Open 120 - Rebels in the Palace - Game Over! before 756

[Qanqan]

Will defend myself tomorrow...

[sekinj]

Vote Count 15

(# of votes against) Voted Player - by Voter(s)

(0) Empking
(0) veerus
(0) ortolan
(0) Qanqan
(0) Trumpet of Doom
(0) zwetschenwasser

Four (4) votes to Lynch.

[zwetschenwasser]

Emp, why did you vote for a nonexistent player?

[Qanqan]

So what am I getting voted for again?

[veerus]

Read ortolan's post.

[veerus]

fyi, see sig

[Qanqan]

Ok, I find it rediculous that ortolan is forcing this connection with me and Corvuus. Yes, I said he looked town, but so did Trumpet of Doom in 306, so did you. So why am I scum for my comment, and not you?

And those scumtactics of saying there was a link between me and corvuus, and then when I assumed you means because we were scumbuddies, you jump on me about therefore being his scumbuddy for interpereting it this way, that's rediculous. and so, I was ask again since you have avoided this question 3 times now;

You are both voting for TonyMontana, as I said. That's a bit of an obvious link there

How does me misinterpereting this vagueness make me scummy?

Also, how is 'Firstly, what does Corvuus have to do with me? ' an

extreme

reaction to being associated with Corvuus, as you said. What is so extreme about it?

[ortolan]

Ok, I find it rediculous that ortolan is forcing this connection with me and Corvuus. Yes, I said he looked town, but so did Trumpet of Doom in 306, so did you. So why am I scum for my comment, and not you?

This shows you didn't read my post 436. Please read it again. My comment about finding him the most townie was not genuine, as I explained. The point about Trumpet of Doom is noted, I didn't notice that.

And those scumtactics of saying there was a link between me and corvuus, and then when I assumed you means because we were scumbuddies, you jump on me about therefore being his scumbuddy for interpereting it this way, that's rediculous. and so, I was ask again since you have avoided this question 3 times now;

You are both voting for TonyMontana, as I said. That's a bit of an obvious link there

How does me misinterpereting this vagueness make me scummy?

Also, how is 'Firstly, what does Corvuus have to do with me? ' an

extreme

reaction to being associated with Corvuus, as you said. What is so extreme about it?

This, again, was all answered in 436. In 340 I did not draw any link between you beyond asking you about the the reasoning for your vote on TonyMontana (because you were both voting for him at the time). You reply with the extremely defensive reaction "WHAT DO I HAVE TO DO WITH CORVUUS???" You were so sensitive to being linked with him you took offence to it even though I hadn't actually linked you together.

You continuing to try and project the illusion I am not answering your questions is in itself scummy.

[Qanqan]

Could you quote me where in 436 you showed me

how

your vague comment supposedly proves that I am scum, or at least explain, rather than just saying 'that it does because it happened'.

And you aren't answering one of my questions.

[Empking]

Emp, why did you vote for a nonexistent player?

I forgot he was replaced.

[zwetschenwasser]

Vote: Qangan

In light of his recent over-defensive moves.

[Qanqan]

They weren't over defensive at all, just because ort says they were, doesn't mean they are. He is purposefully blowing this out of proportion to get me lynched.

[ortolan]

And you aren't answering one of my questions.

Which?

[ortolan]

and who do you think is the guard/king pair and why Qanqan?

[Qanqan]

Could you quote me where in 436 you showed me

how

your vague comment supposedly proves that I am scum, or at least explain, rather than just saying 'that it does because it happened'.

Could you quote me where in 436 you showed me

how

your vague comment supposedly proves that I am scum, or at least explain, rather than just saying 'that it does because it happened'.

Could you quote me where in 436 you showed me

how

your vague comment supposedly proves that I am scum, or at least explain, rather than just saying 'that it does because it happened'.

Could you quote me where in 436 you showed me

how

your vague comment supposedly proves that I am scum, or at least explain, rather than just saying 'that it does because it happened'.

Could you quote me where in 436 you showed me

how

your vague comment supposedly proves that I am scum, or at least explain, rather than just saying 'that it does because it happened'.

(I'm hoping if I say it five times, maybe you will actually answer it)

[zwetschenwasser]

If Qangan is the king, we win.
If Qangan is a rebel, we lynch Ort tomorrow (king, probably)
If Qangan is a guard, we discuss more tomorrow.

It's pretty much a win-null-null situation.

[ortolan]

Could you quote me where in 436 you showed me

how

your vague comment supposedly proves that I am scum, or at least explain, rather than just saying 'that it does because it happened'.

What "vague comment" are you referring to? In case we're still talking about your sensitivity to being linked with Corvuus:

This, again, was all answered in 436. In 340 I did not draw any link between you beyond asking you about the the reasoning for your vote on TonyMontana (because you were both voting for him at the time). You reply with the extremely defensive reaction "WHAT DO I HAVE TO DO WITH CORVUUS???" You were so sensitive to being linked with him you took offence to it even though I hadn't actually linked you together.

If you mean something else say so. Quote the specific part of my post you disagree with and tell me why. Also nothing I've said "proves" you're scum, I have given several good reasons for suspecting you however.

I will also ask that you post a suspicions list of who the guard and king are (because they are who you're supposed to be looking for if you're town), and give your reasoning for why they are so. Failure to do so, if you are indeed town, will jeopardise your chances of winning by making you more likely to get lynched.

If Qangan is a rebel, we lynch Ort tomorrow (king, probably)

This doesn't follow.

[Qanqan]

You are both voting for TonyMontana, as I said. That's a bit of an obvious link there

that vague comment

[zwetschenwasser]

Ort, we're not going to have many leads tomorrow if there is a tomorrow. Pushing a mislynch is about the only scumtell we could possibly have tomorrow.

[ortolan]

Stop being scummy, zwet.

I am not even advocating his lynch yet, plus you know for a fact I can't be the king because Corvuus was more than happy to attack me and line me up for a lynch (plus I'm the only one who's caught any scum so far).

[quote=(467)"]You are both voting for TonyMontana, as I said. That's a bit of an obvious link there

that vague comment[/quote]

The fact you were both voting for TonyMontana was technically a connection. So that's another reason why saying "omgosh what do I have to do with Corvuus" was scummy.

Now please tell us who you think the guard and king are (and why) or you'll really be screwing us up if you're town.

[Empking]

Vote: Veerus

- the king would hide.

[zwetschenwasser]

I'm leaning veerusking with Quanganguard at the moment.

[sekinj]

TonyMontana replaces veerus.

[sekinj]

Deadline: March 31st 2009, 12:00 PM CST

[TonyMontana]

vote: zwet

-.-