populartajo wrote:
Answer my big post of accusations, plz.
populartajo wrote:
viqles wrote:rolf wrote:hoopla is also scum...
I really don't like people who make definitive statements like these - especially if there's no way that they could have any info.
We know, specially rolf, how much scum hate this type of statements.
viqles wrote:If you have suspicions, then present your argument. If you don't think people are convinced, then present it again - expand and clarify. Just repeating declaritive statements does not further the game...
FOS:copter
Nice FOS there.
Umm, thank you?
populartajo wrote:
vIQleS wrote:Shinnen_no_Me wrote:
vIQleS wrote:Random anything at this point has a 75% chance of hitting town.
How can you be so sure? That's a pretty solid number, you know. The only way you would know that is that you know how much scum there are, hence, you must be a scum as well.
Based on a standard mafia setup - 1 scum to 3 town. i.e. (as has already been mentioned) in a 12 player game you get 3 scum.
But that's ok - I forgive you...
Please, tell me Im not the only one seeing there is something stinky in this conversation. Considering that was the only comment Shinnen made about viq and how he suspected Kinetic, xyl and rolf/ARB later.
Not sure what your question to me is here....
populartajo wrote:
ABR wrote:viqles wrote:I really don't like people who make definitive statements like these - especially if there's no way that they could have any info.
If you have suspicions, then present your argument. If you don't think people are convinced, then present it again - expand and clarify. Just repeating declaritive statements does not further the game...
FOS:copter
How hypocritical. Why are you taking it out on copter, but not DGB?
OMG!
Is that addressed to me? Am I your God? You'd think you'd be a little bit nicer if I am...
populartajo wrote:
viqles wrote:I did notice DBG, but I didn't see it as quite so pernicious. If it makes you feel better - FOS:DBG. I'm still not attacking either of them
Actually, I think that scum tried to concentrate efforts on rolf. DGB's bussing is possible, though.
vIQleS wrote:Why are you defending roflcopter?
Lies.
136
populartajo wrote:
viqles wrote:Kin wrote:Assuming everything that is said about rage mechanics is true in this game, that means at most scum can only hold up to 3 rage points.
Did someone say that?Because I don't remember anyone else saying that... I'm going to bed - can someone check this please.
Weren't you scum in the last game?
732
populartajo wrote:
viqles wrote:I'm not going to argue the 75% crap anymore. I've answered the question and if you really need to grasp at straws at this point then you're out of your tiny little minds.
SO, ITS CRAP NOW? WHY WASNT IT WHEN SHINNEN BROUGHT IT?
It was crap when the first person mentioned it. I was being nice the first time. Now I'm sick of it.
I'm not even going to bother to link this...
populartajo wrote:
viqles wrote:Neither shine nor hoop are on my radar scum-wise.
At this point it seems the best option is to hurt one of them, and I expect I shall do so when I have ability back.
I will have to read carefully to see which of them I can build a case for. (If I can at all. If not I'll probably have to hurt Xyl)
Oh, yes, would it be too obvious if I hurt Shinnen?
There seems to be a ridiculous lack of questions in this tirade you're expecting me to 'answer'...
populartajo wrote:
viqles wrote:I read something that made me think that Shinnen was more likely town then hoopla (who seems fairly neutral at the mo.) but I can't remember what it was. I need to do some more reading.
I AM STILL WAITING.
Yes, yes you are. Although I expect you're the only one at this point.
I really don't see why this is still relevant. And, if you'd let me get on with reading instead of making me answer your retarded non-questions and address points that have been decisively and conclusively answered and dealt with, I might have been able to find it and get back to you by now.
I expect it had something to do with shinnen attacking someone that wasn't already under attack, and that a scum wouldn't be so obvious. I can't remember and I can't be bothered anymore.
populartajo wrote:
viqles wrote:Scummy to me at the moment:
Xyl
Kenetic
Rofl
ABR
I'm thinking DGB is less scummy then my last post - although my reasoning here could be flawed...
Reading to be done, then post more. Then hurting. Possibly Shinnen, just to see the kill and hence results. Then examine the bandwagon...
The fact that 4 of the players he thinks are scummier are players I think are town is strange.
purple monkey dishwasher
populartajo wrote:
viqles wrote:Fair call - if anyone thinks it still relevant, I'll try and have a look. Unfortunately I also have to work, as I've spent a considerable amount of time over the last few (work) days doing this instead of working and I don't want to get in trouble.
I'll try and do a read tonight. (I have a feeling that there was something that seemed like such a scummy thing to say that no one who was scum would say something like that. So it may turn out to be a bit WIFOM...)
LESS EXCUSES, PLUZ.
Bite me. I get hassled for 'lurking' and I get hassled for explaining why I'm not posting as much as I'd like... GFY.
populartajo wrote:
viqles wrote:Just checking in (skim read to catch up) to say that i'd really like to see a Juls lynch next.
That whole "when you kill me you'll see ABR...", and "don't kill ABR..." really bothers me.
It shouldnt. Explain why.
Explain why not...
populartajo wrote:
What happened to your other suspects, huh? Why didnt you hurt Hoopla?
1093
populartajo wrote:
viqles wrote:Well I don't. But then I didn't think Shinnen was scum either - and apparently there was some really huge scumtells that everyone else picked up on...
You raise a vaild point tho, so I'm going to be decisive and:
Hurt:Juls
Just because of the ABR following / defending. Just doesn't seem right to me.
Such a weak reason.
Happy?