Past Ages Mafia - Game Over

killa seven · Post Post #625 (ISO) » Thu Mar 05, 2009 2:39 pm

i voted for pop last night. btw who is bsg

UnofficialRulerOfEveryone · Post Post #626 (ISO) » Thu Mar 05, 2009 2:40 pm

killa seven wrote:i voted for pop last night. btw who is bsg

This may be just as good a reason to have k7 replaced as inactivity...

killa seven · Post Post #627 (ISO) » Thu Mar 05, 2009 2:40 pm

what you mean? the day just started, yesterday went by so fast i missed it

killa seven · Post Post #628 (ISO) » Thu Mar 05, 2009 2:41 pm

oh, the bsg comment, yea i just checked the playerlist, ive never been in a game with him before and i thought the mod was abreviatiting.

UnofficialRulerOfEveryone · Post Post #629 (ISO) » Thu Mar 05, 2009 2:47 pm

Have you even read D1? BSG said enough that it should be obvious that she is in the game, and should be obvious who she is...

That's why.

Also, anyone notice that I was right about Santos being stupid town (Although I still wanted to lynch him, he wasn't ever going to help us...)? I might try that as a scum gambit, saying scum wouldn't play as openly stupid as that, which is why I would rather replace k7 than lynch him.

Budja · Post Post #630 (ISO) » Thu Mar 05, 2009 2:59 pm

URoE wrote:Also, anyone notice that I was right about Santos being stupid town (Although I still wanted to lynch him, he wasn't ever going to help us...)?

Yes, but if you were scum, you would know that already

.

Anyway, I would like to actually to see if we hear more from K7 before we ask for a replacement.

Also, on the quick-lynch-ie-ness, it was silent mafia and Santos was generally believed scummy so it wasn't too surprising to me. I was happy just to lynch Santos so we could discuss again later. I fail to see the advantage we had by extending the day.

Santos · Post Post #631 (ISO) » Thu Mar 05, 2009 3:58 pm

UR, you're retarded.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #632 (ISO) » Thu Mar 05, 2009 4:59 pm

The whole point in not quicklynching is to get discussion. We weren't going to get that yesterday, so quicklynching was fine. Also, convincing people with a case wasn't going to happen. I personally voted Santos as a policy lynch. Everyone was pretty much ok with lynching him. We couldn't get a real read on him. And if he was town, he wasn't helping. I was fine with lynching him and lynching him quickly.

Raider, I disagree about BSG doing what she wants. The power should be with the majority of the group. Of course she has the power to say otherwise, but I'd prefer playing this like a normal day. We don't know what kind of rules we'll have in future days, so when we have the chance to play a normal day, we should do it.

raider8169 · Post Post #633 (ISO) » Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:22 pm

Kmd4390 wrote:Raider, I disagree about BSG doing what she wants. The power should be with the majority of the group. Of course she has the power to say otherwise, but I'd prefer playing this like a normal day. We don't know what kind of rules we'll have in future days, so when we have the chance to play a normal day, we should do it.

I agree, but my point is that unless BSG agrees as well it really means nothing. BSG can end the day at anytime and for whatever reason, as I didnt vote for BSG and she has not even posted yet today we really dont know how this is going to work out.

Lawrencelot · Post Post #634 (ISO) » Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:39 pm

I voted KMD, mostly by process of elimination. Voting BSG did not really occur to me I think, but I'm fine with it (depending on what she will say as she did not post yet).

Killa seven will just play with minimal effort and the least amount of reading as usual. Unless he's gonna say he'll do otherwise, I'd like to see him replaced as well.

Now the more important discussion: who are we going to lynch?

Empking · Post Post #635 (ISO) » Fri Mar 06, 2009 5:47 am

Am I right in thinking that its
3 - UrOE
2 - BSG ?

I voted Ort BTW.

Narsis · Post Post #636 (ISO) » Fri Mar 06, 2009 6:46 am

Kmd4390 wrote:The whole point in not quicklynching is to get discussion. We weren't going to get that yesterday, so quicklynching was fine. Also, convincing people with a case wasn't going to happen. I personally voted Santos as a policy lynch. Everyone was pretty much ok with lynching him. We couldn't get a real read on him. And if he was town, he wasn't helping. I was fine with lynching him and lynching him quickly.

took the words right outta my mouth.

UnofficialRulerOfEveryone · Post Post #637 (ISO) » Fri Mar 06, 2009 12:44 pm

Best. Bah. Post. Ever. (@Santos)

Simply put, I think anyone trying to quicklynch in Silent Mafia is stupid... Have you ever recognized that those games are played with normal amounts of stupidity, not just quicklynch fest like AITP? It's a difference in playstyle that I guess I'll have to live with.

Still waiting on BSG

Empking · Post Post #638 (ISO) » Fri Mar 06, 2009 10:05 pm

In Slent Mafia, you never get to talk.

populartajo · Post Post #639 (ISO) » Sat Mar 07, 2009 4:53 am

IKWDT

raider8169 · Post Post #640 (ISO) » Sat Mar 07, 2009 5:09 am

populartajo wrote: IKWDT

What? I dont know what that means.

UnofficialRulerOfEveryone · Post Post #641 (ISO) » Sat Mar 07, 2009 6:44 am

Empking wrote:In Slent Mafia, you never get to talk.

Really now?

The problem is, I would've rather had everyone checked in, even if we DID vote Santos to be lynched, then do what we did.

Empking · Post Post #642 (ISO) » Sat Mar 07, 2009 6:49 am

UnofficialRulerOfEveryone wrote:
Empking wrote:In Slent Mafia, you never get to talk.
Really now?

The problem is, I would've rather had everyone checked in, even if we DID vote Santos to be lynched, then do what we did.

Can you?

raider8169 · Post Post #643 (ISO) » Sat Mar 07, 2009 8:58 am

UnofficialRulerOfEveryone wrote:
Empking wrote:In Slent Mafia, you never get to talk.
Really now?

The problem is, I would've rather had everyone checked in, even if we DID vote Santos to be lynched, then do what we did.

That day went by fast, I checked in first thing tossed a vote on Santos and then when I came back to check he was already lynched. I was not sure how the day would work out but that did seem too fast.

Budja · Post Post #644 (ISO) » Sat Mar 07, 2009 11:39 am

If we had been playing Silent Mafia from the start, then it would have been bad. As we did have discussion the day before and would have discussion the next day. I see nothing wrong with a quick-lynch. Their was essentially no point in extending the day there.

Now I don't think there is any point to discussing this anymore.

Narsis · Post Post #645 (ISO) » Sat Mar 07, 2009 1:17 pm

where oh where has BSG gone...oh where oh where can he be?

Brandi · Post Post #646 (ISO) » Sat Mar 07, 2009 1:36 pm

BSG is a girl... X_X

Empking · Post Post #647 (ISO) » Sat Mar 07, 2009 10:05 pm

Budja wrote:If we had been playing Silent Mafia from the start, then it would have been bad. As we did have discussion the day before and would have discussion the next day. I see nothing wrong with a quick-lynch. Their was essentially no point in extending the day there.

Now I don't think there is any point to discussing this anymore.

QFT

Brandi · Post Post #648 (ISO) » Sat Mar 07, 2009 10:52 pm

I agree with Emp and Budja. >_> I think the whole point of D2 was just to get a quick lynch. I would have voted for Santos too. The lynch of that day was pretty obviousssss

ortolan · Post Post #649 (ISO) » Sat Mar 07, 2009 11:18 pm

I voted for Kmd because I saw nothing to contradict my usual town-read of him.

Plus I knew he would just defer to voting for the lynch anyhow, which I'd prefer.

Kmd (623) wrote:Raider, I disagree about BSG doing what she wants. The power should be with the majority of the group. Of course she has the power to say otherwise, but I'd prefer playing this like a normal day. We don't know what kind of rules we'll have in future days, so when we have the chance to play a normal day, we should do it.

Strongly agreed.

Who else voted for BSG other than Kmd and Narsis, btw?