Pie E7- (Open 129): Game Over before 762

[dejkha]

Yes there is.

[hewitt]

I would disagree with you zwets I see reason to vote for Wall-E as well for reasons I've already stated.

[zwetschenwasser]

LURKING IS A NULLTELL DAMMIT

[dejkha]

Cool, so you don't mind if I stop posting then?

[dejkha]

Let me rephrase that. So you don't mind if me, hewitt and alex stop posting?

[zwetschenwasser]

No, because then you'll be replaced, and the game will revive.

[dejkha]

No, because if the mod prods me, I'll tell everyone I'm here and continue not to post, all while reading the thread.

[zwetschenwasser]

But then he'll prod you again, and if you get triple prodded, you'll be replaced.

[dejkha]

Then I'll just post to say I'm here every 72 hours so I don't need a prod.

[dejkha]

Also, Wall-E should be on his 2nd prod, according to the rules. So, after another 2 days, the mod should replace him.

[hewitt]

Okay dammit we know that Wall-E is not just off the site because he's posting in other games. It is lurking zwets.

[zwetschenwasser]

Maybe he forgot to watch it.

[dejkha]

Doubtful, considering he should've gotten two prods by now.

Mod: I expect Wall-E to be on his second prod that he should've gotten yesterday, so in two days if he doesn't respond, then replace him.

[hewitt]

I doubt that as well zwets.

[alexhans]

I haven't read everything but Ill quickly say this... Look at 761... Im playing it with Wall-e and he was lynched just like that... for playing scummyly and active lurking. Here he is only lurking. I prefer that he is replaced. But not myslynched. We can't afford those here.

Ill read later what everybody wrote after my post and give my thoughts about it.

[dejkha]

If he's replaced, then fine, but if he's not then that means he's been picking up his prods, so I'll lynch him if he continues this and he's not replaced.

[alexhans]

Alex: Write a paragraph detailing Dejhka's favorite colour.

??? I don't follow.

I have no idea. I'm just guessing at this point everybody's on a different wavelength than me but that's alright I'll get over it. And thank you Empking for saying something that I finally agree with and I will stick to no matter what.

Dont worry... We're all disagreeing with each other. In everything.

I think putting a lurker at L-1 without questions asked would be a good way to pull them into the game without the intention of lynching them at first. If they don't, then I'd consider it acceptable to lynch them.

Well... I can understand the pressure but not the consideration... Lynching lurkers just for lurking is a Big NO in my book.


Crap... He only made 3 posts... last 1 March 29... the game started on March 23.
This are Wall-e's posts

/confirm

vote: hewitt

smells like poo

The "case" against dejka is utter garbage.

MOD

: I don't care if he hasnt picked the prod or if he does later. We REALLY need to replace him. We are loosing time here. He does not want to play the game... He is only spoiling it.
Anyone who agrees say AYE!

Also... It would be better if people quoted the questions they are answering because sometimes it can get difficult to follow. Thank you

[dejkha]

Well... I can understand the pressure but not the consideration... Lynching lurkers just for lurking is a Big NO in my book.

I like to think it's similar to russian roulette in the sense that if he goes in knowing the gun's empty, then he won't care. He'll just do it and be done. You have to make it mean something. Every pull of the trigger brings you closer and closer to your demise. That's why you throw in a single bullet. So he knows it'll happen if he doesn't stop. Pressure means nothing if it doesn't have an eventual consequence.

[alexhans]

Well... I can understand the pressure but not the consideration... Lynching lurkers just for lurking is a Big NO in my book.

I like to think it's similar to russian roulette in the sense that if he goes in knowing the gun's empty, then he won't care. He'll just do it and be done. You have to make it mean something. Every pull of the trigger brings you closer and closer to your demise. That's why you throw in a single bullet. So he knows it'll happen if he doesn't stop. Pressure means nothing if it doesn't have an eventual consequence.

that's why we disagree then... I doubt the usefulness of voting someone for lurking expecting to get real info...

If I vote a lurker for pressure (but knowing that I might lynch him because otherwise it would have no effect), he doesnt respond... I lynch him? I DONT like it. Why vote in the first place... FoS him... call his attention... I don't know. Say you're incredibly suspicious of his lurking.

Well... that's just it... I find your gameplay wrong. Wich is MY opinion and I should be entitled to have it. I hope we settle that so we don't argue unnecesarily.

[zwetschenwasser]

I haven't read everything but Ill quickly say this... Look at 761... Im playing it with Wall-e and he was lynched just like that... for playing scummyly and active lurking. Here he is only lurking. I prefer that he is replaced. But not myslynched. We can't afford those here.

Ill read later what everybody wrote after my post and give my thoughts about it.

Finally! Someone who is willing to listen to reason!

[dejkha]

Alex, honestly, I wasn't intending on lynching him. But now since everyone made me admit to it being just pressure, it defeats the point and now I have to lynch him if he doesn't get replaced.

[alexhans]

Alex, honestly, I wasn't intending on lynching him. But now since everyone made me admit to it being just pressure, it defeats the point and now I have to lynch him if he doesn't get replaced.

You could always admit you were wrong... They told me it doesn't hurt but I wouldn't know...

[hewitt]

You don't ahve to lynch him. I don't understand what you mean by that. If you don't think he's scummy then don't vote for him. Simple as that.

[dejkha]

If he's lurking and purposely not playing, then he's scummy, so my vote is staying where it is until he's replaced.

[zwetschenwasser]

Stubborn mule...