Okay, call ityawetag wrote:I don't see how three people voting the same person is "random."
jokevoting
, if that makes more sense.It amounts to the same thing in practical terms - the description "random" applies to the lack of actual case for the votes and does not imply that all random stage votes will be truely random.
What? Empking's reason was "yawetag wrote:Especially when 1) NONE of them even hinted it was, and 2) This was done within a few posts.
I dont like Bs
" (which he later clarified to mean he doesn't like the letter 'B'), and Jebus' response to your comment on the two-man bandwagon was "Because vote: Braeden". The former is blatantly not serious and the latter infers a lack of seriousness in presenting the vote itself as the reason for the vote.Then, of course, we know charter's vote was not made with ill intent.
Okay, you're right - I take that back.yawetag wrote:No. I answered it when my question was answered.Spolium in 223 wrote:You were asked a simple yes/no question, sidestepped it a few times and didn't actually get around to answering it until someone voted you.
However, I still don't like how you refused to answer the question until yours was answered, since this suggests that your answer could have been dependent upon the answer given by one of the bandwagoners.
Even if this was the case, as the bandwagon approached L-1 any townies would have unvoted because their non-serious bandwagon was unjustifiable.yawetag wrote:Let's say there's 3 of them. We vote a couple votes on someone, one of the scum attaches on. We vote another vote, another scum attaches. Then a townie hammers. I hardly see how you can sniff out the scum in that setup.Spolium in 223 wrote:Except not, because then we'd have some pretty damned obvious scum (although the most likely scenario would be that at least 2-3 voters unvoting before anything could happen).
Yeah, like a townie would quickhammer on a 100% unsupported case.
It's entirely unfeasible to say that (a) townies would keep their votes, or (b) scum would risk drawing attention by pushing it as far as L-1 (bear in mind that both (a) and (b) would need to occur for scum to get it to L-1).
), so looking for a replacement from him.
