[OLD] Open Setup Ideas and Discussion

This forum is for discussion of individual Open Setups, including theoretical balance.
User avatar
Thok
Thok
Disgrace to SKs everywhere
User avatar
User avatar
Thok
Disgrace to SKs everywhere
Disgrace to SKs everywhere
Posts: 7013
Joined: March 28, 2005

Post Post #250 (ISO) » Wed Feb 18, 2009 11:22 am

Post by Thok »

Nominate Dethy


Second hohum's choices.
I replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.
User avatar
ac1983fan
ac1983fan
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
ac1983fan
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1664
Joined: January 5, 2007

Post Post #251 (ISO) » Wed Feb 18, 2009 11:31 am

Post by ac1983fan »

Clever name goes here

2 Scum
1 Recruiting mason
6 Townies

Scum & masons each get a quicktopic, recruiting mason dies if he targets scum, recruiting is not compulsory.
I was considering putting a watcher/night watchman in there, but wasn't sure if it was necessary... thoughts?
Not a dayvig.
User avatar
The Fonz
The Fonz
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
The Fonz
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9014
Joined: April 2, 2007
Location: UK

Post Post #252 (ISO) » Wed Feb 18, 2009 11:33 am

Post by The Fonz »

shaft.ed wrote:
Nominate JK9


I think Eye C9 is too harsh on scum
Eye C9 has two roles that have basically half the chance of a cop of catching scum, and can't confirm innocents, though they have the advantage over a cop of not both being able to die in one night. So I can't see how it's harder for scum, than, say, California.
User avatar
shaft.ed
shaft.ed
dem.agogue
User avatar
User avatar
shaft.ed
dem.agogue
dem.agogue
Posts: 4998
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis

Post Post #253 (ISO) » Wed Feb 18, 2009 12:09 pm

Post by shaft.ed »

The Fonz wrote:
shaft.ed wrote:
Nominate JK9


I think Eye C9 is too harsh on scum
Eye C9 has two roles that have basically half the chance of a cop of catching scum, and can't confirm innocents, though they have the advantage over a cop of not both being able to die in one night. So I can't see how it's harder for scum, than, say, California.
You have two roles than have the ability to catch the killing scum. There really isn't any out for scum if they are watched or tracked to a dead body so like you said they are like a non-innocent cop. But only having two scum means that they are at the begining of the game able to conclude people are 50% less likely to be scum and after a single scum is lynched, they can in fact confirm innocents. So if they manage to survive past the first scum lynch, I really don't see any viable way for the scum to win. I think watchers and trackers in small games are more powerful than people realize, especially when the set up confirms that there aren't any extra night actions about for scum to hide behind.
Seraphim
Seraphim
she/her
Jack of All Trades
Seraphim
she/her
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6165
Joined: September 20, 2008
Pronoun: she/her

Post Post #254 (ISO) » Wed Feb 18, 2009 2:51 pm

Post by Seraphim »

Punish The Deserving


3 Mafia
8 Town
1 SK Punisher

Mod Notes: This SK can kill any player at night who was prodded during the previous day due to inactivity. This must be true lurking as opposed to announced V/LA absences. The SK wins if everyone is dead or if no one is replaced during the game due to inactivity.

This could use some tweaking, definitely, but I think the basic concept could work. Maybe some other town roles in there...
User avatar
Alduskkel
Alduskkel
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Alduskkel
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7656
Joined: September 19, 2008

Post Post #255 (ISO) » Wed Feb 18, 2009 3:09 pm

Post by Alduskkel »

Remove the win condition of no one being replaced due to inactivity. That penalizes people for being active, which is the opposite of how I think you intended that role.
CLICK HERE FOR THE ALDUSKKEL APPRECIATION PAGE
"i've only known aldus for four and a half months but if anything happened to him i would kill everyone in this room and then myself" -Datisi, March 28 2020
Avatar made by Brandi.
Seraphim
Seraphim
she/her
Jack of All Trades
Seraphim
she/her
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6165
Joined: September 20, 2008
Pronoun: she/her

Post Post #256 (ISO) » Wed Feb 18, 2009 3:11 pm

Post by Seraphim »

So you think the SK should just have a normal SK win condition and that the game is balanced this way?
User avatar
Alduskkel
Alduskkel
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Alduskkel
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7656
Joined: September 19, 2008

Post Post #257 (ISO) » Wed Feb 18, 2009 3:16 pm

Post by Alduskkel »

I have no clue how to balance setups. I can spot blatantly unbalanced setups, but that's it. I was merely pointing out that the Punisher role simultaneously rewards activity and inactivity, as well as punishing both. I'm fine with punishing inactivity, but punishing activity seems ridiculous.
CLICK HERE FOR THE ALDUSKKEL APPRECIATION PAGE
"i've only known aldus for four and a half months but if anything happened to him i would kill everyone in this room and then myself" -Datisi, March 28 2020
Avatar made by Brandi.
User avatar
mykonian
mykonian
Frisian Shoulder-Demon
User avatar
User avatar
mykonian
Frisian Shoulder-Demon
Frisian Shoulder-Demon
Posts: 11963
Joined: August 27, 2008

Post Post #258 (ISO) » Wed Feb 18, 2009 8:50 pm

Post by mykonian »

The Fonz wrote:
shaft.ed wrote:
Nominate JK9


I think Eye C9 is too harsh on scum
Eye C9 has two roles that have basically half the chance of a cop of catching scum, and can't confirm innocents, though they have the advantage over a cop of not both being able to die in one night. So I can't see how it's harder for scum, than, say, California.
simply wait till tracker has found one scum: after that, he claims, that night, watcher watches tracker and the game is close to unwinnable for scum.
User avatar
SensFan
SensFan
Fortuna Ex Deus
User avatar
User avatar
SensFan
Fortuna Ex Deus
Fortuna Ex Deus
Posts: 7760
Joined: November 11, 2007
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Post Post #259 (ISO) » Thu Feb 19, 2009 2:49 am

Post by SensFan »

But then the Scum managed to have one of their own lynched VERY early (or they can counter the tracker/watcher), AND not manage to kill either Power Role. They shouldn't bitch about losing.
(11:04:10 PM) senspizzaline: That's actually my bold prediction for the year
(11:04:19 PM) senspizzaline: Miami finishes 2nd in the AFCE.
(11:05:35 PM) jhawk01b: my bold prediction for the year is that whoever wins the NFC West will have a winning record
User avatar
Thok
Thok
Disgrace to SKs everywhere
User avatar
User avatar
Thok
Disgrace to SKs everywhere
Disgrace to SKs everywhere
Posts: 7013
Joined: March 28, 2005

Post Post #260 (ISO) » Thu Feb 19, 2009 9:50 am

Post by Thok »

ac1983fan wrote:
Clever name goes here

2 Scum
1 Recruiting mason
6 Townies

Scum & masons each get a quicktopic, recruiting mason dies if he targets scum, recruiting is not compulsory.
I was considering putting a watcher/night watchman in there, but wasn't sure if it was necessary... thoughts?
I'd suggest making the masons not have the ability to night-talk. Otherwise the recruiting mason ends up being too much of a cop. Hypocop issues might be a problem also (have everybody claim their night targets each day.)
I replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.
User avatar
Adel
Adel
Crystalline Logick
User avatar
User avatar
Adel
Crystalline Logick
Crystalline Logick
Posts: 6743
Joined: May 23, 2007
Location: Central Oregon / High Desert

Post Post #261 (ISO) » Thu Feb 19, 2009 10:22 am

Post by Adel »

ac1983fan wrote:
Clever name goes here

2 Scum
1 Recruiting mason
6 Townies

Scum & masons each get a quicktopic, recruiting mason dies if he targets scum, recruiting is not compulsory.
I was considering putting a watcher/night watchman in there, but wasn't sure if it was necessary... thoughts?
hmmm...
day 1:
no lynch
or
random lynch
or
near-random wagon to claim
  • if
    nolynch
    then
    • random nk:
      1/6 chance of hitting recruiting mason
      1/6 chance of hitting player targeted by recruiting mason
      random recruit:
      1/4 chance of hitting scum
      1/6 chance of hitting nk target
      7/12 chance of hitting town who survives the night
      result:
      (1/6+1/4)= 5/12 chance of 2Maf+1Mas+6Twn (2:7 vanilla favors scum)
      1/6 chance of 2Maf+1RecM+6Twn (unclear)
      (7/12-1/6)= 5/12 chance of 2Maf+1RecM+1Mas+5Twn (clear advantage town)
    if
    random lynch
    then
    • 2/9 chance of lynching Maf (clear advantage town)
      1/9 chance of lynching RecM (2:6 vanilla after nk: clear advantage scum)
      2/3 chance of lynching Twn (slight advantage scum)
    if
    near-random wagon to claim
    then
    • 1/9 chance of RecM claim (clear advantage scum)
      2/9 chance of fake RecM claim (clear advantage scum if counterclaimed, if no counterclaim then even odds?)
      2/3 chance of Twn lynch (slight advantage scum)
if
no lynch
-> 2Maf+1RecM+6Twn -> hypo cop then town should win >1/2 of the time?
if if
no lynch
-> 2Maf+1RecM+6Twn -> hypo cop then town should win >3/4 of the time

I think it looks pretty balanced, assuming the town would correctly conclude that nolynch is the correct option for day 1, which is doubtful.
User avatar
farside22
farside22
Mafia Mum
User avatar
User avatar
farside22
Mafia Mum
Mafia Mum
Posts: 35785
Joined: October 24, 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY

Post Post #262 (ISO) » Thu Feb 19, 2009 11:43 am

Post by farside22 »

So far I haven't seen anything really jump up here that looks right.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
User avatar
JDodge
JDodge
Accept it
User avatar
User avatar
JDodge
Accept it
Accept it
Posts: 5926
Joined: May 6, 2005
Location: Atop my cloud

Post Post #263 (ISO) » Thu Feb 19, 2009 11:54 am

Post by JDodge »

Virtual Simplicity

Based on the setup "Picking Simplicity"

3 Mafia Goons
1 Mafia Roleblocker
1 Tracker
1 Jailkeeper
1 Serial Killer (NK Immune?)
13 Townies

<3 the complex role interaction the jailkeeper brings to the setup
stream

ffxiv/speedrunning sometimes/other things?
User avatar
shaft.ed
shaft.ed
dem.agogue
User avatar
User avatar
shaft.ed
dem.agogue
dem.agogue
Posts: 4998
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis

Post Post #264 (ISO) » Thu Feb 19, 2009 12:00 pm

Post by shaft.ed »

JDodge wrote:
Virtual Simplicity

Based on the setup "Picking Simplicity"

3 Mafia Goons
1 Mafia Roleblocker
1 Tracker
1 Jailkeeper
1 Serial Killer (NK Immune?)
13 Townies

<3 the complex role interaction the jailkeeper brings to the setup
Role resolution is JK>RB>Everyone else?
I'd suggest 1 or 2 shot NK immune SK.
User avatar
JDodge
JDodge
Accept it
User avatar
User avatar
JDodge
Accept it
Accept it
Posts: 5926
Joined: May 6, 2005
Location: Atop my cloud

Post Post #265 (ISO) » Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:02 pm

Post by JDodge »

shaft.ed wrote:
JDodge wrote:
Virtual Simplicity

Based on the setup "Picking Simplicity"

3 Mafia Goons
1 Mafia Roleblocker
1 Tracker
1 Jailkeeper
1 Serial Killer (NK Immune?)
13 Townies

<3 the complex role interaction the jailkeeper brings to the setup
Role resolution is JK>RB>Everyone else?
I'd suggest 1 or 2 shot NK immune SK.
nope, RB=JK>...
stream

ffxiv/speedrunning sometimes/other things?
User avatar
Thok
Thok
Disgrace to SKs everywhere
User avatar
User avatar
Thok
Disgrace to SKs everywhere
Disgrace to SKs everywhere
Posts: 7013
Joined: March 28, 2005

Post Post #266 (ISO) » Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:07 pm

Post by Thok »

If the roleblock and jailkeeper target each other, is the roleblocker protected from nightkills?

(Everything else is straightforward.)
I replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.
User avatar
shaft.ed
shaft.ed
dem.agogue
User avatar
User avatar
shaft.ed
dem.agogue
dem.agogue
Posts: 4998
Joined: August 15, 2007
Location: St. Louis

Post Post #267 (ISO) » Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:09 pm

Post by shaft.ed »

Thok wrote:If the roleblock and jailkeeper target each other, is the roleblocker protected from nightkills?

(Everything else is straightforward.)
This, They can't be equal.
User avatar
JDodge
JDodge
Accept it
User avatar
User avatar
JDodge
Accept it
Accept it
Posts: 5926
Joined: May 6, 2005
Location: Atop my cloud

Post Post #268 (ISO) » Thu Feb 19, 2009 5:21 pm

Post by JDodge »

Thok wrote:If the roleblock and jailkeeper target each other, is the roleblocker protected from nightkills?

(Everything else is straightforward.)
Nope, chalk it up to roleblocker's stupidity. Which I guess makes it RB>JK>others.
stream

ffxiv/speedrunning sometimes/other things?
User avatar
CF Riot
CF Riot
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
CF Riot
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2444
Joined: June 5, 2008
Location: Oklahoma

Post Post #269 (ISO) » Thu Feb 19, 2009 6:40 pm

Post by CF Riot »

Seraphim wrote:
Punish The Deserving
Make the SK a vig. SKs have it hard enough killing anyone they need to. If they're a gimp SK they have no chance. How balanced is 8T,1V,3M outside of the "punisher" situation?
User avatar
Mr. Flay
Mr. Flay
Metatron
User avatar
User avatar
Mr. Flay
Metatron
Metatron
Posts: 24969
Joined: March 12, 2004
Location: Gormenghast

Post Post #270 (ISO) » Thu Feb 19, 2009 6:45 pm

Post by Mr. Flay »

Second Bird C9

Meh Dethy
- it's a logic puzzle, not Mafia.
Retired as of October 2014.
User avatar
Adel
Adel
Crystalline Logick
User avatar
User avatar
Adel
Crystalline Logick
Crystalline Logick
Posts: 6743
Joined: May 23, 2007
Location: Central Oregon / High Desert

Post Post #271 (ISO) » Thu Feb 19, 2009 10:19 pm

Post by Adel »

Mr. Flay wrote:
Meh Dethy
- it's a logic puzzle, not Mafia.
I think we can agree that there should be a rule that says "games that do not start off with more than one scum player are not mafia" -- that is my objection to Dethy anyway. It needs more scumz.
User avatar
Xylthixlm
Xylthixlm
!xmafia win
User avatar
User avatar
Xylthixlm
!xmafia win
!xmafia win
Posts: 5414
Joined: July 12, 2006

Post Post #272 (ISO) » Thu Feb 19, 2009 10:25 pm

Post by Xylthixlm »

Adel wrote:
Mr. Flay wrote:
Meh Dethy
- it's a logic puzzle, not Mafia.
I think we can agree that there should be a rule that says "games that do not start off with more than one scum player are not mafia" -- that is my objection to Dethy anyway. It needs more scumz.
Nominate SS3
#mafia@irc.globalgamers.net

"Xyl was completely berserk" -dramonic
"Xyl's ruthless policy lynching won the game." -Vi
User avatar
Korts
Korts
Luddite
User avatar
User avatar
Korts
Luddite
Luddite
Posts: 5752
Joined: January 1, 2008
Location: HUN BUD

Post Post #273 (ISO) » Thu Feb 19, 2009 11:53 pm

Post by Korts »

There's Four Jacks in Every Deck


2 Mafia Goons
1 Mafia Jack-of-All-Trades (one shot each of kill, roleblock, alignment invert (can target self))
1 Neutral Jack-of-All-Trades (one shot each of kill, roleblock, alignment invert (can target self); unlimited NK-immunity) i.e. SK
2 Pro-Town Jacks-of-All-Trades (one shot each of protect, investigate, roleblock)
5 Vanilla Townies
scumchat never die
User avatar
Korts
Korts
Luddite
User avatar
User avatar
Korts
Luddite
Luddite
Posts: 5752
Joined: January 1, 2008
Location: HUN BUD

Post Post #274 (ISO) » Thu Feb 19, 2009 11:57 pm

Post by Korts »

mykonian wrote:
The Fonz wrote:
shaft.ed wrote:
Nominate JK9


I think Eye C9 is too harsh on scum
Eye C9 has two roles that have basically half the chance of a cop of catching scum, and can't confirm innocents, though they have the advantage over a cop of not both being able to die in one night. So I can't see how it's harder for scum, than, say, California.
simply wait till tracker has found one scum: after that, he claims, that night, watcher watches tracker and the game is close to unwinnable for scum.
Without a doctor, how do you wait until tracker finds scum without having the scum kill half the town in the meanwhile?

I like EyeC9.


second JK9, third Two of Four B9


EDIT: I didn't see shaft.ed's 253.
scumchat never die

Return to “Open Setup Discussion”