AshKetchummm (3): Dennis1993, Raivann, alexhans
alexhans (1): Boltrig
Kmd4390 (1): ZazieR
ZazieR (1): Kmd4390
Raivann (1): AshKetchummm
Not Voting: CntRational, syndromeofadown
5 to lynch.
So right now, I'll be happy with aZazie wrote:And I'd also like to know what according to you the difference is between your posts so far and those of Mizz.
Actually I'm gonna get off this wagonash wrote: I still think raviann isn't out of the water yet, until he comes up with a valid reason why he has been on the mizz/me bandwagon, and felt certain, but when confronted he says that it may be weak assumption.
Something better then.
"weak scumhunting"
Ash's reasons in #137 are weak sauceblueshadow wrote: My reason is exactly the same as Ash's in #137
Maybe I was just trying to make you talking, who knows.Raivann wrote:Ash's reasons in #137 are weak sauce
Not a good reason.Raivann wrote:had problems logging on
blueshadow wrote: Are you trying to scare me?
Cntr is afraid of l-2, stating that he doesn't want mafia to "vote rush" a townie, then later agrees with kmd that "it wouldn't be a waste. If scum let us find them that easy, we'd win no problem.", contradicting his vote rush logic. I'll get back to this later, but first, the other piece of the puzzle. I want bring something else to your attention. Someone's been on cntr's case more than anyone else in the entire game.CntRational wrote: Just in case you wondered why I would not vote for him if he had 2 votes is that: Assuming that the first 2 voters aren't mafia and I place my vote on him, would leave him with Lynch-2, at which the scum could come and voterush him, leading to a waste of a day 1 lynch.
ZazieR wrote:And I'd like to know from CntR, why he only mentioned Dennis, while Mizz also hadn't posted after she had voted.
ZazieR wrote:I'd like to know what you (Mizz) think of CntR and Alex not voting in their first post of the day.
ZazieR wrote:One player who did catch my attention is CntR. You might remember that he called Dennis out as he didn't post after his vote. Afterwards, he also saw that Mizz hadn't posted after her vote. But when she does post, he only states that he would vote her after waiting on a post (after those 3) as she pinged his scumdar. But he never stated why, and he didn't respond to her last post before she asked to be replaced. There's one other player that caught my interest with his response, but will get into him later.
ZazieR wrote:However, CntR, who votes Mizz for lurking, but didn't mention Bolt at all, while he was worse, deserves some attention as well.
Then comes,ZazieR wrote:But CntR, how come you were saying that you'd vote Mizz (which was based upon lurking), but not Boltrig or Dennis? And I'd also like to know what according to you the difference is between your posts so far and those of Mizz.
This is what really pinged my scumdar. Remember when he didn't vote me in fear of l-2 and scum-rushing? Now he goes and puts someone at l-1 for no reason at all! And what makes this extra scummy is this:CntRational wrote:I want to get this going somewhere, so...
Vote:AshKetchummm
Does that look like a cautious townie move to any of you guys? Which brings up the question: Why would cntr do this if it was already established that he acts cautious as town? Would any (cnt) rational person really think that putting someone at l-1 just to "get the game going" would help himself or the town at all?Kmd4390 wrote:I see that you[cntrational] were cautious as town in Newbie 709, so I won't hold it against you.
Blueshadow wrote: Now I vote CntR since he wanted to get this going that badly. Someone's just got to go first.
Based on your posts, it seems like neither of you two are all that sure that CntRational is scum. Explain to me how a "Oh hell, lets just lynch someone already!" is very pro-town???I think this is the hammer vote, and you are most likely going to condemn me for it, but I think it's in the best interest of the town to get rid of someone who acts scummy, and places votes without any real reason sooo....
Unvote: Vote CntRational
What can I say? A good job maybe ....Raivann wrote:I believe blue would have hammered CntR if he could have, before CntR could even post. I don't like his reasoning for lynch either saying "someone's gotta go first" and I believe that blue is deserving of my vote
Welcome, yellowbunny.yellowbunny wrote:Based on your posts, it seems like neither of you two are all that sure that CntRational is scum. Explain to me how a "Oh hell, lets just lynch someone already!" is very pro-town???