Mini 740 - Communiqu├® Mafia 2: Game Over and the Winner is..

Rhinox · Post Post #775 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:16 pm

PhilyEc wrote:I know your night phase was long but I'd have loved a response from
them
before you devoured my hypothesis <_<' Now the new guy has nothing to go on.

Trying to pull the newbie card?

PhilyEc · Post Post #776 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:21 pm

Flameaxe wrote:
PhilyEc wrote:I know your night phase was long but I'd have loved a response from
them
before you devoured my hypothesis <_<' Now the new guy has nothing to go on.
Rereading: Try Some.

Sometimes I feel you're not even reading my posts.
I tried rereading, but I just can't, 31 pages of tripe, and what can it tell us when there are no leaks on who the dead were. I really dont know where to go with the game.

Budja · Post Post #777 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:28 pm

I told you the relevant parts of day 1.

PhilyEc · Post Post #778 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:39 pm

No you didnt O_o

Rhinox · Post Post #779 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:42 pm

Budja wrote:I told you the relevant parts of day 1.

Sometimes its better if players would determine what is relevant for themselves.

Phily, I read your wiki. Is it true you're currently playing in over 10 ongoing games concurrently? Its not my place to tell you how many games you should play at a time, but I'm not going to sympathize with you for not having the time or attention span to read through the thread when you're in so many ongoing games.

I mean, I get it. I replaced in too, and this game felt like a chore to read through. But I've done it. More than once now actually, and I'm still trying to put the pieces together. And I'm only in 2 ongoings.

Rhinox · Post Post #780 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:43 pm

PhilyEc wrote:No you didnt O_o

FWIW, yeah, he did. Or, rather, he gave you his interpretation of what he felt was relevant.

Budja wrote:Most of day 1 is easy to read and you can just skim it. The big points are the com-burning plan, no-lynch discussion and roff lying.

Also, I did mean theory.

PhilyEc · Post Post #781 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:47 pm

Rhinox wrote:
PhilyEc wrote:No you didnt O_o
FWIW, yeah, he did. Or, rather, he gave you his interpretation of what he felt was relevant.

Budja wrote:Most of day 1 is easy to read and you can just skim it. The big points are the com-burning plan, no-lynch discussion and roff lying.

Also, I did mean theory.

Ack, he double posted and I didnt notice the 1st post back then.. point taken, I'll pop over to it now.

Flameaxe · Post Post #782 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 3:23 pm

PhilyEc wrote:
Flameaxe wrote:
PhilyEc wrote:I know your night phase was long but I'd have loved a response from
them
before you devoured my hypothesis <_<' Now the new guy has nothing to go on.
Rereading: Try Some.
Sometimes I feel you're not even reading my posts.
I tried rereading, but I just can't, 31 pages of tripe, and what can it tell us when there are no leaks on who the dead were. I really dont know where to go with the game.

No excuse. I did it. Get off your lazy ass and fucking do it. Thanks.

PhilyEc · Post Post #783 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 3:29 pm

Flameaxe wrote:
PhilyEc wrote:
Flameaxe wrote:
PhilyEc wrote:I know your night phase was long but I'd have loved a response from
them
before you devoured my hypothesis <_<' Now the new guy has nothing to go on.
Rereading: Try Some.
Sometimes I feel you're not even reading my posts.
I tried rereading, but I just can't, 31 pages of tripe, and what can it tell us when there are no leaks on who the dead were. I really dont know where to go with the game.
No excuse. I did it. Get off your lazy ass and fucking do it. Thanks.

You havent a clue what I do so simply calm down and understand, when I say I can't do something, it means I can't, you punctuating isnt going to get all this crud out of my way either.

Budja · Post Post #784 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 3:39 pm

@Flameaxe, note post #764. I would like to hear your suspicions too.

Flameaxe · Post Post #785 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 4:08 pm

Flameaxe wrote:
PhilyEc wrote:Is you suspicions of one of don/hohum mostly a gut-feeling?

You could call it gut feeling but I really doubt both are town man. Reading their posts to eachother made me think theyre directly opposed. Its context drenched alot of scum accusations upon one another (more so by hohum).

I cant really look further back into the game as its just gunk, who do you think is scum Budja?

Why can't two townies call each other scum exactly? I'm curious.

DJ: As I said in my first post, I'll say after we get that "totally amazing" case we've been waiting for to say, and most likely vote. (Yes, the case influences my opinion if you were wondering).

Reading hard.

Flameaxe · Post Post #786 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 4:09 pm

PhilyEc wrote:
Flameaxe wrote:
PhilyEc wrote:
Flameaxe wrote:
PhilyEc wrote:I know your night phase was long but I'd have loved a response from
them
before you devoured my hypothesis <_<' Now the new guy has nothing to go on.
Rereading: Try Some.
Sometimes I feel you're not even reading my posts.
I tried rereading, but I just can't, 31 pages of tripe, and what can it tell us when there are no leaks on who the dead were. I really dont know where to go with the game.
No excuse. I did it. Get off your lazy ass and fucking do it. Thanks.
You havent a clue what I do so simply calm down and understand, when I say I can't do something, it means I can't, you punctuating isnt going to get all this crud out of my way either.

You're old enough to read. Who the fuck replaces in a game to say "oh, I can't re-read! Oh well!"? Grow a pair and read it. I'll calm down when you start doing your fucking job around here, as you're pretty useless without it.

Budja · Post Post #787 (ISO) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 4:14 pm

@Flameaxe, sorry I didn't notice that.

I wish you would make it more clear and mention hohum by name. I am not so keen on ambiguity in suspect lists. Do have any suspicions on anyone else?

Juls · Post Post #788 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 12:24 am

Just popping in to say now that marathon weekend is over, I will catch up and post tonight.

Rhinox · Post Post #789 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 10:46 am

so... now what? sit here until a deadline is imposed and then rush to lynch anybody before a no-lynch?

In a no-reveal game, when there seems to be no leads and activity grinds to a halt (like now >_>), is simply voting to no-lynch a reasonable play?

Juls · Post Post #790 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 10:58 am

We have some replacement issues I think Rhinox.

I think dahill needs to evaluate who is here/not here

. This game has a serious issue with not having a full group at any given time. I personally wouldn't mind a no-lynch because I have a better feel for the game today than I did yesterday and it may be that it would be the case tomorrow as well. But, before we do that I would like for people to make use of their communique's and find out whatever information they can for THIS day and if any information is worth being shared/capable of being shared then they should do so.

But I am going to read and catch up too...so I reserve the right to change that opinion.

dahill1 · Post Post #791 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:07 am

Still searching for Cybele replacement. Mass prods to those who haven't posted in the last 3 days. Deadline will be imposed if activity doesn't pick up

dahill1 · Post Post #792 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:27 am

1 - Juls - Posted March 30
2 - Rhinox (rep. Ectomancer) - Posted March 30
4 - Skitzer (rep. RossWilliam) - Posted March 28
5 - hohum (rep. bubbles21112) - Posted March 21 (will replace if he doesn't pick up this prod)
7 - Flameaxe (rep. Reecer6) - Posted March 28
8 - Budja - Posted March 28
9 - PhilyEc (rep. Braeden) - Posted March 28
10 - don_johnson (rep. dorvaan) - V/LA
11 - Cybele (rep. magicrabbit) - Searching for replacement
12 - Casey - Posted March 27

So..prodding hohum and Casey

Juls · Post Post #793 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:28 am

Thanks dahill.

don_johnson · Post Post #794 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:39 pm

i can get behind a no lynch.

no, seriously. i will have more time later this week. just got back from milwaukee. i havent' seen hohum anywhere on the site lately.

Rhinox · Post Post #795 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:26 am

hohum was just replaced in another game I'm in...

Juls · Post Post #796 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:41 am

Happy Birthday Rhinox!!!!!!

dahill1 · Post Post #797 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2009 8:37 am

And I just noticed that hohum didn't pick up an earlier prod, so he is being replaced

dahill1 · Post Post #798 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2009 9:16 am

going to be V/LA this friday to sunday (april 3-5)

Casey · Post Post #799 (ISO) » Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:12 am

Sorry, I had a death in the family and was out of town all weekend.

I will try to respond as best I can right now. I have a lot of RL things to catch up on.

PhilyEc wrote:I'm not sure about DJ or Hohum. Casey, I look to you for assistance =P Any reason why DJ is your top suspect?

Budja wrote:@casey, if you "feeling" on don is more than gut, I would like some evidence.
Why is Phily "town", gut?

After my questions to him fell flat, I don't have anything to go on for Don. His desire to see Hohum lynched I guess is a bad "gut" feeling. (Although I am very happy to see Hohum gone... unfortunately Flameaxe seems to be Hohum incarnate.)

And I would like the attacks on Phily to stop this instant. I have proof that Phily is town. I was told not to talk about how I learned this, so that's all I'll say.