currently trying to frame giuseppe. I made an error in judgement, which is my no means excusable. My first error in judgement contributed to a mislynch, and I now fear that my judgement in this day may cause yet another mislynch. I do not want a mislynch, and since my reasoning was insufficient there is no reason for me to persist my vote.
Unvote
Allow me to elaborate if you do not understand,as It appears that my language is too murky:
My original proof was that he was seemingly the name that the victim wrote in blood, and that was deemed illogical. With my basis for accusation gone, I saw it no longer fit to vote someone who was significantly closer to innocence in my eyes. Why would anyone vote for someone that they had little reason to accuse?
Moving on, as the posting proceeded, evidence seemed to pile upon giuseppe. Restating evidence already posted against someone is redundant, which was one of the things that provoked hostility towards giuseppe. I did not see fit to restate evidence that I agreed with.
The final unvote on giuseppe was proceeded by this sentence:
madeofphail in post 467 wrote:As far as the giuseppe conversation goes, I apologize for not giving proper consideration to your defense. With your defense clearly stated, My suspicions upon you have been reduced to a point where I do not see lynching you as prudent. As such:
Unvote
again, why vote someone who has accurately defended themselves and cleared them of suspicion for the most part? If I am not mistaken you also unvoted him when he finally made his big defense post. Upon recollection, the only two people voting him besides me where dejkha and AndyTony. Dejkha and AndyTony
BOTH
rescinded their vote on giuseppe after his defense post.
In short
, the first vote was through my own reasoning, my first unvote was when my reasoning was disproved. My second vote was because evidence was piling up, and the accused was not performing a strong defense. I saw him as scummy, and to restate points that were already stated that I believed in was redundant, so I voted. After the accused accurately defended himself, I saw fit to remove my vote.
Any questions? Any further accusations? If so, I would be delighted to answer your questions and help the town make an accurate discision.
