Mini 734 - GrimMafia - OVER

Zachrulez · Post Post #425 (ISO) » Mon Feb 23, 2009 10:57 am

Change the middle sentence to the last post a little bit.

Would you think it worth defending yourself and risk being seen as defensive?

Nuwen · Post Post #426 (ISO) » Mon Feb 23, 2009 11:08 am

zwetschenwasser wrote:He didn't make an attempt to defend himself.

This is not a scumtell.

This is not a scumtell.

Dear god, this is not a scumtell. And even if you believe it is, what does that say about your repeated neglect of questions/accusations tossed in your direction? Either your scum tells are wrong, or you just inadvertently claimed scum using your own set of axioms. Kudos.

Ectomancer · Post Post #427 (ISO) » Mon Feb 23, 2009 12:53 pm

House hunting, cleaning, painting etc during the coming weeks. Sporadic appearances are likely until I we find the one we like and move.

Beyond_Birthday · Post Post #428 (ISO) » Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:49 pm

I find Zwet's post attacking Spring is pointless. I am unsurprised to find a nonchalant Spring, and Nuwen and Zach are at least still sane.

Conclusion: No change in thoughts or play. Enjoy.

Pablo Molinero · Post Post #429 (ISO) » Mon Feb 23, 2009 4:50 pm

Yeah, I'm wary to end a day so quickly, but zwet's bizarre behavior/confidence is awfully off-putting. His story seems too far of a long shot and reeks of scum creating a conspiracy. The vote stands.

Grimmy · Post Post #430 (ISO) » Tue Feb 24, 2009 3:15 am

Current vote count

Zwet...(4 of 6)

Nuwen
beyond B.
Pablo m.
Ecto...

Beyond Birthday

Madam.f.h.

Springlullaby

Zwet...

Im imposing a deadline of...

illl get back to you on the exact date, but you kids have about two weeks from yesterday

Grimmy

edit in post

March 9th, around noontime in NYC.

Nuwen · Post Post #431 (ISO) » Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:01 pm

Did those prods go out to Wolfblitzer and Sipylus, Grimmy?

I'd hate to have to policy lynch lurkers on day 2 over an overtly scummy player.

Grimmy · Post Post #432 (ISO) » Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:08 pm

Nuwen wrote:
Did those prods go out to Wolfblitzer and Sipylus, Grimmy?

I'd hate to have to policy lynch lurkers on day 2 over an overtly scummy player.

yes. gentle prods have been sent.

Nuwen · Post Post #433 (ISO) » Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:11 pm

Thanks. Happy Fat Tuesday~

Beyond_Birthday · Post Post #434 (ISO) » Tue Feb 24, 2009 2:32 pm

Bon Mardi gras Ã tout le monde!

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #435 (ISO) » Wed Feb 25, 2009 7:04 am

Zachrulez wrote:Which means what exactly?

I mean does it warrant a response or a defense? What would you say to an accusation that you are scum based solely on the fact that someone died?

Would you think it worth defending yourself to be seen as defensive?

Or would you think that such an attack doesn't even warrant a response?

By the way. Spring's gender icon is female, a lot of people have been using the wrong pronoun when speaking of her.

1. It warrants at least a thought out response. I would at least say "No, idiot, you're a fool." Spring didn't even do that!
2. Yes
3. No
4. Oops.

springlullaby · Post Post #436 (ISO) » Thu Feb 26, 2009 2:57 am

I don't think you are a fool, I think you are more likely to be really bad scum at this point. Because you'd have to be a really big fool if you came up with that little narrative while being town.

I'm also content to see other people's reaction to you actually.

Ectomancer · Post Post #437 (ISO) » Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:05 am

I've seen no argument as of yet to change my mind.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #438 (ISO) » Thu Feb 26, 2009 1:24 pm

This has nothing to do with you not thinking that I'm a fool. If you thought I was really bad scum, why didn't you say so in you first response?

Beyond_Birthday · Post Post #439 (ISO) » Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:28 pm

I see no defense, zwet.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #440 (ISO) » Thu Feb 26, 2009 5:45 pm

Defense against...

Pablo Molinero · Post Post #441 (ISO) » Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:34 pm

Let's start at the beginning: your elaborate declaration that Spring is scum due to the NK. Why did you just drop it all at once instead of discussing and building a stronger case? It seems all you have is overeager conjecture. The best defense is a good offense, so go on the offensive and give us something other than, "LOOK LOOK SCUM!" Quotes? Elaboration?

(I dunno what the rest of you want from him, but it's a start.)

Zachrulez · Post Post #442 (ISO) » Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:43 pm

Pablo Molinero wrote:Let's start at the beginning: your elaborate declaration that Spring is scum due to the NK. Why did you just drop it all at once instead of discussing and building a stronger case? It seems all you have is overeager conjecture. The best defense is a good offense, so go on the offensive and give us something other than, "LOOK LOOK SCUM!" Quotes? Elaboration?

(I dunno what the rest of you want from him, but it's a start.)

I wouldn't mind seeing any or all of that.

In the meantime, I am going to have another look at Zwet's day one play.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #443 (ISO) » Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:54 pm

I suppose you might call it an overeager conjecture, but do you admit that it's possible? The very fact that scum wouldn't have killed JereIC might have made Spring kill him out of necessity, as I outlined in my case. The thing is, now that I have a case on Spring, Spring is completely disregarding it, and the first thing Spring said when I was discussing the possibilities was a completely flippant, pointless remark, which solidifies my theory, at least in my eyes.

Nuwen · Post Post #444 (ISO) » Thu Feb 26, 2009 9:03 pm

zwetschenwasser wrote:Case.

That's everyone's point. What case?

zwetschenwasser wrote:The very fact that scum wouldn't have killed JereIC might have made Spring kill him out of necessity,

Except scum DID kill Jere. You're trying to assert that killing Jere was an unlikely move for Spring, therefore it's also the most likely move for Spring. The heart of your "case" is pure WIFOM.

Confirm vote: zwetschenwasser

springlullaby · Post Post #445 (ISO) » Fri Feb 27, 2009 11:14 am

zwetschenwasser wrote:I suppose you might call it an overeager conjecture, but do you admit that it's possible? The very fact that scum wouldn't have killed JereIC might have made Spring kill him out of necessity, as I outlined in my case. The thing is, now that I have a case on Spring, Spring is completely disregarding it, and the first thing Spring said when I was discussing the possibilities was a completely flippant, pointless remark, which solidifies my theory, at least in my eyes.

I'm curious, what wouldn't solidify your theory "at least in your eyes"?

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #446 (ISO) » Sat Feb 28, 2009 10:17 am

If you had said something intelligent and useful to refute my statements.

Beyond_Birthday · Post Post #447 (ISO) » Sat Feb 28, 2009 6:07 pm

Hm... I still have no change of position. Just checking in. (Also, how can Spring have a real defense to a joke case based on wifom and conjecture?)

Ectomancer · Post Post #448 (ISO) » Sat Feb 28, 2009 6:26 pm

He just said he had a case, not that it was a good one.

springlullaby · Post Post #449 (ISO) » Sun Mar 01, 2009 3:04 am

zwetschenwasser wrote:If you had said something intelligent and useful to refute my statements.

Your answer may sounds relevant here, but it is in fact generic nothingness. Tell me can you say what you think an "intelligent and useful" statement would have been and why?

Then I'll tell you my silence was both intelligent and useful.

@Ectomancer, I'd like to know precisely what you mean in your last post.