-XylBot- Game over! Winners page 56.

tubby216 · Post Post #1050 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:56 am

i thought zwet already muped tar?

anyway

i investigated kevy, kevy has no gun

roflcopter · Post Post #1051 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:58 am

tubby216 wrote:i thought zwet already muped tar?

anyway

i investigated kevy, kevy has no gun

!unvote

!vote tubby

you are an idiot for investigating kevy

tubby216 · Post Post #1052 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:00 am

why?
i thought it was a pretty good choice

roflcopter · Post Post #1053 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:01 am

did you read day one

at all

? or day two? kevy has been confirmed town for a long time. there was no question about his alignment.

tubby216 · Post Post #1054 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:02 am

no he wasn't confirmed town, everyone just said he was town, and i wanted to make sure,

so now that i have my result he is confirmed,

roflcopter · Post Post #1055 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:03 am

you really can't read between the lines can you

populartajo · Post Post #1056 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:03 am

roflcopter wrote:did you read day one
at all
? or day two? kevy has been confirmed town for a long time. there was no question about his alignment.

i missed this. why was he confirmed town?

roflcopter · Post Post #1057 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:03 am

populartajo wrote:
roflcopter wrote:did you read day one
at all
? or day two? kevy has been confirmed town for a long time. there was no question about his alignment.
i missed this. why was he confirmed town?

because i said so. no, really, thats why.

Empking's Alt · Post Post #1058 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:05 am

Tar claiming would be OK.

populartajo · Post Post #1059 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:07 am

roflcopter wrote:
populartajo wrote:
roflcopter wrote:did you read day one
at all
? or day two? kevy has been confirmed town for a long time. there was no question about his alignment.
i missed this. why was he confirmed town?
because i said so. no, really, thats why.

kk

populartajo · Post Post #1060 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:08 am

Empking's Alt wrote:Tar claiming would be OK.

i agree but rolf disagrees.
any reason why?

roflcopter · Post Post #1061 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:10 am

tajo, you were intimately involved in the pissing match that went on between kevy, tar and myself day one, so i'm surprised you don't remember it, but then it was a long time ago. anyway, after we cleared the air over that whole thing i'm pretty much convinced tar is town.

Xtoxm · Post Post #1062 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:17 am

Mmk.

!vote Shadow

Tarhalindur · Post Post #1063 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:26 am

More to the point, I'd like to hear reasons for those votes on me. I was suspicious of Empking even before he voted me for no stated reason, then asked for a claim with no reasoning given.

More interesting is poptajo - is there a reason why I "should have claimed long ago"?

Tarhalindur · Post Post #1064 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:26 am

Actually, question for IRC veterans: Do IRC Mafiosos usually have daytalk?

Yes, it's important.

populartajo · Post Post #1065 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:30 am

roflcopter wrote:tajo, you were intimately involved in the pissing match that went on between kevy, tar and myself day one, so i'm surprised you don't remember it, but then it was a long time ago. anyway, after we cleared the air over that whole thing i'm pretty much convinced tar is town.

i do remember it but i have this crazy feeling that tar faked it.

populartajo · Post Post #1066 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:30 am

Tarhalindur wrote:More to the point, I'd like to hear reasons for those votes on me. I was suspicious of Empking even before he voted me for no stated reason, then asked for a claim with no reasoning given.

More interesting is poptajo - is there a reason why I "should have claimed long ago"?

yeah, i dont like your play in this game.

roflcopter · Post Post #1067 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:30 am

populartajo wrote:
roflcopter wrote:tajo, you were intimately involved in the pissing match that went on between kevy, tar and myself day one, so i'm surprised you don't remember it, but then it was a long time ago. anyway, after we cleared the air over that whole thing i'm pretty much convinced tar is town.
i do remember it but i have this crazy feeling that tar faked it.

i am suddenly much more suspicious of you

Xtoxm · Post Post #1068 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:52 am

Tarhalindur wrote:Actually, question for IRC veterans: Do IRC Mafiosos usually have daytalk?

Yes, it's important.

No.

Tarhalindur · Post Post #1069 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:52 am

populartajo wrote:
Tarhalindur wrote:More to the point, I'd like to hear reasons for those votes on me. I was suspicious of Empking even before he voted me for no stated reason, then asked for a claim with no reasoning given.

More interesting is poptajo - is there a reason why I "should have claimed long ago"?
yeah, i dont like your play in this game.

That's not enough. Be specific.

1) What parts of my play don't you like?
2) Why should I think that "don't like your play" isn't an attempt to justify "hey, I'm scum and I want Tar dead - I'm going to call him scummy now and fabricate a case later"?
3) Why is "I don't like your play" sufficient to ask for a claim?

Xtoxm · Post Post #1070 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:53 am

Pop looks pretty town to me...Tar you've been acting weird p much all game and i've not seen anything to convinve me you're town. Please claim.

Tarhalindur · Post Post #1071 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:57 am

Xtoxm wrote:
Tarhalindur wrote:Actually, question for IRC veterans: Do IRC Mafiosos usually have daytalk?

Yes, it's important.
No.

Excellent! That means there's a fair chance that the rest of the Mafia weren't able to interpret and capitalize on Tanarin's attempts to tip them off as to what role I probably have after my Day 2 softclaim.

(Or they weren't paying attention/forgot that I pretty much claimed my role Day 2.)

roflcopter · Post Post #1072 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:57 am

tar, don't fullclaim

Tarhalindur · Post Post #1073 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:59 am

For those of you who forgot:

Tarhalindur, Day 2 wrote:
Kevy wrote:
Tarhalindur wrote:
Kevy wrote:
Tarhalindur wrote:
zwetschenwasser wrote:I mupped Tar N0, and I guess it protected him.
Question for players with more experience with IRC: Would MUP be told if the ability failed to resolve (due roleblock or something similar)? I assume no, but I want to double-check. This is a matter of the utmost importance.
The MUP would be told that they were blocked if they were blocked. However, if the MUP simply protected or did nothing (which don't give any sort of confirmation like kill and inspect do), there would be no message. Is that what you're asking?
The real question is, would a MUP be told his ability failed if he targeted an untargetable player N0?
No.
In that case, I'm going to go ahead and call Zwet mostly cleared. He got the right N0 result, too.

Yes, this is a softclaim that I am a role that was untargetable N0 and targetable N1.

1) Do I really need to spell the actual role name out to you?
2) If yes, start piling on some votes, because I'm not claiming until I'm at L-2.

hasdgfas · Post Post #1074 (ISO) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:59 am

Xtoxm wrote:Pop looks pretty town to me...Tar you've been acting weird p much all game and i've not seen anything to convinve me you're town. Please claim.

I haven't seen anything that doesn't make me think he's town. Convince me. What and how has he been acting weird?

I believe tubby now.

Why hasn't anyone looked at Empking's Alt? Has he done anything?