Mini 743: Sanity Ensues - Over!
-
-
seb456zig Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 189
- Joined: September 8, 2007
- Location: 32 Hydra runway, the little island
-
-
ZEEnon Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 815
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Canada
how could you forgot about masons,
they are the best !
just kidding, i think I forgot too . :[
plus this is My first game,
so i wasn't really expecting any
other roles, haha .
if THE cop is killed before day four,
how DO you expect them to
even have a Chance to reveal Their results ?
how do you even know we have a cop ?
the title does make it seem like
the mafia has a certain advantage of some sort .. :[
OR like seb456zig mentioned,
we may have a naive cop .-
-
seb456zig Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 189
- Joined: September 8, 2007
- Location: 32 Hydra runway, the little island
-
-
ZEEnon Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 815
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Canada
-
-
seb456zig Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 189
- Joined: September 8, 2007
- Location: 32 Hydra runway, the little island
[i][u][b]I'm slightly older than Ani, that makes me slightly better than him![/b][/u][/i]-
-
ZEEnon Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 815
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Canada
-
-
Azhrei Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 462
- Joined: December 16, 2008
- Location: Australia
Phew, one thread down, one to go...
First off, thanks Seb
Second, after rereading the thread, I think I've managed to get a bit of a read on most everyone. In no way is that read conclusive, but I do have reasons for it all. So, list!
1.Tom ~ Town, I think. Consistent, and he seems to be genuinely working for the town.
2.hohum ~ Scummy. He dodges questions and jumps on people for little reason, and seems somewhat hypocritical to me.
3.alexhans ~ I'm not so sure... I've seen some thing I've thought are scummy, but I also have seen some things that seem townie. I'm more in favour of town at the moment though.
4.ZEEnon ~ Newbie, but the question is, newbie town, or newbie scum. I'm not sure. (and, please, could, you, type, normally, it, screws, my, head, over)
5.Charrat ~ Doing a classic Charrat. I have no clue. (Charrat, I hate you )
6.Green Crayons ~ Townie, I'm reasonably sure. One of the few people who has been totally consistent, and seems wholly for the town.
7.Artem ~ I dunno. I'm 50/50 on Artem. Earlier on, I thought he seemed scummy, but later on, I didn't think so.
8.seb456zig ~ I'm inclined towards townie, he seems to be acting that way.
9.Magus_Stragus ~ I think townie, but I'm definitely not sure.
Now, the problem with this list is that I'm obviously wrong somewhere. I've only got 1 person who I consider to be scum, a few unsures, and then townies. And the chances of there being only 1 scum in a 10 player game are very low in my experience, and I'd expect 2-3. Also, I'm happy to offer clarification on my views.
So, which one of you is the other one? I'm intrigued. Nobody really seems to be buddying Hohum, so nothing obvious there. (Smart move, I'd say) In fact, annoyingly, I'm a little puzzled. So, while I'm still keeping my eye out for other scum, I'm gonna focus on Hohum, who I find the scummiest here. And I'd really, really like him to respond to my accusations. (Or any of the others levelled against him.)
It really starts way back on page 2.
First, what do you even mean by OMGUS-by-proxy? Second, what the hell is a OMGUS related term even doing here? I believe others asked this of you before, and I can't find you answering it satisfactorily, if at all.hohum wrote:
OMGUS-by-proxy? You really are reaching for conclusions right now.Artem wrote: Are you trying to cover up your scumbuddy Hohum?
FoS: Artem
As I believe Green Crayons points out soon after this post, you said voting for serious reasons so early on was scummy, then voted for a serious reason. I believe the term 'double-standards' has come up before ,and it most definitely applies here. Are you special, or did a few extra posts make the world of difference, hm?hohum wrote:I know I'm probably going to catch a little flak for this but I'm going to go ahead and:
Unvote
Vote: Artem
Because I just can't ignore 3 scum tells in 2 pages. I was in one of your first games too, so I know that you know better.
My justification is of course:
1) A serious vote this early in day 1. Seriously? And over a stupid reason too: Screwed up quote tags. This demonstrates that you don't really care enough about scum hunting to actually pay any real attention to this thread.
2) Seriously? Tunnel vision?Artem wrote: FoS: alexhans for having double standards. I've been posting in other games too
3) He was talking within the context of a Meta read on me. How is that defending me from any onslaught of attack? My vote was RANDOM and I think people will get that.Artem wrote:Are you trying to cover up your scumbuddy Hohum?
So here, you quote someone reasonably explaining why they hadn't posted a zillion times (we do have lives) and then seem to insinuate they are lurking by saying lurking is scummy. Also, you restate your 'Serious votes are not likely at this point in the game' thing, so obviously, those few posts didn't make that much of a difference.hohum wrote:
1) IGMEOY means I've got my eye on you. It's like a step below FoS (IMHO)seb456zig wrote:@hohum: whats an IGMEOY, im guessing its a stronger version of a hos, but anyway...
@people accusing me of lurking: i hope you realise I dont spend all day on the computer, and when i am on the computer i would only check forums once. Dont you (Magus) think that voting a supposed lurker isnt smart this early in the game. Isnt it too early to even lurk? anyway...FoS:Magusbecause of trying to get me bandwagond for no real reason. Inactivity isnt a scumtell in my book, but i think posts that dont help the town are (like your one).
Could you please explain your logic on voting me so early in the game?
(i repeat myself a lot, sorry about that. Its a habit.)
2) It's still pretty early in D1 to be throwing votes around behind hard evidence -- and I'm all for wagoning people to get them to drop scum tells. I don't think necessarily Magus' approach is any less correct than the way it's usually been done
3) Actively lurking actually is a scum tell and that isn't a matter of opinion.
IGMEOY
It'll be interesting to see how you play from here on out.
Okay, you seem to be saying here (and you reinforce this later on) that for more minor things, some sort of mechanism that isn't a vote should be used to point it out. But then...hohum wrote:
Curious, why would you changed your vote instead of simply calling me out with a FoS, HoS or IGMEOY? And how could you be certain that you made the correct choice 3 pages in to day 1?ZEEnon wrote:oh okay good,
i was about to change my vote ..
Yay! More double standards. While I agree that the quoted post of Alexhans was a bit pointless and empty, I didn't really find it mega-scummy. I'd rate it at FoS level, if that. But no, you vote him for it, in direct contradiction of what you've earlier said. Huh?hohum wrote:
I'm sure if you went back and re-read the thread you could find SOMETHING to comment on. It isn't like we're still 3 pages in and just coming out of the random voting stage or somethingalexhans wrote:Well. I want to contribute but really don't find much to say... Everyone seems to explain they're votes as Pressure votes so we can't jump at them...
This is exactly what you just did.alexhans wrote:I also don't believe that a bit of inactivity is a scum tell. Experiencedplayers won't go lurking if they're scum in fear of being replaced. They may add little to the conversation though.
See my comment above about re-reading the thread.alexhans wrote:Who hasnt voted yet? Why?
In short:
Vote: alexhans
Seems a little pointless to me.hohum wrote:Thanks for the OMGUS FOS, now I have more than just your comment to go on.
Why the turnaround? You seemed very convinced earlier on, and you kinda just switch here, without saying much in the way of reason.hohum wrote:
You're not looking as scummy to me as you did now that I'm taking Alex's most recent posts into context. I (for whatever reason) confused you with Azi in Open 69.Artem wrote: some stuff that's not relevant to what I'm saying.
-Daniel
(only page 5? Kill me, please)
Probing question just seems like an excuse, usable in any situation for just about anything. And then I don't quite understand why you quote yourself, and seem to tell yourself off? Please, explain.hohum wrote:
Please don't answer questions on behalf of other people. You're more than welcome comment and call my motives into question AFTER he answers it.hohum wrote:
It was a probing question, I ask it all the time.Artem wrote:You have no problems flinging your vote around, yet somehow you feel that you deserve a special treatment. What's with the double standards?
As such,Vote:Hohum
And that's about it. hohum, I'm really interested in your response to this (or lack of it). Everyone else, I'm intrigued by what you think as well.
Now, to my other thread..."He was cooler than Samuel L. Jackson on dope" - Raccon-
-
Artem Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1229
- Joined: April 15, 2008
1. Not going to answer, for obvious reasons.Charrat wrote:Well, since things have cooled down a little bit, I will pose a few questions for anyone who would like to answer and maybe spark some more discussion.
1. At this moment, are there any players that you believe are town? If so, why?
2. At this moment, are there any players that you suspect are mafia? If so, why?
3. How would you choose who to lynch today if you do not yet have any suspicions of who may be mafia?
2. I suspect hohum is mafia. His bending of the facts and incorrect use of terminology gives him an excuse to vote players for whom he has little to no reason to vote otherwise. I think he's wants to appear scumhunting.
3. I'm voting for hohum, who I believe is mafia.-
-
alexhans Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1326
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Bs.As Argentina
So true... I think the cop should act as he deems wise. Period. Planning openly just gives hints to the mafia. Unless it is really helpful to the town we should exercise caution.Zeenon wrote:if THE cop is killed before day four,
how DO you expect them to
even have a Chance to reveal Their results ?
how do you even know we have a cop ?
What does this means? I hope youre not playing the aforementioned cardZeenon wrote: plus this is My first game,
so i wasn't really expecting any
other roles, haha .
We all would.Azhrei wrote: I'm gonna focus on Hohum, who I find the scummiest here. And I'd really, really like him to respond to my accusations. (Or any of the others levelled against him.)
Everything you ask to hohum ive mentioned it in my last posts... He is inconsistent and evasive.
This is are hard questions to answer... I don't see how they can help the Town so much. Im so paranoid that It'll probably give more ideas to the mafia as to how f%&/($ lost I may be about who to acusse. Through my posts you have read what points I've made about certain players (Artem and Hohum) but then I have a lot of not-really-supported suspicions about other players that I can not effectively state. And I always doubt till the last minute, suppose the most innocent looking guy was scumm?Charrat wrote: Well, since things have cooled down a little bit, I will pose a few questions for anyone who would like to answer and maybe spark some more discussion.
1. At this moment, are there any players that you believe are town? If so, why?
2. At this moment, are there any players that you suspect are mafia? If so, why?
3. How would you choose who to lynch today if you do not yet have any suspicions of who may be mafia?
3. Right now (This can change any second to any player) Im between Artem (My vote is there still) and Hohum.
I'm in no hurry to lynch anyone although I might had looked like I was when I asked who hadn't voted yet.
One more thing. Reading Azhrei's List I realized that the only ones who are possible scums are Artem,Hohum and me... We 3 that fought against each other while the others contributed with more fire... Isn't the obvious choice that only we will look scummy as we are the only ones doing any actual discussing and acussing. We have to discuss further and get more participation from everybody before we reach any conclusion.-
-
seb456zig Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 189
- Joined: September 8, 2007
- Location: 32 Hydra runway, the little island
HoS:hohumbut id prefer not to vote until i can find my own reasons (which seems realy hard, coz all the good ones have been taken
MFoS:Charratbecause asking questions like that is just telling the mafia what the town thinks about each other. Could you please tell me (us) why you need to know?
(MFoS suspision gained from alexhans's previous post {133})[i][u][b]I'm slightly older than Ani, that makes me slightly better than him![/b][/u][/i]-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
Well it's obvious that I'm going to go down in flames.
I've already explained why I called Artem's move an OMGUS. I've tried to probe for information but every question I ask gets picked apart before it can get answered. There's scum on my wagon, methinks.
I stand by my reasoning for flip-flopping on Artem. It's too early in the game to have any concrete suspicions, that's what makes it so easy for me to abandon my initial suspicions.-
-
Azhrei Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 462
- Joined: December 16, 2008
- Location: Australia
alexhans wrote:
We all would.Azhrei wrote: -Stuff bout concentrating on Hohum
Everything you ask to hohum ive mentioned it in my last posts... He is inconsistent and evasive.
I know, I thought that perhaps one big post with everything in it might make it easier for him.
Personally, I've found Charrat's questions to be useful in the past. They tend to spark some discussion if things die down (I've played with him a few times before, he tends to post a similar set every game). The problem is, he posts them regardless of his alignment. I've seen him post them in games as both scum and town. So it's really a null-tell. Oh, and I'm pretty sure I indirectly answered them with my list.alexhans wrote:
This is are hard questions to answer... I don't see how they can help the Town so much. Im so paranoid that It'll probably give more ideas to the mafia as to how f%&/($ lost I may be about who to acusse. Through my posts you have read what points I've made about certain players (Artem and Hohum) but then I have a lot of not-really-supported suspicions about other players that I can not effectively state. And I always doubt till the last minute, suppose the most innocent looking guy was scumm?Charrat wrote: -Charrat's questions-
3. Right now (This can change any second to any player) Im between Artem (My vote is there still) and Hohum.
I'm in no hurry to lynch anyone although I might had looked like I was when I asked who hadn't voted yet.
And ZEEnon, newb boy, too. And as I pointed out, my list was by no means conclusive. And you're right, most of the scummy things you and Artem did were while you fought. And yes, I agree with you, moar discussion, even if I'm not the best myself.alexhans wrote:
One more thing. Reading Azhrei's List I realized that the only ones who are possible scums are Artem,Hohum and me... We 3 that fought against each other while the others contributed with more fire... Isn't the obvious choice that only we will look scummy as we are the only ones doing any actual discussing and acussing. We have to discuss further and get more participation from everybody before we reach any conclusion.
I checked that explanation, and I don't really find it satisfactory. And yes, there probably is scum on your wagon somewhere, or will be soon. Regardless of your alignment, it'd be a stupid partner (or partners, as the case may be) that didn't recognize that the town was leaning towards you being scum already.hohum wrote: Well it's obvious that I'm going to go down in flames.
I've already explained why I called Artem's move an OMGUS. I've tried to probe for information but every question I ask gets picked apart before it can get answered. There's scum on my wagon, methinks.
I stand by my reasoning for flip-flopping on Artem. It's too early in the game to have any concrete suspicions, that's what makes it so easy for me to abandon my initial suspicions.
And you really haven't answered much else I (and others) have said. I'd suggest perhaps quoting my post, because I think it contains most of the arguments against you, and answering each accusation. But you know, that's just what I think."He was cooler than Samuel L. Jackson on dope" - Raccon-
-
ZEEnon Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 815
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Canada
although i enjoy this game the most out of my current games,
some of you can be really ANNOYING at times .
Azhrei wrote:4.ZEEnon ~ Newbie, but the question is, newbie town, or newbie scum. I'm not sure. (and, please, could, you, type, normally, it, screws, my, head, over)Azhrei wrote:And ZEEnon, newb boy, too.
@ Azhrei, there was no reason to includealexhans wrote:What does this means? I hope youre not playing the aforementioned card
the word newbie .. if that affects your vote
then you are clearly misguided .
if i never stated i was new to this,
you would never be able to tell .
can you guys get over this ?
did i ask for anyone to go easy on me ? no .
i merely stated a fact .
i don't think you are reading carefully
enough, or you are mafia becaaaaause
i mentioned this fact a LONG time ago :
whether or not i'm new doesn'tZEEnon wrote:this is my first game too, Magus_Stragus,
but you don't see me announcing it to the world ..
oh wait, I guess i just did .
affect my ability to play the game.
normally it COULD, but i played
so much in real life, the only difference
is that i had to learn the acronyms,
which i easily did through the wiki .-
-
Azhrei Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 462
- Joined: December 16, 2008
- Location: Australia
You're misunderstanding what I'm saying entirely, person-who-types-annoyingly. I'd have been calling you newbie regardless of whether or not you'd said it, because that's how you're acting. I'm calling you newbie, because you're acting like one. It doesn't influence my vote at all, because I'm still trying to figure out what type of newbie you're acting like.ZEEnon wrote:although i enjoy this game the most out of my current games,
some of you can be really ANNOYING at times .
Azhrei wrote:4.ZEEnon ~ Newbie, but the question is, newbie town, or newbie scum. I'm not sure. (and, please, could, you, type, normally, it, screws, my, head, over)Azhrei wrote:And ZEEnon, newb boy, too.
@ Azhrei, there was no reason to includealexhans wrote:What does this means? I hope youre not playing the aforementioned card
the word newbie .. if that affects your vote
then you are clearly misguided .
if i never stated i was new to this,
you would never be able to tell .
can you guys get over this ?
did i ask for anyone to go easy on me ? no .
i merely stated a fact .
i don't think you are reading carefully
enough, or you are mafia becaaaaause
i mentioned this fact a LONG time ago :
whether or not i'm new doesn'tZEEnon wrote:this is my first game too, Magus_Stragus,
but you don't see me announcing it to the world ..
oh wait, I guess i just did .
affect my ability to play the game.
normally it COULD, but i played
so much in real life, the only difference
is that i had to learn the acronyms,
which i easily did through the wiki ."He was cooler than Samuel L. Jackson on dope" - Raccon-
-
ZEEnon
-
-
Charrat Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 98
- Joined: December 2, 2008
Asking a broad set of querstions is something I like to do when the conversation is slower than I would like it to be. It sometimes helps spark discussion, and thats always a good thing for the town. I do agree that answering those questions will tell the mafia what the town thinks, but there is not necessarily any harm in that, is there? The mafia already have the most important information; who is on their team, and who is not. The people who are in the dark is the town. The town players are who need to understand what other players are thinking because that is all the information we have that allows us to lynch the right people.seb456zig wrote:MFoS:Charratbecause asking questions like that is just telling the mafia what the town thinks about each other. Could you please tell me (us) why you need to know?
Also, everytime we post in this thread we tell other players what we think (or what we want to appear to think), so answering these questions (or any other) is just another layer of information that we have to make the best voting choices we can. If we tried to play this game without ever telling the mafia what we think, it would be an awfully quiet game.Play [url=http://www.war-facts.com/?p=15465&i=h1]WARRING FACTIONS[/url], a notoriously addictive free strategy game played in a browser OR an utterly complex and unforgiving real-time strategy.-
-
seb456zig Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 189
- Joined: September 8, 2007
- Location: 32 Hydra runway, the little island
Huh, okay... sounds believableCharrat wrote:
Asking a broad set of querstions is something I like to do when the conversation is slower than I would like it to be. It sometimes helps spark discussion, and thats always a good thing for the town. I do agree that answering those questions will tell the mafia what the town thinks, but there is not necessarily any harm in that, is there? The mafia already have the most important information; who is on their team, and who is not. The people who are in the dark is the town. The town players are who need to understand what other players are thinking because that is all the information we have that allows us to lynch the right people.seb456zig wrote:MFoS:Charratbecause asking questions like that is just telling the mafia what the town thinks about each other. Could you please tell me (us) why you need to know?
Also, everytime we post in this thread we tell other players what we think (or what we want to appear to think), so answering these questions (or any other) is just another layer of information that we have to make the best voting choices we can. If we tried to play this game without ever telling the mafia what we think, it would be an awfully quiet game.
1. Myself (stupid WIFOM contradicts this)Charrat wrote: 1. At this moment, are there any players that you believe are town? If so, why?
2. At this moment, are there any players that you suspect are mafia? If so, why?
3. How would you choose who to lynch today if you do not yet have any suspicions of who may be mafia?
2. ZEEnon & possibly hohum. ZEEnon plays a lot like Chuck Norris did in my first game (go look me up and META!!!) I dont have any of my own reasons for hohum but others seem to think he's realy scummie and when i find any scum behaviorBAMone point for the town, but until then ima listen to his reasoning.
3.Hmm... that's a tough one. Maybe the one that contradicts themself the most[i][u][b]I'm slightly older than Ani, that makes me slightly better than him![/b][/u][/i]-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
I have attempted to answer your questions, along with everyone else's. You reject my explanations. It's not going to matter what I say to you, so why bother trying? You're just going to sit there and twist and contort my posts until they mean exactly what YOU want them to mean -- I'm scum.Azrehi wrote:I checked that explanation, and I don't really find it satisfactory. And yes, there probably is scum on your wagon somewhere, or will be soon. Regardless of your alignment, it'd be a stupid partner (or partners, as the case may be) that didn't recognize that the town was leaning towards you being scum already.
And you really haven't answered much else I (and others) have said. I'd suggest perhaps quoting my post, because I think it contains most of the arguments against you, and answering each accusation. But you know, that's just what I think.-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
I must apologize, my activity in this game has gone below my intentions. With the assumption that this day will continue to persist well after friday (my last day of hectic work that's been consuming my time for the past week or so), I intend to keep my vote where it is until I can play a little catch up."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
ZEEnon Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 815
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Canada
i like how i'm suspected because i actseb456zig wrote:2. ZEEnon & possibly hohum. ZEEnon plays a lot like Chuck Norris did in my first game (go look me up and META!!!) I dont have any of my own reasons for hohum but others seem to think he's realy scummie and when i find any scum behaviorBAMone point for the town, but until then ima listen to his reasoning.
like someone else you know
from a previous game .
*imitates childish voice*
bad people wear black..
you wear black..
your a BAD person ! :O
(there is no difference between your
post, and this childish remark)
i also find it funny
how people are suspecting me
due to me mentioning this
is my first game . that is a very
scumish thing to say playing online i guess .
at least i'm learning new things .......-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
Can you PLEASE stop posting in this manner. Nobody else on the site does it.ZEEnon wrote:
i like how i'm suspected because i actseb456zig wrote:2. ZEEnon & possibly hohum. ZEEnon plays a lot like Chuck Norris did in my first game (go look me up and META!!!) I dont have any of my own reasons for hohum but others seem to think he's realy scummie and when i find any scum behaviorBAMone point for the town, but until then ima listen to his reasoning.
like someone else you know
from a previous game .
*imitates childish voice*
bad people wear black..
you wear black..
your a BAD person ! :O
(there is no difference between your
post, and this childish remark)
i also find it funny
how people are suspecting me
due to me mentioning this
is my first game . that is a very
scumish thing to say playing online i guess .
at least i'm learning new things .......-
-
ZEEnon
-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
The funny thing about anti-conformists is that they don't realize if you're always moving in the exact opposite direction of the herd, then they're still dictating your movements; now aren't they?ZEEnon wrote:i don't conform .
Seriously, stop it. You're not just being "the cool kid" by doing that, you're making it difficult for people to read your posts by disrupting the flow of your sentences.-
-
ZEEnon Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 815
- Joined: January 30, 2009
- Location: Canada
-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
God you're a raging faggot. The only thing good about this game is that I'm going to be lynched today.ZEEnon wrote:but not conforming,
i'm doing just the opposite,
trying NOT to be "the cool kid" .
you contradicted yourself there .
i'm no longer replying to posts
about my typing style,
it's now against my newly-made religion .
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
-
-