killa seven wrote:Im town nothin special, go ahead and hammer big boy.
Interesting. I don't see any way your claim and/or antagonism will help whatever team you are on.
With a literal invitation to hammer, I think we should reconsider the possibility that he is a jester. It could be reverse psychology, but why phrase it to offend?
killa seven wrote:i wont respond to your threats.
can you tell that i dont care by now?
What is it that you don't care about? The statement of the threat? His vote? His reasons for voting? Whether you are lynched? Whether the side you are on wins the game? All of the above?
Jazzmyn wrote:what do you think his answer will be to a request to "commit to future participation"? Do you expect scum to say no, they will not commit to future participation? Do you expect town to say no, they will not commit to future participation?
A rational town-sided person should answer this question honestly, though I'll grant he does not appear to be acting like a rational town-sided person. There is a mathematical reasoning behind this, but I'm not sure if it's best to share it. But anyways, if he does make that commitment, and it is later proven to be a lie, he will probably be lynched for the lying+lurking combination. Maybe that's why he hasn't answered yet?
@EA and dejka: Could you each tell us why you are voting for Killer Seven? We could all assume that we know, but it would be good to hear it in your own words. And it would give you an opportunity to make a case against him.
@Plonky: I'm sorry that your huge post got eaten, but could you at least make a little post?