War in Heaven II - Spirit of Vengeance (Over!)

The Fonz · Post Post #400 (ISO) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 9:31 am

OK so.

Right. We have three players below normal. I want everyone to hurt one of them. You know, if it weren't for that stupid-ass heal-up plan, we'd be well on our way to a death here.

And does anyone else look at that ViQ/Walt mutual heal and think 'Surely they can't be that obvious, can they?'

q21 · Post Post #401 (ISO) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 9:36 am

Kinetic wrote: Who is left...

Drench, Juls, q21, zwet, Tenchi

Actively lurking much? Not liking it. I'd appreciate a little more activity.

If I'm active lurking, so are you. I have one less post than you (the same with this post included) and so far as I know I haven't been non-committal, vapid, wishy-washy or reactive. Just because I don't throw as much shit around as some people, doesn't mean I'm lurking.

zwetschenwasser wrote:IMO, this game is exploding too fast. I can barely keep up with it.

Complaining about the pace of play being to fast when fast play is exactly what the town needs. Scummy.

Hasn't made a post longer than two lines so far this game. Scummy.

zwetschenwasser wrote:
Hurt: Xyl
He's relegated to posting one-liners in an attempt to look townier.

Extra scummy considering all you've ever posted is one liners with a smattering of two liners.

Xylthixlm wrote:Okay. We don't have the luxury of taking as long as we would in a normal game here.

EVERYONE MUST CLAIM WHO THEY WANT TO DIE FIRST IN THEIR NEXT POST.

I'm tempted not to do this, just because you suggested it and I hate being told what to do. But I won't be that childish.

Unvote ABR
Call intent to hurt Zwet.

The Fonz · Post Post #402 (ISO) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 9:40 am

I'd rather you limited yourself to existing wagons, q21. At least, unless someone decides to back you in the next 12 hours.

q21 · Post Post #403 (ISO) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 9:44 am

Fair enough, I'll back Xyl above any of the other two unless, as you mentioned, someone backs my intent in the very near future. If they don't I will simply pursue Zwet in the next aeon.

Seraphim · Post Post #404 (ISO) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 9:52 am

I have no idea why people think Xyl is scum. I've been reading nothing but town intent from him especially since he's going out of his way to make heal/hurt counts. If he was scum, he'd be a lot more aggressive and attempt to bullshit the town with useless information.

q21, I'll back you on zwet. The hurt on Xyl(as far as I can tell, there is no case), the reasoning for his hurt(one-liners, WTF, hypocrisy at its finest), and his active lurking(my town meta on him says that his short posts would be made more often if he was town) all add up to scum right now.

If this is not the best option, I think I would still back a Walt kill. His latest posts scream scum to me.

Xylthixlm · Post Post #405 (ISO) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 9:57 am

Seraphim wrote:I have no idea why people think Xyl is scum. I've been reading nothing but town intent from him especially since he's going out of his way to make heal/hurt counts. If he was scum, he'd be a lot more aggressive and attempt to bullshit the town with useless information.

Hell no. If I was scum I'd be lurking more, and probably supporting populartajo's vote plan. That would slow down the game enough to glide to an easy scum win.

Seraphim · Post Post #406 (ISO) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:00 am

Clarification: What I meant by "aggressive" was "flailing". You'd be attacking more targets with less justification. Also, Xyl, would you be willing to support a zwet kill right now?

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #407 (ISO) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:04 am

q21 wrote:Fair enough, I'll back Xyl above any of the other two unless, as you mentioned, someone backs my intent in the very near future. If they don't I will simply pursue Zwet in the next aeon.

Will you back a hoopla hurt?

Xylthixlm · Post Post #408 (ISO) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:05 am

Seraphim wrote:Clarification: What I meant by "aggressive" was "flailing". You'd be attacking more targets with less justification. Also, Xyl, would you be willing to support a zwet kill right now?

I'm busy killing WaltWishbone here. I want to say zwet is scum, but I think that's just an OMGUS reaction.

q21 · Post Post #409 (ISO) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:12 am

Albert B. Rampage wrote:
q21 wrote:Fair enough, I'll back Xyl above any of the other two unless, as you mentioned, someone backs my intent in the very near future. If they don't I will simply pursue Zwet in the next aeon.
Will you back a hoopla hurt?

Yes. But my own hurt is hereby directed at zwet.

Hurt zwetshenwasser

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #410 (ISO) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:17 am

The Fonz wrote:
Hoopla wrote:
I'll heal, we need to stop hurting until we select a kill.

Heal: Kinetic
MASSIVELY ANTITOWN SOMEONE CALL A HURT ON HIM PLEASE.

roflcopter wrote:right, hoopla dies right after kinetic

DrippingGoofball wrote:
roflcopter wrote:right, hoopla dies right after kinetic
I'd kinda put hoopla before kinetic after the last few posts.

q21 wrote:
Albert B. Rampage wrote:
q21 wrote:Fair enough, I'll back Xyl above any of the other two unless, as you mentioned, someone backs my intent in the very near future. If they don't I will simply pursue Zwet in the next aeon.
Will you back a hoopla hurt?
Yes. But my own hurt is hereby directed at zwet.

Hurt Hoopla

Hoopla don't hurt me back unless you get support from at least 4 players to do so. Anything else would be extremely anti-town.

Xylthixlm · Post Post #411 (ISO) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:20 am

Arrrrgggghhhhh.

Seraphim · Post Post #412 (ISO) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:22 am

Alright then.

The clouds clear and a lightning quick figure suddenly shows up with a giant bow made of lightning. He fires an arrow, shooting and hitting a nearby figure. "DIE SCUM!" yells the angel, readying another arrow.

Hurt Zwetshenwasser

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #413 (ISO) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:23 am

Xylthixlm wrote:Arrrrgggghhhhh.

I don't understand your case against Walt. He isn't even lurking anymore.

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #414 (ISO) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:29 am

q21 wrote:
zwetschenwasser wrote:IMO, this game is exploding too fast. I can barely keep up with it.
Complaining about the pace of play being to fast when fast play is exactly what the town needs. Scummy.

Hasn't made a post longer than two lines so far this game. Scummy.

zwetschenwasser wrote:
Hurt: Xyl
He's relegated to posting one-liners in an attempt to look townier.
Extra scummy considering all you've ever posted is one liners with a smattering of two liners.

Is this the totality of the case against zwet?

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #415 (ISO) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:30 am

Juls wrote:
Hurt: Xyl

This game is unorganized. Good job scum.

FOS Juls

Your case against Xyl is OMGUS, he isn't even pursuing his attacks against you. You have yet to contribute anything else.

Xylthixlm · Post Post #416 (ISO) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:32 am

Albert B. Rampage wrote:
Xylthixlm wrote:Arrrrgggghhhhh.
I don't understand your case against Walt. He isn't even lurking anymore.

It's not the specifics, it's the fact that we now have five injured people.

Seraphim · Post Post #417 (ISO) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:33 am

The case on zwet goes like this:

1. His posts have even less content than usual.

2. All of his posts attack Xyl

3. Obvious buddying with Juls. When Juls started hurting Xyl, guess who was right behind?

4. My town meta on Zwet says that he is scum on him.

5. His hypocritical hurt of Xyl

6. The fact that he can't keep up with the game even though all his posts sound rushed.

Seraphim · Post Post #418 (ISO) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:35 am

Intent to heal: Xyl

There is no case on him and the people attacking him have no basis and are some of the scummier players in the game. If Zwet flips scum, Juls is next.

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #419 (ISO) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:36 am

Xylthixlm wrote:It's not the specifics, it's the fact that we now have five injured people.

I don't give a fuck.

zwet case --> too light.
ward case --> non-existent.
shinen case --> no one is backing it except me and Fonz
Xyl case --> non-existent

None of these are good options. Therefore I'm going to hurt someone who

1) I think is scum and

2) has decent support.

Seraphim · Post Post #420 (ISO) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:37 am

I could support a Hoopla hurt if someone could point out the case to me. I don't fully understand it.

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #421 (ISO) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:40 am

Seraphim wrote:I could support a Hoopla hurt if someone could point out the case to me. I don't fully understand it.

If you're pro-town, I suggest you read her posts in isolation and come up with your own conclusion. You might or might not agree with me, but at least you would have done your homework. No offense.

Seraphim · Post Post #422 (ISO) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:43 am

I've been doing that a lot lately in this game. I can see that there's a lot of support for it and not all of it can be scum-support, so there's definitely weight to the case. The problem is I'm not sure what the exact case is.

And I take no offense. I've had people say a lot worse to me about my playstyle.

q21 · Post Post #423 (ISO) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:46 am

Albert B. Rampage wrote:
q21 wrote:
zwetschenwasser wrote:IMO, this game is exploding too fast. I can barely keep up with it.
Complaining about the pace of play being to fast when fast play is exactly what the town needs. Scummy.

Hasn't made a post longer than two lines so far this game. Scummy.

zwetschenwasser wrote:
Hurt: Xyl
He's relegated to posting one-liners in an attempt to look townier.
Extra scummy considering all you've ever posted is one liners with a smattering of two liners.
Is this the totality of the case against zwet?

He's a non-contributing hypocrite who complains that a game the town needs to play quickly is being played too quickly. There needs to be more? There is also the fact that while other players under suspicion have something town points somewhere along the line, zwet has none.

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #424 (ISO) » Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:46 am

Seraphim wrote:I've been doing that a lot lately in this game. I can see that there's a lot of support for it and not all of it can be scum-support, so there's definitely weight to the case. The problem is I'm not sure what the exact case is.

And I take no offense. I've had people say a lot worse to me about my playstyle.

All I've seen you doing this game is agree or disagree with someone else's analysis/PbPa. I want you to do your own definitive, independent analysis on at least hoopla whom you are curious about.