WE NEED ONLY A SYSTEM, DA.Giuseppe wrote:@Fons- I'll be instituting my policy on this game once we have a flip on Walt, and I can reevaluate my scum opinions. You can expect me to act on people who don't use the Buddy System or my system. Those in favor of my system should use it, those in favor of the Buddy System should always use it. It'll catch on faster.
@Juls- No, you're not. To the best of my recollection.
As far as I know you are not dead.Juls wrote:Damnit Tajo do you not read? I won't be HURTING my team if I can catch up. I am doing that BEFORE I play any marathon games. Now will somebody just answer the damn question...am I dead in the eyes of the mod or not? Two games with you is enough to make someone pull all their damn hair out!
Xylthixlm wrote: As of post 1591:
zwetschenwasser has 2 fewer damage points than expected.
It is not clear whether WaltWishbone's heal on roflcopter will count.
Nuwen is brazenly town. I'm liking this.Nuwen wrote:Put a sock in it [...] is just retarded.
So, you need a super-mega-hurtwagon to stop being his puppet? Did you ask for his permission first?Juls wrote:As of this minute I am no longer ABRs puppet if I am not dead.
I see what you did, you hurried up to use up a hurt on a middling player after reading only 7 pages. Fake participation much?Juls wrote:7 pages in and I have one suspect that every single post is scummy and that person is Tenchi. I will go ahead and hurt him
Hurt: Tenchi
In case I get killed off. Seriously...read his posts in isolation. More to come later (if I live).
i dontk' think rofl and walt used drunkenness as an excuse, but rather an explananation. there's a divergence between excuse, which admits culpability in intent, and misguided or -illaffected action. the former is inherentlyu scummy and will appear so, because it's offfered as an explanation to remove suspicion rather than an extension of clarity. thepopulartajo wrote:Why when you are wrong all of you use the drink excuse?Nuwen wrote:I'm an angry drinker.
LULZ.Nuwen wrote:i dontk' think rofl and walt used drunkenness as an excuse, but rather an explananation. there's a divergence between excuse, which admits culpability in intent, and misguided or -illaffected action. the former is inherentlyu scummy and will appear so, because it's offfered as an explanation to remove suspicion rather than an extension of clarity. thepopulartajo wrote:Why when you are wrong all of you use the drink excuse?Nuwen wrote:I'm an angry drinker.
walt just started using archaic contractions of 'it is' and 'it was.'
i don't remember what rofl didn, but it didn't seem like slipdrunk wriggling. i'll use my backreading time machine to confirm.
You are not making any sense. There is no extension of clarity in offering an excuse as oppossed to making a statement of explanation. There is only intent and purpose of a statement/action. One is an attempt to justify, the other to define. It is completely based and further rooted within the content of the subject matter. Your's was clearly an excuse;Nuwen wrote:i dontk' think rofl and walt used drunkenness as an excuse, but rather an explananation. there's a divergence between excuse, which admits culpability in intent, and misguided or -illaffected action. the former is inherentlyu scummy and will appear so, because it's offfered as an explanation to remove suspicion rather than an extension of clarity. thepopulartajo wrote:Why when you are wrong all of you use the drink excuse?Nuwen wrote:I'm an angry drinker.
walt just started using archaic contractions of 'it is' and 'it was.'
i don't remember what rofl didn, but it didn't seem like slipdrunk wriggling. i'll use my backreading time machine to confirm.
absolutely. top of list correlates to scummi°ness.Xylthixlm wrote:I demand a drunken scumlist immediately.
This is exactly what i said, or attempted to express. tajo asked a question; i answered it. very simple.WaltWishbone wrote:One is an attempt to justify, the other to define.
