DDD wrote:Well sure, apparently me
playing with my content filter off
looks to the rest of you like scum making 86,000 mistakes instead of a simply different play style. Furthermore, if freeko is any example the status quo is to ignore and evade any arguments made against you instead of taking them head on like I prefer to do which does in fact only seem to get me into more trouble as this post surely will, won't stop me from making them though.
- Yadda yadda yadda Meta defense yadda. -
It's nonsensical.
Your last line here does good job of summarizing how I feel about the second two paragraphs, which I've also summarized. What is the bolded line supposed to mean? Your playstyle is not "different." Your playstyle is "post a lot and at length," which is nothing new under the sun. I've been suspicious of you for a suspicious vote cast for suspicious reasons, and you've been suspicious of another player for a questionable reason and he's answered with all the gravity deserved by your attack.
Nuwen wrote:I'm glad Mizz.Mafia was replaced. Clueless estrogen on the Internet makes me want to tear my well-conditioned hair out. I don't think her play reflected on her role, as she was obviously flailing about, but I wouldn't immediately discount it.
I'm glad she is going to be replaced because she was genuinely in over her head and now we might have a valid contribution from all 12 of the players in the game. The standard prescription for players replacing serious non-contributing lurkers is generally "Post," which it should be easy to pick up on if her replacement doesn't do much of it.
Fishythefish wrote:(4th vote! Forget DDD, that makes me scum! LYNCH TIME!!!!!)
What are you doing? Did DDD ever even say that? Pointing out your behavior as "suspicious" in an attempt to head off suspicion indicates a clear lack of confidence in what you're doing and/or substandard reasons for doing it, which the rest of your post doesn't brush up against at all.
DDD wrote:Of course, I'm most concerned about getting out of suspicion. I have
one
piece of confirmed information. I win with the town. If I focus on getting someone else lynched there's a 20-35% "random" chance we lynch correctly and a 65-80% random chance we lynch a fellow pro-town player and that's assuming I somehow move the attention off me while spending more time examining other people. If I fail in moving suspicion off me and I'm lynched then there's a 100% chance a pro-town player has been lynched. It's simple math that I should dedicate the bulk of my time to not being lynched and yes, I have done some hunting in my defenses.
Ugh. I despise this kind of soft-claiming. If you're going to claim because a fourth player hopped onto your wagon, then go ahead and do it without all this maundering on. If you're going to count on everybody being able to empathize with the plight of a player who has no seeming way to get out from under the unfair suspicion created by everybody else being idiots, then best of luck to you. If you're banking on people misunderstanding your little opening line to mean that you have one
additional
piece of information, well then that's decently clever but I'm not falling for it.
Oh and this, from earlier in the same post:
DDD wrote:Apologies to Pacman for the terrible, evil wall of text, but just maybe he could bother to read through it and actually do some scumhunting even if it's of me?
Is REALLY cute. The suspicion of pacman has nothing whatsoever to do with you. The whole "Contribute, even if it's to vote for me!" attitude is in clear contradiction of your point further down. We understand that you think pacman's wagon has more merit than yours, but we're not biting for a reason.
Light-kun wrote:(Again, I am too lazy too look up who you were voting, and this only applies if you were voting DDD.)
Would it have been so hard to open a new tab and check the most recent vote count? Instead you had to make a conditional inquiry/statement of suspicion?
freeko wrote:This is also false. You know your flavor name, you know your rolename, you know your role ability (if applicable), and you know your alignment. Of course all this would only be confirmed to everyone else upon your death (assuming that roles are flipped when the player dies)
What kind of point is this? Are you trying to apply LAL to a clear oversimplified softclaim? Really?