fhqwhgads
It is now Night.
I don't understand why you'd watch Spring over Jebus.Don wrote:target: spring lullaby. noone targeted springlullaby but me
The OMGUS is complete bull.Spring wrote:Lynx The Antithesis - scum verdict as per yesterday plus the whole OMGUS FOS
i thought that was the plan. SL protects jebus, jebus protects me, i watch SL.Sl wrote:don_johnson - I'd like an explanation on why he targetted me instead of Jebus
it doesn't. that was my emotional reaction to your "disappointment" with me. though, i am confused as to why you are so concerned with spolium. i have a neutral read on them.springlullaby wrote:Explain how it 'exposes me as a fraud'.don_johnson wrote:why? because it exposes you as a fraud?
Hmm... this is tough. I want to agree with you here. Although I have to point out that Don's role is still pretty unconfirmed. Also his alignment, regardless of his role.RC wrote:Initial reaction:
There is only one scum group, and I'm not convinced there are two Doctors. I believe don. I'm going to need a good reason not to want to lynch spring today.
I will give a better post later.
Oh I see, this would be from your being innocent perspective. That reaction is weird, eitheir unthinking or over the top innocent crumbing: so, tell me, what reason do I have to think that I'm not a quack?Spolium wrote:Scum located.
There was no roleblocker to prevent you from killing me N1, what reason did you have to think you're a quack?Spring wrote:I certainly wouldn't have protected Jebus in case i'm a quack, killing the doc and framing myself in the process.
vote: Springlullaby
Because you may be scum. Are you serious there? Because this is really unintelligent.Spolium wrote:I protected spolium because my sanity is in doubt and N1 protection had no adverse effect.
----> N1 protection had no adverse effect, despite a lack of roleblocker - poss. naive doc
I certainly wouldn't have protected Jebus in case i'm a quack, killing the doc and framing myself in the process.
----> Why worry about killing the doc if targetting me had no adverse effect?