Open 119 - Masons and Mafia (GAME OVER) before 747

[rokovoj]

Quote exactly where I implied that.

Vote Count #2

IH - 1 (ThaCoolness)
MadCrawdad - 1 (nicoliosgotpolio)
nicoliosgotpolio - 2 (Sironigous, IH)
Sironigous - 1 (zwetschenwasser)
ThaCoolness - 1 (dejkha)
zwetschenwasser - 3 (MadCrawdad, Jazzmyn, rokovoj)

Not Voting: Crazy, Megatheory

6 to lynch and 4 to lynch at deadline.
Deadline is March 8.

[zwetschenwasser]

lol, it would take three more people to hop on to lynch you.

I've played with two of the players in this game, and I had nothing to say about ThaCoolness, so I voted for you. Not random, but completely arbitrary.

I would call you a tad panicky, zwetschenwasser.

You admit it would only take three more people to lynch me.

[rokovoj]

What do you mean by "admit?" It's not like I was trying to HIDE that three more people were required to lynch you. It's freely available information any idiot can pick up.

Putting you at L-3 is not scummy. When I said, "lol, it would take three more people to hop on to lynch you,"

it should be obvious

that I mean three people, which is a lot of people, would be required, so you aren't in danger of being quick lynched.

If you're trying to insinuate that I'm scum from this and since we have a total of three scum left, realize that at least one pro-town player would also have to vote you for you to die. Realize also that anyone who suddenly piles on votes resulting in the death of a town player immediately looks suspect. I wasn't putting you in any danger when I made that vote.

You are overreacting; however, since your forte seems to be making as little sense as possible, I'm undecided as to whether this is an indication that you are scum. In any case, I don't see a better spot for my vote, so I'll just let it dance next to your name for now.

[zwetschenwasser]

It is scummy. Especially since you're voting me for no reason.

[rokovoj]

I've already explained why it's not scummy, so I don't have much to say besides "you're wrong."

If you think it's scummy, why aren't you voting for me?

[rokovoj]

Also, explain WHY it is scummy, instead of just insisting that it is.

[zwetschenwasser]

Because I'm not an opportunistic OMGUSer. And it's too early in Day 1, especially since everyone's just sitting around watching the fist fight.

[rokovoj]

You've yet to respond to my post 55.

I think most of us are at work/school/doing something more productive, not purposely lurking.

[zwetschenwasser]

I already did.

[rokovoj]

Where?

[zwetschenwasser]

Up there.

[Crazy]

Well, that was weird. That was an ultra-terrible scum move. You other scum can feel free to do that.

There were only two people here that I've completed a game with before, and now there's only one, so

Vote: Megatheory

.

[zwetschenwasser]

That works.

[MadCrawdad]

Putting you at L-3 is not scummy. When I said, "lol, it would take three more people to hop on to lynch you,"

it should be obvious

that I mean three people, which is a lot of people, would be required, so you aren't in danger of being quick lynched.

It is scummy. Especially since you're voting me for no reason.

I've already explained why it's not scummy, so I don't have much to say besides "you're wrong."

If you think it's scummy, why aren't you voting for me?

Because I'm not an opportunistic OMGUSer. And it's too early in Day 1, especially since everyone's just sitting around watching the fist fight.

@zwet

zwet, you keep coming back to the fact that rokovoj is scummy for putting you at L-3. You're really hanging on here, so much that rokovoj asks why you're not voting for her... your response is 'Because I'm not an opportunistic OMGUSer.'

If you feel that someone is scum, it wouldn't really be an OMGUS, would it? Also, what would be opportunistic about it?

You seem really jumpy over nothing at this point.

[IH]

Sorry, I totally left class early, so I didn't post 20 minutes later.

ANYWAYS, time to draw some attention to things.

Take a look at posts 30-32

First he acknowledges the modkill and the first rule. Then he tries to blame it on something else. Then goes OOOHHH.

He could of done it for one of two reasons. First of all to try to either misdirect away from the scum's daykill, or just to try to offer a different explanation. I'm gonna go with the first one this early in the game.

If I wasn't voting for Nicolios I'd be voting for Jazzmyn, just for knowing the rules (or at least being intimate with one certain rule). It is very much possible that the scum had already discussed the idea of potentially sacrificing a member (though that sounds like a kind of a silly plan.) That would be another kind of a hunch thing though.

Unvote; vote: IH

There was hardly anything said at that point... how could you have a case against anyone?

I just said it wasn't a random vote.

Well, that was weird. That was an ultra-terrible scum move. You other scum can feel free to do that.

There were only two people here that I've completed a game with before, and now there's only one, so Vote: Megatheory.

FoS:Crazy

in regards to Jeeps list of scumtells.

also

unvote, vote:Zet

At this point this is a much better vote than my hunch one. Reasons coming in next post to break up a block of text.

[IH]

Zwet is being very panicky about the votes on him. First off, he would have nothing to fear if he was really a townie. three people jumping on him to lynch would be at least ONE of the three remaining scum if he was to be quicklynched. Not to mention he's automatically trying to cast suspicion on the THIRD VOTE ON HIM. Putting someone at LYNCH MINUS THREE is most definitely not "opportunistic"

Post 52 by Rokovoj explains this all pretty well.

One of the most interesting things is post 56

Because I'm not an opportunistic OMGUSer.

And it's too early in Day 1, especially since everyone's just sitting around watching the fist fight.

I interpret this as "See everyone, I'm not opportunistic, OR an OMGUSer!!!

[nicoliosgotpolio]

He could of done it for one of two reasons. First of all to try to either misdirect away from the scum's daykill, or just to try to offer a different explanation. I'm gonna go with the first one this early in the game.

To start off with something that has nothing to do with anything, I'm female.
Second, I've never played a game where the mod has posted the tally in a players post. I didn't know it was Caboose.

And it's too early in Day 1, especially since everyone's just sitting around watching the fist fight.

I believe I've already told you I have a life, thank you.
And though I've already said we shouldn't use previous games against people, you did lurk last game, and you had a power role. MOST people won't sit around and watch a fist fight. Some people, as rokovoj said, have better things to do.

[Crazy]

Yeah, I had guessed that was why IH had voted Nicolio.

As for the zwet wagon, I don't see how being panicky is a scum-tell.

[IH]

Yeah, I had guessed that was why IH had voted Nicolio.

As for the zwet wagon, I don't see how being panicky is a scum-tell.

He's more worried about self preservation, and throwing suspicion on someone who's put him at LYNCH MINUS 3.

I'm saying that's scummy.

[rokovoj]

If I wasn't voting for Nicolios I'd be voting for Jazzmyn, just for knowing the rules (or at least being intimate with one certain rule). It is very much possible that the scum had already discussed the idea of potentially sacrificing a member (though that sounds like a kind of a silly plan.) That would be another kind of a hunch thing though.

I don't see why Jazzmyn is suspicious for this. I should hope that all of us (except.. apparently nicolios) read the game rules at some point.

[Sironigous]

What the heck.. Zwet on L-2 already?

I would say Crawdad's and Jazzmyn's votes are random, as they were posted before any real content.

Rok and Zwet seem like they are just bickering.

But IH, voting Zwet to L-2?

First you say you want to get Nicolios...

Now you say you want to get Zwet, without retracting anything said against Nicolios. You just jumped on that mini bandwagon that just turned larger with your vote.

Why switch?.. and are you anxious for an early lynch?
Explain yourself...

Until then,
I

Vote: IH

[dejkha]

Not much for me to comment on on other than Zwets overreaction to random votes. Zwet, putting you at at the half way mark with a random vote on page is 2 hardly scummy at all. If someone were to put you at L-2 then I'd understand, but L-3 made up of random votes isn't serious. I really don't see why'd you get jumpy about it.

FoS: Zwet

I don't suspect you for that enough to vote.

Killa, if you don't start posting soon with useful content and answering questions that you were asked, you'll be sure to receive my vote.

[zwetschenwasser]

OMG! Sironigous doesn't even recognize IH has a case on me, and says that voting someone at all is bad? Obvscum.

Confirm Vote: Sironigous

IH, I did find that third vote opportunistic. And I don't like that Rok hasn't unvoted for absolutely no reason.

[rokovoj]

dejkha, who do you mean by "killa?"

zwets, for the third time now, explain why my vote was scummy. Just claiming it is doesn't make it so.

I do have a reason for not unvoting. You're overreacting, being nonsensical, and there isn't anyone else for whom I'd rather be voting.

Is that vote on Sironigous serious?

[dejkha]

dejkha, who do you mean by "killa?"

oh sorry. He's in another game I'm playing.