OK, I did a bit more reading, and here are a few more notes I have (Yes, I am skipping ahead as far as my notes go because I do have a few questions here I want to ask):
1) First off, I really don't like how zwet went and claimed his role right after Phate asked for a MC. If he really is a MUP as he claims, then odds are he is town. This is also bad as it now puts a big ass target on a not only sane inspect, but also a possible kill. I kinda wonder if maybe there is a Phate/Zwet connection here.
2) URoE has a damn good point about townies not wanting to MC, especially if they have any sort of power. There is no need to go outing any docs/town rbs/cops at this stage in the game. Yes, scum would be just as hesitant, but that is why this is a null tell.
3) DGB, in post 129 you say that as town you feel that you should go along with a MC despite objecting to it. How come?
4) Vir, you ask why Tar may want to be lynched if that is indeed where he is going with this. You do mention jester which is a possibility, but this could also be really, really bad Super-saint or Mad Gunman play. Heck, this my also be bad pinata pay. Fact is, there are qute a few roles that would like to see a lynch considering this is wacky.
5) Zwet in post 145: As much as your logic kinda makes sense, the literal pelothera of roles Xylbot can throw out, (Something like 500+ non-themed roles,) makes confirming/proving someone really hard. Not to say it can't be done, just that if town has a role, odds are scum has some sort of equivalent.
6) roflcopter: I feel you made a very weak vote in post 149 and an even weaker excuse in post 151. This is followed up by tajo making a vote on him in post 151. Now, I haven't played any games with you and this could indeed be town-you as DGB suggests.
7) Tajo: to answer your question in post 151: In theroy it is possible, but again wacky has just about every role possible available to it. The only real difference between wacky and insane, (Another setup on xylbot,) is how balanced the setup is.
8)164: Yaya's only post so far. Yaya, it has been over 2 days since you made that post, what do you think about what you have read? The thread was not that long at that point and I obviously got through it all pretty quickly.
9)168: TAR's 4th or 5th vote on someone (I personally lost count by this point.) The only difference here it seems is that he actually has a valid point here. This was acknowledged in post 173 by Tubby himself. So Tubby, if you didn't understand, why didn't you ask earlier as opposed to active lurking like you did?
Well that about covers everything. I think I feel somewhat comfortable with this:
!vote: Tubby
I just don't see the reason to active lurk like you have been.
@Kev: That's kinda what I was figuring. Just be careful, bread leaves quite a mess I hear.