Pie E7- (Open 129): Game Over before 762

[Empking]

And on the note of Wall-E, he's clearly lurking, so I'm gonna take the liberty to start his wagon.

Unvote Vote: Wall-E

[dejkha]

Was that a hammer?

[Empking]

Was that a hammer?

You're saying that you voted a player you did not want lynched? And that you have announced that fact in the thread?

[dejkha]

Yes.

[Empking]

Yes.

Why did you do that?

[dejkha]

Because we need to do something to keep him from lurking. Votes may be just the thing.

[Empking]

Because we need to do something to keep him from lurking. Votes may be just the thing.

Votes that he knows won't lead to lynches?

[dejkha]

They will if they have to.

[Empking]

They will if they have to.

So you were going for a lurker lynch.

[dejkha]

I already answered that.

[hewitt]

The lurker hunt coming from Dej seems like scum trying to get a lurker lynch.

Hewitt: What scummier (IYO) Active lurking or lurking?

Lurking in my opinion.

And Wall-E was just hammered??

[dejkha]

No. I'm the only vote on him as far as I can tell.

[hewitt]

Oh. Then I'm confused what the hammer discussion is about.

[alexhans]

I don't like the fact that hasdgfas posted twenty-nine minutes after being prodded which leads me to believe he was lurking heavily and since then (two days ago) has not posted again. And Wall-E has not posted in four days after picking up a prod. I believe that these two could be scum and are planning on just sliding under the radar since they know we've got quite strong personalities in this game who may self-destruct as town. So I'm going to retract my ridiculous vote.

Ok... I understand your points but saying that 2 scummies are planning to lurk to the point of getting prodded together...? That doesn't make so much sense... 1 is possible... even probable... Both of them I don't think so...

so if the game continues the way it has, I'm going to have to be replaced. I will not play with people who act like this with each other.
I haven't posted because I don't want to get in the middle of this ridiculous argument. If I don't get some measure of assurance that we're through with that, I'm done.

This is Mafia man... endure. You could always post something useful besides the ridiculous argument you say there is.

I would much prefer a lurker lynch than a policy lynch. More likely to catch scum...obviously.

I would like to avoid both.

Have you seen anything else important?

Yes, and I listed about 6 or 7, so should I assume you stopped reading altogether?

it all looks like the silly argument right now

Bad way to dismiss a good point.

Wow, it looks like you're refusing to see anything other than an argument or you haven't been reading. Either way, it's not good.

I'm sorry that everything looks like the argument. When that's all that's happened in the past 5 pages, that's what everything looks like. In a couple days, I should be able to look at everything, but I'm currently in the week of doom right now at school and don't really have time to look through everything. It's mostly skimming, and while skimming, it looks like argument.

You're switching arguments here man... first it was the stupid argument... now it's school... I can understand being busy but not switching like that under pressure.

I would think twenty-nine minutes is a little convenient after a couple of days absence.

Err... Too farfetched... Not valid as an argument in my book. Sorry hewitt.

I would think twenty-nine minutes is a little convenient after a couple of days absence.

QFT

why?

Because we need to do something to keep him from lurking. Votes may be just the thing.

Votes that he knows won't lead to lynches?

come on man... Not every vote you make is gonna be parked forever. It CAN change.

They will if they have to.

So you were going for a lurker lynch.

This... I think... Is what is sucking so much about this game... The role playing of lawyers trying to trap (with 1 line sentences) his victims. We got the point. No need to go over and over and over it again. And if you do... do it clearly in an organized post... This is not a chat.

And Wall-E was just hammered??

what gave you that impression? we are a bit lost aren't we?
to clarify: I think it was the quote of Empking and the following post by dej that talked about a hammer. But they were discussing the vote on wall-e by dej... that wasn't made to lynch him just yet but to make him appear... react... do something...

[dejkha]

Hewitt, I'm really not seeing whats so hard to understand about this discussion. He seem to be "confused" about nearly everything in this game regardless who how straight forward it is.

why?

Because it's a lot more likely that he's been lurking and posted when he saw someone call him on it than him not reading the thread for a couple days and then just happened to return a half hour later.

[Empking]

I don't like the fact that hasdgfas posted twenty-nine minutes after being prodded which leads me to believe he was lurking heavily and since then (two days ago) has not posted again. And Wall-E has not posted in four days after picking up a prod. I believe that these two could be scum and are planning on just sliding under the radar since they know we've got quite strong personalities in this game who may self-destruct as town. So I'm going to retract my ridiculous vote.

Ok... I understand your points but saying that 2 scummies are planning to lurk to the point of getting prodded together...? That doesn't make so much sense... 1 is possible... even probable... Both of them I don't think so...

so if the game continues the way it has, I'm going to have to be replaced. I will not play with people who act like this with each other.
I haven't posted because I don't want to get in the middle of this ridiculous argument. If I don't get some measure of assurance that we're through with that, I'm done.

This is Mafia man... endure. You could always post something useful besides the ridiculous argument you say there is.

I would much prefer a lurker lynch than a policy lynch. More likely to catch scum...obviously.

I would like to avoid both.

Have you seen anything else important?

Yes, and I listed about 6 or 7, so should I assume you stopped reading altogether?

it all looks like the silly argument right now

Bad way to dismiss a good point.

Wow, it looks like you're refusing to see anything other than an argument or you haven't been reading. Either way, it's not good.

I'm sorry that everything looks like the argument. When that's all that's happened in the past 5 pages, that's what everything looks like. In a couple days, I should be able to look at everything, but I'm currently in the week of doom right now at school and don't really have time to look through everything. It's mostly skimming, and while skimming, it looks like argument.

You're switching arguments here man... first it was the stupid argument... now it's school... I can understand being busy but not switching like that under pressure.

I would think twenty-nine minutes is a little convenient after a couple of days absence.

Err... Too farfetched... Not valid as an argument in my book. Sorry hewitt.

I would think twenty-nine minutes is a little convenient after a couple of days absence.

QFT

why?

Because we need to do something to keep him from lurking. Votes may be just the thing.

Votes that he knows won't lead to lynches?

come on man... Not every vote you make is gonna be parked forever. It CAN change.

They will if they have to.

So you were going for a lurker lynch.

This... I think... Is what is sucking so much about this game... The role playing of lawyers trying to trap (with 1 line sentences) his victims. We got the point. No need to go over and over and over it again. And if you do... do it clearly in an organized post... This is not a chat.

And Wall-E was just hammered??

what gave you that impression? we are a bit lost aren't we?
to clarify: I think it was the quote of Empking and the following post by dej that talked about a hammer. But they were discussing the vote on wall-e by dej... that wasn't made to lynch him just yet but to make him appear... react... do something...

When you vote that vote should be willing to be their for an eventual lynch.

Alex: Write a paragraph detailing Dejhka's favorite colour.

[hewitt]

I have no idea. I'm just guessing at this point everybody's on a different wavelength than me but that's alright I'll get over it. And thank you Empking for saying something that I finally agree with and I will stick to no matter what.

When you cast a vote that vote should be for the person you want to be lynched.

[dejkha]

Not always.

[hewitt]

Alright well I would have to disagree with that. When do you think it's appropriate to vote without the intent to lynch then?

[dejkha]

I think putting a lurker at L-1 without questions asked would be a good way to pull them into the game without the intention of lynching them at first. If they don't, then I'd consider it acceptable to lynch them.

[hewitt]

Hm, interesting I guess but you're saying that the people who had put him at L-1 should not have the intention to lynch with their votes?

[zwetschenwasser]

Not always.

*facepalm*

[dejkha]

It doesn't matter what their intention is, whether to lynch or not. Once at L-1, depending on the result of if the lurker returns, they're free to unvote if they don't think its necessary, but I'm saying that I would consider it acceptable if it happened.

[hewitt]

Okay well you can count that if my vote is on that L-1 I will most likely not be pulling my vote away unless I'm persuaded otherwise by someone who I feel is scummier.

[zwetschenwasser]

THERE IS NO REASON TO BE VOTING WALLE