(
History of votes on freeko:
L-6: Fishy - 143.
L-5: DDD - 183Fishythefish wrote: I think this attack is another stretch from freeko, going too hard after a light-hearted post.
{...}
All in all, I think freeko’s attack on DDD is overdone.
Because I think his attacks are contrived,
vote: freeko
L-6: Fishy - 212. Unvoted, placed vote on DDD.Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:I've Given you chance after chance to repond to my accusations and arguments in a fair fashion, because I believe that's best for the town, but you seem to have absolutely no interest in open dialogue and merely continue to parrot the same tired lines. Ultimately, your unwillingness or inability to defend yourself and your points leads me to one course of action. So...
Unvote
Vote: Freeko
L-5: Howard - 227
L-4: Light-Kun - 230HowardRoark wrote:vote freeko
I see this as distancing since there has been no real interaction with DraketheFake even though there has been some questionable play from him. He even states that DraketheFake's play is at least as poor as Debonair Danny DiPietro . . .freeko (102) wrote:im gonna be watching you, drake.Meanwhile they are both on the Debonair Danny DiPietro BW.freeko (122) wrote:you are quantifying your play thru Drake as being town because it is apparently terrible. I can agree that it is terrible.
Light-kun wrote:{...}
Unvote; Vote Freeko
I believe his last post is scumhunting, thus your post is a lie.
- (confirming vote, more case in 244)
L-3: Fishy - 271Light-kun wrote:I call "I win with town" as a plea to majority, which is scummy in my book.
I was getting a slight "survivor" vibe off of him, but if he were, I'm pretty sure claiming it would result in his lynch anyway. And...
Hm... You still lie, you still say he did zero scum hunting. I see some.
Vote Freeko
L-2: Nuwen - 288Fishythefish wrote:I agree that freeko's position has turned into a nonsense. freeko, you need to seriously reconsider your position on DDD. You are suffering from extreme confirmation bias, in which you automatically see DDD's posts nonsense. 262 reads like it is a token attempt to look like you are open-minded, without any actual intention of reconsidering your position. You are actively harming your case against DDD. You read like a scum desperately trying to get a townie lynched, or a hopelessly tunnelled townie.
unvote, vote freeko
Nuwen wrote: Did you really just ignore the brunt of this page's posts in favor of ad homming our newer replacement?
Really?
Vote: Freeko- L-2
Nuwen wrote: 1. An ad hom attack took precedence over addressing real questions. Ad homs are unacceptably anti-town to begin with - Freeko is attempting to counter HR's posts by insulting them. Prioritizing that over all else compounds anti-town behavior upon anti-town behavior.
2. Rather than accepting opinion as opinion ("I personally support the RVS as the only effective way to start a game"), Freeko is ensuring that every statement in this game has a binary value: correct or incorrect. According to freeko, the contents and basis of every case against him are either dumb or blatantly 'incorrect.'
3. Freeko's case on DDD originally seemed sincere, but has since been wraithed into a single-minded assault with the intention of lynching DDD at any cost.
L-1: DtF - 308Nuwen wrote: {...}
His single-minded focus on DDD, emotional statements like "So if I am going to be lynched. Im going to be lynched for being an ass to everyone. NO one really cares about my alignment in the game" definitely seal my suspicion.
DraketheFake wrote: How much fun is it going to be for you to read the equivalent of 7 other players collectively shrugging their shoulders and pointing to how abrasive and useless you've been all day?
freeko wrote:Nothing I do is ever rational.Vote: freeko. L-1, etc.
- (earlier noteworthy post at 276)
DraketheFake wrote:Ugh. This this this.Fishythefish wrote:You are actively harming your case against DDD.You read like a scum desperately trying to get a townie lynched, or a hopelessly tunnelled townie.
But I don't know that I agree with your vote.It seems that both instances are equally likely, and freeko is the sort of hypothetical townie that a scum being wagoned love to have pop up.Which isn't a strike against DDD, obviously, but these sorts of interactions are rarely good for the town unless he really is just a scum playing in a bizarre fashion.
- Want to note 309 too.
Fake Hammer: Freeko - 314.DraketheFake wrote:Forgot this gem. As a scum player you wouldn't want to have players voting for you, which means that you mightfreeko wrote:Why would I as a scum player want to have people voting for me jackass?stop being an abrasive douchebag and actually play the goddamn gamein order to avoid having even more votes put on you. And no, repeatedly whining about DDD "backpedaling" doesn't count as playing.
freeko wrote:vote freeko
Bite me.
L-2: Howard - 319orangepenguin wrote:freeko DID NOT unvote before he voted. He is still at L-1.
L-1: Howard - 325.HowardRoark wrote:unvote freeko
I want to take away the chance of the self vote hammer. My hopes? That if you are town, freeko, that you share any other insights that you have.
Hammer: Jere 329HowardRoark wrote:Backtrack.
SOLD!
vote freeko
The initial claim request: Nuwen - 311JereIC wrote:Screw it
Vote: freeko
hohum - 1 (Light-kun)
Not Voting - 8 (Jazzmyn, HowardRoark, Nuwen, hohum, Fishythefish, JereIC, DraketheFake, na85)
9 alive, 5 to lynch.
-Mod
(Vote Count accurate as of Post 408)