-XylBot- Game over! Winners page 56.

[roflcopter]

!unvote

!vote shadow knight

i could lynch either him or empking

[Xtoxm]

If Emp is scum be bussed Vir pretty hard.

Plus, Emp looks like he has extra info townie style.

[tubby216]

ok i gott it now tar

but no empking's alt has been worthless too

[roflcopter]

so shadow knight it is then

[Xtoxm]

For those of you who forgot:

I mupped Tar N0, and I guess it protected him.

Question for players with more experience with IRC: Would MUP be told if the ability failed to resolve (due roleblock or something similar)? I assume no, but I want to double-check. This is a matter of the utmost importance.

The MUP would be told that they were blocked if they were blocked. However, if the MUP simply protected or did nothing (which don't give any sort of confirmation like kill and inspect do), there would be no message. Is that what you're asking?

The real question is, would a MUP be told his ability failed if he targeted an untargetable player N0?

No.

In that case, I'm going to go ahead and call Zwet mostly cleared. He got the right N0 result, too.

Yes, this is a softclaim that I am a role that was untargetable N0 and targetable N1.

1) Do I really need to spell the actual role name out to you?
2) If yes, start piling on some votes, because I'm not claiming until I'm at L-2.

Some kind of coward?

Coward can be maf if that's what you're thinking.

Vir also would know a lot bout the bot, so Tan dieing doesn't mean scum are in the dark.

[Empking]

ok i gott it now tar

but no empking's alt has been worthless too

But is he likely scum? That's the question you should be asking.

[Xtoxm]

Oh, my bad, it looks like 2 scum left.

[populartajo]

So
Empking's Alt - gunsmith, prob town
+hasdgfas (rep. BSG) - vt, prob town
+KaleiÃ

[tubby216]

taj i claimed gunsmith

[Empking]

I'm not a Gunsmith

[Xtoxm]

Kale had something on Tan...

Yoiu mixed up Emp with Tubby

[Xtoxm]

Wait, I just looked back at Zwet and he didn't get a result on Tar N0.

Zwet, what are all your actions/results each night?

[KaleiÐoscøpe]

!vote Tubby

[Xtoxm]

I have no intention of lynching tubby. If you have info, claim.

[KaleiÐoscøpe]

I have reason to believe tubby is lying

Not concerning my role, but role interaction.

[tubby216]

role interaction?

can you explain?

[populartajo]

So
Empking's Alt - prob town
+hasdgfas (rep. BSG) - vt, prob town
+KaleiÃ

[Xtoxm]

Kale seems town.

It seems shadow knight is a healthy lynch.

Mm.

Any idea's on the last scum?

[roflcopter]

!unvote

!vote tubby

scope is town, i believe him

[Tarhalindur]

Yes, Xtoxm, I know Coward can be Mafia. Tanarin was trying to drill that into everyone's head on Day 2.

No, people, I don't think the Shadow Knight lynch is a good idea. He built a pretty good case on tubby (even going so far as to make a good PBPA). That, plus his admitted inexperience with IRC mafia, says to me that he's probably town.

[Tarhalindur]

[quote="KaleiÃ

[zwetschenwasser]

N0, no result. N1, Tar is innocent. N2, DGB dies. N3, Armix dies. That's my rundown, folks.

[Xtoxm]

Ok. The fact this mafia group appear not to be killing is strange :/

[populartajo]

More to the point, I'd like to hear reasons for those votes on me. I was suspicious of Empking even before he voted me for no stated reason, then asked for a claim with no reasoning given.

More interesting is poptajo - is there a reason why I "should have claimed long ago"?

yeah, i dont like your play in this game.

That's not enough. Be specific.

1) What parts of my play don't you like?
2) Why should I think that "don't like your play" isn't an attempt to justify "hey, I'm scum and I want Tar dead - I'm going to call him scummy now and fabricate a case later"?
3) Why is "I don't like your play" sufficient to ask for a claim?

you are usually more involved when you are town but kay, ill give you the benefit of the doubt.

[populartajo]

Ok. The fact this mafia group appear not to be killing is strange :/

what daya mean?