Apologies. Got caught up this week.
Zer0ph34r Post 605 wrote:I wanted to see who would catch it, it may seem untrue, but I wanted to see who was actually paying attention, and as a result, only one person mentioned it.
And don, I tried investigating killaseven for suspicion of scum. And by the way, does anyone have a suggestion as to who I should investigate tonight?
You wanted to know who was paying attention?
Looks to me like you need to be the one who is paying attention. You
still
haven't given us any thoughts on the SK situation with Ac we have going.
Porkens Post 610 wrote:Herod wrote:
I'm finding Don is asking/suggesting seemingly innocuous questions to which the scum would want to know the answers more than the town would. If Zero is telling the truth, I don't see what information we can derive from his selection, but the scum might figure he'll try the same target again. If he's lying, I don't know whether stating a particular target would likely help us to figure that out (though I suppose it might.)
I could be wrong about the usefulness of knowing his selection, and I also don't yet know Don's motive. Just pointing this out.
I, personally, wanted him to answer to see if he continued to make absolutely no sense at all.
He didn't disappoint.
So making no sense = scum to you? Do you really think a scum would make this kinda play right now, especially seeing that no one was actively looking in his direction. I had asked him to actually participate in the convo, but no one was making cases on him.
It just screams confused/out of depth townie to me.
don_johnson Post 611 wrote:can't hurt to know. mafia is a game of connecting the dots as the corpses pile up. unfortunately, zero is connecting himself to a dead townie. does seem par for the course.
i guess i'm okay if someone would like to claim roleblocker. it could play to our favor now.
Do you think Zero is telling the truth?
Jazzmyn wrote:Anyway, I asked previously whether it is normal to have a role such as a paranoid cop in a mini normal game where there is already another cop, and a couple of you seem to have indicated that it is possible. Has anyone ever played in a 12 player game with two cops? I haven't completed very many 12 player games yet so I'm just not sure how common or how rare it might be.
No I haven't. Although I have played a 10 player game with 2 cops (don't ask horribly balanced)
Jazzmyn Post 618 wrote:Looker wrote:vote jazzmyn
Awesome - something new to talk about. Welcome aboard, Looker.
Regards,
Jazz
Awesome? That's a strange reaction.
Herodotus Post 621 wrote:don_johnson wrote:i guess i'm okay if someone would like to claim roleblocker. it could play to our favor now.
THERE! AGAIN!
Seriously, you might have a pro-town reason for wanting to know this, but do you have any explanation for why it's okay to inform the scum who, if anyone, has this role? And what the town has to gain from a claim? Maybe start with that explanation,
then
invite someone to claim. Or, if you're mafia, please keep doing what you're doing. Or just claim.
This is a good point. Not sure what a RB claiming at this point would do to help us, or even
if
there is one at this point.
don_johnson Post 622 wrote:claims can help to clear things up. if we are not going to lynch acfan then we need to do something. a roleblocker claim narrows down our targets for lynch and gives us the option to test acfan's claim by blocking him.
Yeah but it also gives the scum more info. Considering that Zero looked into a dead player, we don't need to clear up anything.
Looker Post 628 wrote:...thanks! Since I voted you for no reason, I would like to give you the pleasure of informing me who, out of the following five, you think is scummy (and why).
erratus, don_johnson, zer0ph, scotty, herodotus
Umm this is a good question and all, but I would like to know your feelings on the players in this game since you just replaced in. I would also like to know the reasons for a Jazz vote.
Porkens Post 633 wrote:Looker and Zer0 for maf.
Why?
Herodotus Post 634 wrote:Porkens wrote:Looker and Zer0 for maf.
Tovarish's last post makes him/Looker look relatively pro-town. He asked the mod to replace Killer -- if that had happened, the Killer lynch would have been much less likely.
Oh please. He may have done that but he made sure to leave his vote on Killa when he did. If he wanted a replacement so bad he would have unvoted he just said that for appearances I think.
That post got him scum points from me, not town.
Porkens Post 639 wrote:Sotty7 wrote:I'm not voting because I'm torn on what to do right now.
Non-commital
We have one replacement, I'm more than willing to let him catch up with us all
. Withholding opinions and ideas until someone else speaks for reasons I can't understand.[/b]
In the mean time I will probably have to give the last few pages another read.
I'll believe it when I see it; classic scum active lurking.
I'm not sure what to think about Zero's half assed cop claim. Scum coming out like he did really makes little sense.
Town coming out like that makes little sense
Maybe we have two cops. One for mafia, one for the SK? Right now I'm not sure. [/b] whats the competing hypothesis?[/b]
Zero really needs to come back in here and you know.. Start making some sense. That would be helpful.
pointless and obviously not going to happen
1) I have already stated once in the thread (
Post 550) that I am willing to vote Ac. As of right now, he is still my top suspect.
2) Well before this post I was adding to the discussion active lurking is a harsh conclusion to draw. That said, I can't really defend this point because I have been missing the last few days and I haven't done the re-read.
3) Scum coming out like that makes no sense. Especially with a dead cop already.
4) Not sure what you mean here. Could you explain?
5) Well yeah... Maybe you're right. But that doesn't mean we shouldn't try.