Mini 753 - Really Deep South (Game over!)

charter · Post Post #425 (ISO) » Sat Mar 21, 2009 8:47 am

What?

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #426 (ISO) » Sat Mar 21, 2009 11:00 am

Are you staking your reputation that vollkan is scum and I don't need to worry about CarnCarn?

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #427 (ISO) » Sat Mar 21, 2009 11:00 am

I'm only just trying to read between the lines.

charter · Post Post #428 (ISO) » Sat Mar 21, 2009 3:02 pm

I wouldn't put any stock in my reputation. I bet my mafia career someone was scum in a just finished game and lost (still won the game, but I don't have a mafia career anymore).

But yeah, pretty sure vollkan is scum.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #429 (ISO) » Sat Mar 21, 2009 4:13 pm

That's not good enough for me to hammer vollkan and let CarnCarn off the hook.

charter · Post Post #430 (ISO) » Sat Mar 21, 2009 4:23 pm

That's fine, just letting someone else have all the glory for themselves.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #431 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2009 1:36 am

UNNOFFICIAL

vollkan 2 (charter, CarnCarn, Skander)
CarnCarn 1 (DGB)

Not voting - vollkan, farside, Kison

7 remaining, 4 to lynch.

============
I'm worried to see both charter and CarnCarn on the vollkan wagon. Where is farside, where is Kison? When is the deadline?

Prod: farside, Kison
Mod: When is deadline?

farside22 · Post Post #432 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2009 4:43 am

I'm typically gone during the weekends.

Sigh I don't like the Volkan wagon. I can't imagine why ABR would buss his scum partner on crap like what was being said day one on Volkan.

I had hope to have information at this point from someone.

ISO · Post Post #433 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2009 5:33 am

I'm ~ halfway through reading.

Vollkan, would you mind providing one of those tasty report cards? I scanned over your posts and have not yet seen one, and considering you're in defense mode both where I am reading, and at the present point in the game, I'm expecting you're withheld opinions of some players.

farside22 · Post Post #434 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2009 6:33 am

I've been thinking and I would rather seen Carn lynched or claiming at this point.

vote: Carn

charter · Post Post #435 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2009 6:38 am

DGB, what do you make of farside's complete reversal on her stance on vollkan and now her searching for more roleclaims?

farside22 · Post Post #436 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2009 6:40 am

charter wrote:DGB, what do you make of farside's complete reversal on her stance on vollkan and now her searching for more roleclaims?

What reversal? I've been saying Volkan bussing from ABR looks bad from the start.

Quotes if you going to make comments like this.

farside22 · Post Post #437 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2009 6:42 am

By the by if you are talking about this:

farside22 wrote:DGB do you have anything to say about anything? I'm going to hold off on the hammer till DGB has her say.

Because I decided not to hammer? Well excuse me for noting agreeing with a case I haven't liked from the get go.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #438 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2009 7:05 am

charter wrote:DGB, what do you make of farside's complete reversal on her stance on vollkan and now her searching for more roleclaims?

Any particular reason why you worry that lurkerscum CarnCarn is pressured?

charter · Post Post #439 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2009 7:13 am

farside22 wrote:It's possible looking at DGB's quote that it would explain the action of why rolf. A couple of issues I have at this moment. I feel 2 people are scum with a possible 3rd at this point

Korts/ tajo (very high)
charter
volkan

Volkan stated the following:
I'd forgotten all about Panama...until now :Evil:

On the other hand, I am firmly of the view that Millers should claim as early as possible (and this is early enough).

Easily believes without question the miller claim.
charter found the discussion unncecessary and Korts believed it as well. None of these 3 have hammered Neko at this point and none are voting for him.

farside22 wrote:DGB do you have anything to say about anything? I'm going to hold off on the hammer till DGB has her say.

These gave me the impression you found vollkan scummy.

farside wrote:Because I decided not to hammer? Well excuse me for noting agreeing with a case I haven't liked from the get go.

Umm, sorry, but what you said before definately implied you were willing to hammer. You're now trying to say you were waiting on DGB to hammer before, but now you're saying you didn't agree with a vollkan lynch then? Why didn't you say "I don't agree with a vollkan lynch" instead of "I'm going to hold off on the hammer"?

DrippingGoofball wrote:
charter wrote:DGB, what do you make of farside's complete reversal on her stance on vollkan and now her searching for more roleclaims?
Any particular reason why you worry that lurkerscum CarnCarn is pressured?

Yes, because it lets vollkansuperduperscum live longer.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #440 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2009 7:18 am

And you're that confident that CarnCarn isn't superduperlurkerscum?

charter · Post Post #441 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2009 7:22 am

Check his post history, it's not just this game he's lurking in, so yes, I am.

farside22 · Post Post #442 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2009 7:23 am

charter wrote:
farside22 wrote:It's possible looking at DGB's quote that it would explain the action of why rolf. A couple of issues I have at this moment. I feel 2 people are scum with a possible 3rd at this point

Korts/ tajo (very high)
charter
volkan

Volkan stated the following:
I'd forgotten all about Panama...until now :Evil:

On the other hand, I am firmly of the view that Millers should claim as early as possible (and this is early enough).

Easily believes without question the miller claim.
charter found the discussion unncecessary and Korts believed it as well. None of these 3 have hammered Neko at this point and none are voting for him.

farside22 wrote:DGB do you have anything to say about anything? I'm going to hold off on the hammer till DGB has her say.
These gave me the impression you found vollkan scummy.
farside wrote:Because I decided not to hammer? Well excuse me for noting agreeing with a case I haven't liked from the get go.
Umm, sorry, but what you said before definately implied you were willing to hammer. You're now trying to say you were waiting on DGB to hammer before, but now you're saying you didn't agree with a vollkan lynch then? Why didn't you say "I don't agree with a vollkan lynch" instead of "I'm going to hold off on the hammer"?
DrippingGoofball wrote:
charter wrote:DGB, what do you make of farside's complete reversal on her stance on vollkan and now her searching for more roleclaims?
Any particular reason why you worry that lurkerscum CarnCarn is pressured?
Yes, because it lets vollkansuperduperscum live longer.

Yes but I found your actions scummy and Korts scummy. I was wrong about Korts so I get to second guess myself.
As for the hammer I just don't like the case. i was hoping DGB would have something substancial to state when she came on. She didn't I'm not thrilled with that nothing comment right now.

I'm curious to know why charter seems certain Volkan is scum now. It leaves a bad taste and not the I'm rolefishing type thing where I usually feel someone is being honest to me type thing. This is the I'm trying to lynch someone I know to be scum since I'm scum type thing.

DGB will you mind if I test a theory here I hope.

unvote:
vote: Volkan

FOS: charter

no matter volkan's alignment I'm looking at you next.

charter · Post Post #443 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2009 7:27 am

DGB, what alignment do you think farside has now?

farside22 · Post Post #444 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2009 7:29 am

charter wrote:DGB, what alignment do you think farside has now?

Please your manic Volkan is scum I'm betting scum bussing or mislynch. Either way I'm betting scum on you.
DGB actually knows better. I'm sure someone else reading knows as well better. What you got buddy?

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #445 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2009 7:30 am

Totally 100% confirmed no-doubt-about-it town.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #446 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2009 7:31 am

DrippingGoofball wrote:Totally 100% confirmed no-doubt-about-it town.

Ninja'd.

That was my response to charter asking for my thoughts on farside's alignment.

farside22 · Post Post #447 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2009 7:31 am

DrippingGoofball wrote:Totally 100% confirmed no-doubt-about-it town.

I'm getting better about bread crumbing don't you think.

Can I ask why you haven't done anything yet?

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #448 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2009 7:34 am

If vollkan is scum, I'd guess he didn't make the kill, given how suspicious he's been.

charter · Post Post #449 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2009 7:35 am

farside22 wrote:
charter wrote:DGB, what alignment do you think farside has now?
Please your manic Volkan is scum I'm betting scum bussing or mislynch. Either way I'm betting scum on you.
DGB actually knows better. I'm sure someone else reading knows as well better. What you got buddy?

unvote, vote farside

So regardless of vollkan's alignment, I am scum to you? You still vote vollkan though? You only vote vollkan again after I call you out on it, but you think I'm scum and the wagon on him is rubbish? Looks like this one is in the bag. (also add her inquisition about ABR's claim but didn't vote him over it)