>>>>>>>>>>
Skander wrote:miller has no need to talk to the mod and get annoyed at him.
Skander wrote:miller has no need to talk to the mod and get annoyed at him.
Well we're not talking about affairs of the heart, here, just the game, haha.Korts wrote:Blasphemy! How can you of all people say that?DrippingGoofball wrote:It doesn't matter what rofl said
It would be fun if we could punish a player that everyone finds annoying, but I can't replace, I'm already in the game.roflcopter wrote:waiting for a replacement would be cruel to the replacement. somebody hammer.
Um...didn't Elvis just flip town?DGB wrote: The case against vollkan was rubbish, with such a quick wagon I'm thinking 'mega-bus' and I was thinking that elvis was in the driver's seat.
He abandoned it when I explained the basis of my behaviour was early-game pot-stirring. Frankly, I think it's a null reaction.Korts wrote: Kort's spinned a 180 on the wagon so fast his tires caught fire. This needs to be elucidated.
Except, when I read Korts' early posts, it doesn't look like he is pushing a serious case.CarnCarn wrote:IIRC, Korts was the first person to push the case, and it was right out of the opening posts on D1. That makes vollkan and Korts more likely to be mutually exclusive as scum, to me, because that's not something I would expect scum to do. However, either one could still be scum.DrippingGoofball wrote:The case against vollkan was rubbish, with such a quick wagon I'm thinking 'mega-bus' and I was thinking that elvis was in the driver's seat.
Good catch.Skander wrote: miller has no need to talk to the mod and get annoyed at him.
He says he's seen way more fake claims than real but then says that we should ignore ABR claiming miller and get back to Volkan.charter wrote:I will throw my two cents in here. Seen way more fake miller claims than real ones.
I don't even know what this discussion is for. No one is arguing that ABR is scum because he claimed miller. You guys are letting vollkan off the hook. FOS those arguing this.
Scumbuddy post? I'd say if ABR flips scum, then Charter is a probable scumbuddy.Albert B. Rampage wrote:Very good point charter. I will have to come back on this later.charter wrote:No one is arguing that ABR is scum because he claimed miller. You guys are letting vollkan off the hook. FOS those arguing this.
korts could possibly be a third scum but I'm not sure.Korts wrote:No, DGB, I never said that a miller claim=confirmed town. To me it makes no immediate difference regarding alignment. I don't "trust millers with my money" but neither do I trust anyone else in this game with it.
So get on with actually relevant scumhunting instead of going off on tangential policy lynches.
OMGISvollkan wrote:Um...didn't Elvis just flip town?DGB wrote: The case against vollkan was rubbish, with such a quick wagon I'm thinking 'mega-bus' and I was thinking that elvis was in the driver's seat.
Your explanation wasn'tvollkan wrote:He abandoned it when I explained the basis of my behaviour was early-game pot-stirring. Frankly, I think it's a null reaction.I wrote: Kort's spinned a 180 on the wagon so fast his tires caught fire. This needs to be elucidated.
You need to fix'em tags.vollkan wrote:Unvote, Vote: ABR"]
Good question. This is twice now farside and DGB have overrun the thread with pointlessness.roflcopter wrote:why is there a discussion going on about what would happen were someone to claim miller at lynch -1?
Can you explain this in detail? It's all so intriguing.Korts wrote:I don't like the charter fake hammer, and the vollkan "messed up tags" hammer. Both seem like "ooh I wannawanna hammer tehscum" without the vote turning up in a vote count.
Ah, nice OMGUS. Do you have any reason to assume that any voteless role is in play? I don't; a quick scan of the vote counts shows to me that everyone's votes have showed up.charter wrote:Korts, I saw that he was hammered, but have you ever heard of voteless people or something like that? I even said "just in case".
I think DGB might be on to something about you.
What's there to explain? It's pretty much already in the original quote. charter's post-hammer vote is just that, a clear-cut attempt at pushing the wagon to overkill; and vollkan's vote I don't like because, unless his keyboard layout is radically different than the one I have come to know over the years, I don't see any likely scenario in which he tries to close a bold tag with a quotation mark.DrippingGoofball wrote:Can you explain this in detail? It's all so intriguing.Korts wrote:I don't like the charter fake hammer, and the vollkan "messed up tags" hammer. Both seem like "ooh I wannawanna hammer tehscum" without the vote turning up in a vote count.
Hmm. I don't really understand. Since it was stated in the first vote count that it was 7 to lynch, someone seems to be a double-voter.charter wrote:Korts, why just me and vollkan? Why not CarnCarn in your scum triangle? He voted ABR but wasnt in the votecount.
It wasn't meant to be a ? it was meant to be a ! I was busy during the weekend and did a quick post before taking off. Sorry about that.Korts wrote:unvote, vote: ABR
Why the ORLY? If you are asking for rofl's reasons, why follow his vote?farside22 wrote:ORLY?roflcopter wrote:ok guys, abr is lying about his roleclaim, time for a lynch
unvote:
vote: ABR