Mini 761 - Game Over

Amished · Post Post #25 (ISO) » Tue Mar 17, 2009 3:05 am

Neither did I...

I also wasn't aware of a remake concerning Wall-E.

Also as the first person to get 2 votes, I think it's ironic that the Amish person gets a wagon built against him.... Are you all prejudiced against the Amish?

......... >_>

Debonair Danny DiPietro · Post Post #26 (ISO) » Tue Mar 17, 2009 3:08 am

Would you prefer if we built a barn against you instead?

Pitstop · Post Post #27 (ISO) » Tue Mar 17, 2009 3:51 am

/confirm I got my PM.

Lots of pointless voting I see.

Zachrulez · Post Post #28 (ISO) » Tue Mar 17, 2009 4:12 am

Pitstop wrote:/confirm I got my PM.

Lots of pointless voting I see.

Indeed, let's make a vote that has a point.

Unvote, Vote : Pitstop

alexhans · Post Post #29 (ISO) » Tue Mar 17, 2009 4:23 am

Pitstop wrote:/confirm I got my PM.

Lots of pointless voting I see.

What do you expect? This IS random stage after all... We have not real info yet...

But hopefully we will all keep posting until something comes up...

AshKetchummm · Post Post #30 (ISO) » Tue Mar 17, 2009 4:30 am

Did someone say Amish wagon?

Amished · Post Post #31 (ISO) » Tue Mar 17, 2009 4:47 am

Well, a barn raising is a much better way to get to know everybody, so that would be rather nice. It's helpful to the community too!

Stephoscope · Post Post #32 (ISO) » Tue Mar 17, 2009 4:55 am

Amished wrote:Well, a barn raising is a much better way to get to know everybody, so that would be rather nice. It's helpful to the community too!

"Raise" and "raze" are not only homophones, but also antonyms. Discuss.

Wall-E · Post Post #33 (ISO) » Tue Mar 17, 2009 5:26 am

Wall-E wrote:Zachrules: He's dragging a grudge from another game into this one (admittedly, it could be construed as a joke, but that's one of those things one can't know for sure) which is anti-town.

IGMEOdanny-boy.

This was my reason for my vote. I said your grudge was anti-town, which you would have noticed if you'd read all my posts. Did you not see this post, Zach?

Zachrulez · Post Post #34 (ISO) » Tue Mar 17, 2009 5:30 am

Wall-E wrote:
Wall-E wrote:Zachrules: He's dragging a grudge from another game into this one (admittedly, it could be construed as a joke, but that's one of those things one can't know for sure) which is anti-town.

IGMEOdanny-boy.
This was my reason for my vote. I said your grudge was anti-town, which you would have noticed if you'd read all my posts. Did you not see this post, Zach?

Your point fails, there is no grudge.

Wall-E · Post Post #35 (ISO) » Tue Mar 17, 2009 5:50 am

Zachrulez wrote:No, it's actually because I am married to one of the people you killed in newbie 727.

Your vote demonstrably WAS grudge-fueled. Why the denial?

Zachrulez · Post Post #36 (ISO) » Tue Mar 17, 2009 5:56 am

Wall-E wrote:
Zachrulez wrote:No, it's actually because I am married to one of the people you killed in newbie 727.
Your vote demonstrably WAS grudge-fueled. Why the denial?

Or it was me telling him that I have an indirect familiarity with him because I followed a game where he killed my wife on night one.

There's no grudge. He didn't even win that game. Your point sucks. Your attempt to push it sucks even more so.

ryan2754 · Post Post #37 (ISO) » Tue Mar 17, 2009 6:28 am

The remake was the cartoon version.

Amished · Post Post #38 (ISO) » Tue Mar 17, 2009 6:30 am

Raise and raze are just one of many examples that the makers of the English language are fools. They're obviously newbie scum, trying to make us confused and go after each other. Lynch all English! (I'm American

)

/looks for British people in game....

Wall-E · Post Post #39 (ISO) » Tue Mar 17, 2009 6:49 am

Zachrulez wrote:
Wall-E wrote:
Zachrulez wrote:No, it's actually because I am married to one of the people you killed in newbie 727.
Your vote demonstrably WAS grudge-fueled. Why the denial?
Or it was me telling him that I have an indirect familiarity with him because I followed a game where he killed my wife on night one.

There's no grudge. He didn't even win that game. Your point sucks. Your attempt to push it sucks even more so.

At this point it's more about your backpedaling.

Zachrulez · Post Post #40 (ISO) » Tue Mar 17, 2009 6:57 am

Wall-E wrote:
Zachrulez wrote:
Wall-E wrote:
Zachrulez wrote:No, it's actually because I am married to one of the people you killed in newbie 727.
Your vote demonstrably WAS grudge-fueled. Why the denial?
Or it was me telling him that I have an indirect familiarity with him because I followed a game where he killed my wife on night one.

There's no grudge. He didn't even win that game. Your point sucks. Your attempt to push it sucks even more so.
At this point it's more about your backpedaling.

Oh ho ho ho! Nice. After having your point completely dissected by me, you say it's about my "backpedaling."

Lets try a new tact on this. Lets assume for the moment that I'm even holding a grudge on Danny from another game. How does that make me

more likely to be scum?

Wall-E · Post Post #41 (ISO) » Tue Mar 17, 2009 7:19 am

Zachrulez wrote:
Wall-E wrote:
Zachrulez wrote:
Wall-E wrote:
Zachrulez wrote:No, it's actually because I am married to one of the people you killed in newbie 727.
Your vote demonstrably WAS grudge-fueled. Why the denial?
Or it was me telling him that I have an indirect familiarity with him because I followed a game where he killed my wife on night one.

There's no grudge. He didn't even win that game. Your point sucks. Your attempt to push it sucks even more so.
At this point it's more about your backpedaling.
Oh ho ho ho! Nice. After having your point completely dissected by me, you say it's about my "backpedaling."

Lets try a new tact on this. Lets assume for the moment that I'm even holding a grudge on Danny from another game. How does that make me
more likely to be scum?

Where have I called you scum?

Zachrulez · Post Post #42 (ISO) » Tue Mar 17, 2009 7:25 am

Wall-E wrote:
Where have I called you scum?

Wall-E wrote:I'm going to
Vote: Zachrules
. This is a serious vote. He tried to give a serious random vote, and it felt forced.

Right there.

I mean, that's what our votes are for.

Who's backpedaling now?

Wall-E · Post Post #43 (ISO) » Tue Mar 17, 2009 7:43 am

I called it anti-town, not scummy.

Zachrulez · Post Post #44 (ISO) » Tue Mar 17, 2009 7:48 am

Post 19: Wall-E votes for me stating that I tried to give a serious random vote. Fail. Vote was not serious. I'm not even going to address the point that it felt forced. (Define RVS...)

Post 20: Restates that I am carrying a grudge from a previous game. Fail. Point's not serious, we're in RVS.

Post 22: I was trying to convey that the vote wasn't serious, but it's apparently not sinking in.

Post 33: I saw your reason for your vote, I didn't take it seriously because I didn't take my vote seriously... but you're intent to push on this as hard as you can so...

Post 35: Says my post was grudge-fueled. This is what I call ringing a bell really loudly so that no matter how reasonable of an explanation there is for the simple fact that this is not true, the lie will remain heard through the town and instill doubt about me.

Post 39: After addressing his points and completely destroying them, he now accusing me of backpedaling.

Post 40: I point out the inherent flaw of his original point, even if it's true. (It would be an indication of bad play, not scumminess, making the vote opportunistic.)

Post 41: This is what backpedaling is Wall-E, done by you. Leading to post 42, and ultimately to this.

Unvote, Vote: Wall-E

Votes using a quickly refuted point that he continually tries to advance as truth, and then backpedals from calling me scum after being asked why the point he made, even if true would make me more likely to be scum.

He can't justify his vote, he can't justify his pressure, so he backpedals from it, which now makes his vote not serious by default, despite the fact that he said it was serious.

I consider all of the above behavior on Wall-E's part scummy.

FOS: Pitstop

I want to see some game related content from you. My vote on you was designed to pressure you into posting some.

Zachrulez · Post Post #45 (ISO) » Tue Mar 17, 2009 7:48 am

Wall-E wrote:I called it anti-town, not scummy.

It doesn't matter what you called it, it was an unjustified point.

Stephoscope · Post Post #46 (ISO) » Tue Mar 17, 2009 8:14 am

lordzoner: you were one of the first to post in this thread when it opened, yet we've heard nothing from you since. Can you tell us a bit about your usual schedule, and how often you think you'll post?

(I am not necessarily asking this in an accusatory manner, just trying to introduce more things to talk about. I'm not going to say anything about the Wall-E / Zach exchange just yet.)

Gateway · Post Post #47 (ISO) » Tue Mar 17, 2009 8:37 am

Wall-E wrote:I'm going to
Vote: Zachrules
. This is a serious vote. He tried to give a serious random vote, and it felt forced.

Riiight... So ummm...

Unvote: Amished

Vote: Wall-E

alexhans · Post Post #48 (ISO) » Tue Mar 17, 2009 8:42 am

Wall-E wrote:I called it anti-town, not scummy.

May I laugh? So anti-town is not scummy... what are you calling him... Assasin?

I though that in mafia you were either town (therefore pro-town) or scum (therefore anti-town). And this isn't a mod game where there are cultists or other stuff like that...

X · Post Post #49 (ISO) » Tue Mar 17, 2009 8:54 am

Vote Count

Wall-E

: (4) alexhans, Gateway, ryan2754, Zachrulez

lordzoner

: (2) Amished, Conspicuous_other

alexhans

: (1) AshKetchummm

Amished

: (1) Debonair Danny DiPietro

Conspicuous_other

: (1) Stephoscope

Debonair Danny DiPietro

: (1) lordzoner

Zachrulez

: (1) Wall-E

Not Voting

: (1) Pitstop

Vote Threshold

: 7

Happiness with Posting Level

:

Satisified