Mini 703 - A Roccisi Autumn - Over


User avatar
Adel
Adel
Crystalline Logick
User avatar
User avatar
Adel
Crystalline Logick
Crystalline Logick
Posts: 6743
Joined: May 23, 2007
Location: Central Oregon / High Desert

Post Post #1075 (ISO) » Thu Jan 29, 2009 3:43 pm

Post by Adel »

just to be clear, when I claimed "no gun" I meant that I do not have one now, and I never did have one.

Is the same true for everyone else?
User avatar
Kison
Kison
.GIFted
User avatar
User avatar
Kison
.GIFted
.GIFted
Posts: 6714
Joined: January 22, 2007

Post Post #1076 (ISO) » Thu Jan 29, 2009 3:53 pm

Post by Kison »

Yes.
User avatar
Adel
Adel
Crystalline Logick
User avatar
User avatar
Adel
Crystalline Logick
Crystalline Logick
Posts: 6743
Joined: May 23, 2007
Location: Central Oregon / High Desert

Post Post #1077 (ISO) » Thu Jan 29, 2009 4:07 pm

Post by Adel »

anyhow, I'm down for lynching IP without further discussion.
User avatar
Adel
Adel
Crystalline Logick
User avatar
User avatar
Adel
Crystalline Logick
Crystalline Logick
Posts: 6743
Joined: May 23, 2007
Location: Central Oregon / High Desert

Post Post #1078 (ISO) » Thu Jan 29, 2009 4:16 pm

Post by Adel »

I double-checked my work, and I am sure that lynching IP at this time is the correct move for optimal town results.
User avatar
Adel
Adel
Crystalline Logick
User avatar
User avatar
Adel
Crystalline Logick
Crystalline Logick
Posts: 6743
Joined: May 23, 2007
Location: Central Oregon / High Desert

Post Post #1079 (ISO) » Thu Jan 29, 2009 4:46 pm

Post by Adel »

afatchic wrote:
Korts wrote:This paragraph seems particularly wishy-washy, even for you, afatchic. You first state that Adel's predecessor is definitely scummy, then you assume he's town, then you demand an explanation from Adel; and finally you conclude that right now she's probably a townie. I sense a connection; such uncertainty makes me think of a partnership where you can't decide whether to bus, distance or defend.
I said his play was extremely terrible, with all the rolefishing and everything... but then i thought about it and came to a logical conclusion why town-BoW would do that. im not asking Adel to explain why he did it.
I just think my conclusion will be proven one way or the other in a lylo mass claim
. if it goes the way i think it will, their would be no reason to suspect him, if it goes the other, i would be highly suspicious of him.
the part in bold is interesting.
User avatar
insanepenguin02
insanepenguin02
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
insanepenguin02
Goon
Goon
Posts: 312
Joined: December 6, 2008

Post Post #1080 (ISO) » Thu Jan 29, 2009 5:10 pm

Post by insanepenguin02 »

Well, Adel, if you want to lynch me, I can't necessarily stop you but I do have to say that you would be killing a townie. Then your actions will have to be questioned very heavily. My vote stands on afatchic.
User avatar
insanepenguin02
insanepenguin02
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
insanepenguin02
Goon
Goon
Posts: 312
Joined: December 6, 2008

Post Post #1081 (ISO) » Thu Jan 29, 2009 5:10 pm

Post by insanepenguin02 »

Adel wrote:just to be clear, when I claimed "no gun" I meant that I do not have one now, and I never did have one.

Is the same true for everyone else?
And yes here - no gun at any point in time
User avatar
Adel
Adel
Crystalline Logick
User avatar
User avatar
Adel
Crystalline Logick
Crystalline Logick
Posts: 6743
Joined: May 23, 2007
Location: Central Oregon / High Desert

Post Post #1082 (ISO) » Thu Jan 29, 2009 5:15 pm

Post by Adel »

why are you against a massclaim IP?
User avatar
afatchic
afatchic
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
afatchic
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2425
Joined: August 4, 2008

Post Post #1083 (ISO) » Thu Jan 29, 2009 6:17 pm

Post by afatchic »

Adel wrote:
afatchic wrote:
Korts wrote:This paragraph seems particularly wishy-washy, even for you, afatchic. You first state that Adel's predecessor is definitely scummy, then you assume he's town, then you demand an explanation from Adel; and finally you conclude that right now she's probably a townie. I sense a connection; such uncertainty makes me think of a partnership where you can't decide whether to bus, distance or defend.
I said his play was extremely terrible, with all the rolefishing and everything... but then i thought about it and came to a logical conclusion why town-BoW would do that. im not asking Adel to explain why he did it.
I just think my conclusion will be proven one way or the other in a lylo mass claim
. if it goes the way i think it will, their would be no reason to suspect him, if it goes the other, i would be highly suspicious of him.
the part in bold is interesting.
Would you like me to clarify?Also i had no indication of ever having a gun...
Show
Now taking sign ups:
The Fast and the Furious Mafia (Mini Theme)(11 spots left)

Upcoming Games:
The Bible Experience Mafia (Mini Theme)

Crazy Cops Mafia (Open Game)

Pre-In's are welcome for any of them.
User avatar
Adel
Adel
Crystalline Logick
User avatar
User avatar
Adel
Crystalline Logick
Crystalline Logick
Posts: 6743
Joined: May 23, 2007
Location: Central Oregon / High Desert

Post Post #1084 (ISO) » Thu Jan 29, 2009 6:27 pm

Post by Adel »

why did you expect massclaim to occur at lylo?
User avatar
afatchic
afatchic
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
afatchic
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2425
Joined: August 4, 2008

Post Post #1085 (ISO) » Thu Jan 29, 2009 7:00 pm

Post by afatchic »

Adel wrote:why did you expect massclaim to occur at lylo?
when would it normally? never actually had to do a mass claim in a game i have played. actually, i have one time, but that was because almost every role was outed, and mass claim kinda broke the setup.
Show
Now taking sign ups:
The Fast and the Furious Mafia (Mini Theme)(11 spots left)

Upcoming Games:
The Bible Experience Mafia (Mini Theme)

Crazy Cops Mafia (Open Game)

Pre-In's are welcome for any of them.
User avatar
ThAdmiral
ThAdmiral
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
ThAdmiral
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5920
Joined: September 20, 2006
Location: The Hills

Post Post #1086 (ISO) » Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:05 pm

Post by ThAdmiral »

Adel wrote:
ThAdmiral wrote:dead people could be carrying the guns...hopefully.
what are your thoughts on the merits of a massclaim before this day is over?
We could do it but I don't think it would help.
User avatar
Korts
Korts
Luddite
User avatar
User avatar
Korts
Luddite
Luddite
Posts: 5752
Joined: January 1, 2008
Location: HUN BUD

Post Post #1087 (ISO) » Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:21 pm

Post by Korts »

Kison wrote:
Korts wrote:It's possible that the kill was used already; N3 may be the night. Doc/blocker had protected/blocked correctly N0 and more importantly N2, so I doubt N2 was the night unless the scum also have a blocker/doc and they scored a hit.
You do realize that what you're suggesting is impossible unless Rage committed suicide, right? Everyone here claimed not to have a gun, and unless some dumdum townie lied, Rage is the only other town aligned player who was alive during Night Three to have been able to use the gun to... well... kill himself. So it pretty much has to be a scum kill as far as I can tell. Look at it this way:

~~Night Three(assuming one scum, but it doesn't really matter for what I'm showing)~~
1)
Townie(still living)
->No gun, no reason to lie. Result: Not the murderer of Rage.
2)
Townie(still living)
->No gun, no reason to lie. Result: Not the murderer of Rage.
3)
Townie(still living)
->No gun, no reason to lie. Result: Not the murderer of Rage.
4)
Townie(still living)
->No gun, no reason to lie. Result: Not the murderer of Rage.
5)
Townie(still living)
->No gun, no reason to lie. Result: Not the murderer of Rage.
6)
Townie(still living)
->No gun, no reason to lie. Result: Not the murderer of Rage.
7)
Scum(still living)
->Possibly has a gun.
8)
Rage(dead)
->If he had a gun, it was not used successfully unless he decided to blow himself away. Result:
Prooooobably
not the murderer of Rage.

Anyone know if Rage was on anti-depressants?
Hahaha. Why are you excluding the possibility that a town player with the gun was blocked when they tried to shoot?
Adel wrote:just to be clear, when I claimed "no gun" I meant that I do not have one now, and I never did have one.

Is the same true for everyone else?
This is correct.

On the IP lynch: I don't follow why he's the optimal play. I'd rather lynch afatchic.
scumchat never die
User avatar
afatchic
afatchic
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
afatchic
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2425
Joined: August 4, 2008

Post Post #1088 (ISO) » Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:27 pm

Post by afatchic »

Korts wrote:Hahaha. Why are you excluding the possibility that a town player with the gun was blocked when they tried to shoot?
So then why would a town player have lied about the shot? everyone claimed "no gun" when that would have been some nice info to share during that "mass claim".
Korts wrote:On the IP lynch: I don't follow why he's the optimal play. I'd rather lynch afatchic.
Care to give a reason why?
Show
Now taking sign ups:
The Fast and the Furious Mafia (Mini Theme)(11 spots left)

Upcoming Games:
The Bible Experience Mafia (Mini Theme)

Crazy Cops Mafia (Open Game)

Pre-In's are welcome for any of them.
User avatar
Korts
Korts
Luddite
User avatar
User avatar
Korts
Luddite
Luddite
Posts: 5752
Joined: January 1, 2008
Location: HUN BUD

Post Post #1089 (ISO) » Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:32 pm

Post by Korts »

afatchic wrote:So then why would a town player have lied about the shot? everyone claimed "no gun" when that would have been some nice info to share during that "mass claim".
True. Rage or scum having the gun is the likeliest possibility, and if the former is the case scum could've blocked Rage in anticipation of a protect.
afatchic wrote:Care to give a reason why?
Because I think you're scum, obv.
scumchat never die
User avatar
afatchic
afatchic
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
afatchic
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2425
Joined: August 4, 2008

Post Post #1090 (ISO) » Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:38 pm

Post by afatchic »

Korts wrote:
afatchic wrote:So then why would a town player have lied about the shot? everyone claimed "no gun" when that would have been some nice info to share during that "mass claim".
True. Rage or scum having the gun is the likeliest possibility, and if the former is the case scum could've blocked Rage in anticipation of a protect.
afatchic wrote:Care to give a reason why?
Because I think you're scum, obv.
So you are saying he died by a Roleblock?!

Glad your reason was nice and detailed.
Show
Now taking sign ups:
The Fast and the Furious Mafia (Mini Theme)(11 spots left)

Upcoming Games:
The Bible Experience Mafia (Mini Theme)

Crazy Cops Mafia (Open Game)

Pre-In's are welcome for any of them.
User avatar
Kison
Kison
.GIFted
User avatar
User avatar
Kison
.GIFted
.GIFted
Posts: 6714
Joined: January 22, 2007

Post Post #1091 (ISO) » Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:57 pm

Post by Kison »

Korts wrote:Hahaha. Why are you excluding the possibility that a town player with the gun was blocked when they tried to shoot?
I guess I epicfail at explaining things. :lol:

Here is the reason:

1) The only town players who were alive when Rage died are still alive now.
2) Everyone claimed no gun.

On the off chance that your question is the following: Why did you assume everyone who claimed no gun meant they didn't have one in the past?

My answer is: Because it seemed pretty obvious that it was inclusive in the question posed to us when we claimed. Maybe I'm wrong. Anyone want to claim they used a gun in the past?
User avatar
Adel
Adel
Crystalline Logick
User avatar
User avatar
Adel
Crystalline Logick
Crystalline Logick
Posts: 6743
Joined: May 23, 2007
Location: Central Oregon / High Desert

Post Post #1092 (ISO) » Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:10 pm

Post by Adel »

afatchic wrote:
Adel wrote:
afatchic wrote:
Korts wrote:This paragraph seems particularly wishy-washy, even for you, afatchic. You first state that Adel's predecessor is definitely scummy, then you assume he's town, then you demand an explanation from Adel; and finally you conclude that right now she's probably a townie. I sense a connection; such uncertainty makes me think of a partnership where you can't decide whether to bus, distance or defend.
I said his play was extremely terrible, with all the rolefishing and everything... but then i thought about it and came to a logical conclusion why town-BoW would do that. im not asking Adel to explain why he did it.
I just think my conclusion will be proven one way or the other in a lylo mass claim
. if it goes the way i think it will, their would be no reason to suspect him, if it goes the other, i would be highly suspicious of him.
the part in bold is interesting.
Would you like me to clarify?Also i had no indication of ever having a gun...
afatchic wrote:
Adel wrote:why did you expect massclaim to occur at lylo?
when would it normally? never actually had to do a mass claim in a game i have played. actually, i have one time, but that was because almost every role was outed, and mass claim kinda broke the setup.
@afatchic:
1. what role do you think I have?
2. what was your logical conclusion going to be based off of what I might have claimed?
3. Why did you expect that both of us would still be alive in lylo?
4. Why did you think that holding onto a way to accurately test my alignment until lylo was a good idea?

Answer these questions in a full and detailed manner quickly, or else I will vote for you.
User avatar
afatchic
afatchic
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
afatchic
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2425
Joined: August 4, 2008

Post Post #1093 (ISO) » Thu Jan 29, 2009 11:12 pm

Post by afatchic »

Adel go ahead and vote for me. i work all day friday, and will be V/La this weekend, so had i not checked it right now before i go to bed, i wouldn't have answered until monday night. so if you are going to vote me because my answer isn't quick enough then go ahead.

Now that im aggravated lets answer the questions.
1)some sort of amnesiac role. im thinking amnesiac watcher. which is why you pulled the wifom bait of trying to get killed. I think this is why your predecessor started each day off by asking "did anyone get any useful information?" I think he was a PR, however he didn't get his own results, so he would ask at the start of the day if anyone got useful results.
2) see above
3) if we weren't alive, would it have mattered?
4) i don't think that trying to out your role any time sooner would have been a good idea.

Other than that i can't begin to think of a reason why he would have acted as scummy as he did at the start of each day, and thus, if this is not the case, i will gladly put my vote on you.
Show
Now taking sign ups:
The Fast and the Furious Mafia (Mini Theme)(11 spots left)

Upcoming Games:
The Bible Experience Mafia (Mini Theme)

Crazy Cops Mafia (Open Game)

Pre-In's are welcome for any of them.
User avatar
Adel
Adel
Crystalline Logick
User avatar
User avatar
Adel
Crystalline Logick
Crystalline Logick
Posts: 6743
Joined: May 23, 2007
Location: Central Oregon / High Desert

Post Post #1094 (ISO) » Thu Jan 29, 2009 11:14 pm

Post by Adel »

thanks. Can we lynch IP now?
User avatar
Korts
Korts
Luddite
User avatar
User avatar
Korts
Luddite
Luddite
Posts: 5752
Joined: January 1, 2008
Location: HUN BUD

Post Post #1095 (ISO) » Thu Jan 29, 2009 11:16 pm

Post by Korts »

@Kison, sorry. I realize on second thought you're right. I forgot to take into consideration the all-round no gun claims. So either Rage had a gun or one of the scum did or does is the conclusion we can draw here.
scumchat never die
User avatar
Korts
Korts
Luddite
User avatar
User avatar
Korts
Luddite
Luddite
Posts: 5752
Joined: January 1, 2008
Location: HUN BUD

Post Post #1096 (ISO) » Thu Jan 29, 2009 11:18 pm

Post by Korts »

Adel, can you give me a quick rundown of why IP is the optimal lynch now?
scumchat never die
User avatar
TDC
TDC
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
TDC
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2108
Joined: January 25, 2008
Location: Berlin, Germany

Post Post #1097 (ISO) » Thu Jan 29, 2009 11:19 pm

Post by TDC »

Vote Countafatchic (2): Korts, insanepenguin02
insanepenguin02 (1): Adel
Adel (1): Kison

Not voting (3): Ectomancer, afatchic, ThAdmiral

Five and a half days left.
User avatar
Adel
Adel
Crystalline Logick
User avatar
User avatar
Adel
Crystalline Logick
Crystalline Logick
Posts: 6743
Joined: May 23, 2007
Location: Central Oregon / High Desert

Post Post #1098 (ISO) » Thu Jan 29, 2009 11:22 pm

Post by Adel »

Korts wrote:Adel, can you give me a quick rundown of why IP is the optimal lynch now?
1. claimed vanilla
2. isn't a powerrole
3. ain't going to be killed by the mafia if he is town
4. newbie card has to expire before lylo
5. low risk lynch choice
User avatar
Korts
Korts
Luddite
User avatar
User avatar
Korts
Luddite
Luddite
Posts: 5752
Joined: January 1, 2008
Location: HUN BUD

Post Post #1099 (ISO) » Thu Jan 29, 2009 11:39 pm

Post by Korts »

Fair enough, I'll bite.

unvote, vote: insanepenguin
scumchat never die

Return to “Completed Mini Normal Games”