I would have liked both opinions but we can start with it.The Fonz wrote:Actually, given that with only two not voting, there's no way anyone can catch ABR and Seraph, should we just start the runoff?
Totally not seeing the case on ABR.
I would have liked both opinions but we can start with it.The Fonz wrote:Actually, given that with only two not voting, there's no way anyone can catch ABR and Seraph, should we just start the runoff?
shutuppopulartajo wrote:NO, YOU PLAY BY THE RULES. IF YOU DONT PLAY BY THE RULES, FONZ AND FRIENDS WILL KILL YOUR SOUL.roflcopter wrote:hopefully everyone is aware by now, but for the record i am finishing off xyl before i start on seraphim. i encourage everyone else to kill him in the meantime, that would be a much more economical use of the town's time.
yesThe Fonz wrote:Actually, given that with only two not voting, there's no way anyone can catch ABR and Seraph, should we just start the runoff?
so you should probably call off team: retribution and try to kill scum instead of naughty childrenThe Fonz wrote:I'm actually terribly worried that the town will lose like the first game, which the town lost because they killed people who 'broke the rules' and opposed the voting system, rather than scum.
and i'm playing along and voting, but i'm still going to kill xylthixlm before i join the in the masshurting. if enough people follow tajo's rules you don't even need my help to masshurt someone to death anyway. and i was never going to hurt someone i didn't think was scum just because the vote said to, that would be idiotic.The Fonz wrote:Dude... notice how we're doing a different system now? That doesn't need enforcing so much.
Frankly, and i think you've set this up deliberately, we're kind of faced with the choice of killing you, or letting you do what you want. And it's pretty close.
People who are dead are not dead beacuse they were agaisnt the voting systeme. Some or dead (and some close to) because of disorganized damage.The Fonz wrote:I'm actually terribly worried that the town will lose like the first game, which the town lost because they killed people who 'broke the rules' and opposed the voting system, rather than scum.
trying, its a slow processThe Fonz wrote:Hey Rofl, killing scum would be a good idea for you, too.
you're really helpfulSeraphim wrote:Check back. I offered an analysis.
I'm fairly sure that rofl is scum but I'm not sure who his scum buddies might be.
I don't want to kill him, because he's obvtown.populartajo wrote:People who are dead are not dead beacuse they were agaisnt the voting systeme. Some or dead (and some close to) because of disorganized damage.The Fonz wrote:I'm actually terribly worried that the town will lose like the first game, which the town lost because they killed people who 'broke the rules' and opposed the voting system, rather than scum.
Now are you saying that you are scared of killing rolf?
Shouldnt that be a reason to punish this kind of behaviors?The Fonz wrote:I don't want to kill him, because he's obvtown.populartajo wrote:People who are dead are not dead beacuse they were agaisnt the voting systeme. Some or dead (and some close to) because of disorganized damage.The Fonz wrote:I'm actually terribly worried that the town will lose like the first game, which the town lost because they killed people who 'broke the rules' and opposed the voting system, rather than scum.
Now are you saying that you are scared of killing rolf?
I don't mean this game. Check out the last game, where the town lost not because of 'disorganized damage' but because the people doing it were town, and the rest of the town went along with the scum in killing them for it.