Mini 735 - Bad Times In Kuribonia- Game over!

[Kieraen]

I wish to dissuade you from this TOVARISH. Maybe he will stop his jack assing around. I want some explanations, before we have a quicklynch. We have plenty of time for day one and I intend to use it.

However I will maintain my vote. L-2 seems reasonable. And I still fail to see what explaination could explain his erratic play.

in summary, I think he probably will be lynched as I cant see any decent explanation for his behaviour but agree with TING's attitude of slowplaying and keeping our options open for now.

[ting =)]

It's relevant because scummy as Reecer might look, we only have 5 pages worth of info on everyone else. I

hate

long days, but if we're going to catch scum; we'll need more info than that I think.

[Kieraen]

@TING

Please allow me to defend myself. What is it about my reaction that you find discomforting?

[ting =)]

Oh, post 126 is to Tov's 124. I simulposted with Kier.

@Kier.
There's nothing to defend really. You just sounded more heated in the previous page than I'd expect, that's all.

[Kieraen]

Okay just covering bases. Made me sound suspicious.

[houseofcards]

guys sorry i havent posted, my internet was down, and couldnt get it back up cause school, so /unvote, because to close to lynch

[qwints]

For the record, Reeser's evasiveness is extremely scummy and I support a lynch. I'm not going to vote at this time to avoid a quick lynch, so

FOS: Reeser

[MonkeyMan576]

I agree there's nothing to be gained by a quick lynch. Might as well look for more scum.

Unvote
Vote: Prof. Guppy

Lurking

[QueenofHearts]

To Qanqan, thanks for the birthday greeting! (May have done a little to much wine)

@ Reecer, like most everyone else, I too would like a defensive explanation and not necessarily a quick lynching. However, until there is an explanation my vote stands.

[12]

For the record, Reeser's evasiveness is extremely scummy and I support a lynch. I'm not going to vote at this time to avoid a quick lynch, so

FOS: Reeser

Four days and that's all you have to say? I find that a bit odd. Would you care to take a look at the rest of the game?


Other than this, I agree with the general sentiment that we don’t have much information on anyone, making a lynch decision unwise at this point. While I wouldn’t condone Kiearan’s affinity for capitals and spitfire, neither of these things point to scumminess. It can certainly be said, however, that he is quick to accuse, but that may be nothing more than fanaticism.

Oh, and I have a Y chromosome, for future pronoun reference.

[Prof. Guppy]

I agree there's nothing to be gained by a quick lynch. Might as well look for more scum.

Unvote
Vote: Prof. Guppy

Getting a full eight hours of sleep like a sane person should.

Fixed.

I'm not getting a clear read on Reccer. He's not scummy, he's just stupid. Right now I'm think Tovarish is scum, for votehopping.

[MonkeyMan576]

I agree there's nothing to be gained by a quick lynch. Might as well look for more scum.

Unvote
Vote: Prof. Guppy

Getting a full eight hours of sleep like a sane person should.

Fixed.

I'm not getting a clear read on Reccer. He's not scummy, he's just stupid. Right now I'm think Tovarish is scum, for votehopping.

Here is your post history so far...

4 - confirm
22 - refuse to random vote
46 - refuse to vote for Tovarish, "enough votes already"
78 - Denies lurking charges
92 - Asks what the "law of DNFTT" is.
96 - Asks for a vote count
106 - Advises reecer not to roleclaim.
135 - Claims "reccer not scummy, just stupid"

basically you've gone out of your way to avoid saying anything substantial, and you're defending reecer. That's enough to make me think you might be scum.

[Prof. Guppy]

basically you've gone out of your way to avoid saying anything substantial, and you're defending reecer. That's enough to make me think you might be scum.

Okay, I concede these points. But you must remember that townies also act scummy every once in a while.

[Tovarish]

That's your defense? Wow, you're no better than reecer, just asking us not to lynch him on trust. And how am I scummy again?

[MonkeyMan576]

So I guess our strategy, should be to avoid lynching people based on scummy behavior:sarcasm:.

[Reecer6]

I'm thinking that MonkeyMan is innocent, Not going to tell you why though. (Role Revealing.)
And I forgot if I have a current vote, so if I do,

unvote

.

[qwints]

Oh come on. There's only one town role that could know he was innocent. The fact that you're not claiming mason right now has drawn my vote. (Note that this only puts him at L-2)

vote: Reecer6

[Reecer6]

I'm not going to be claiming ANYTHING!

[12]

Oh come on. There's only one town role that could know he was innocent. The fact that you're not claiming mason right now has drawn my vote. (Note that this only puts him at L-2)

vote: Reecer6

You've ignored most of the game thus far, and now you've added this flimsy argument on top of that? He said he

thinks

and added '(role revealing)' for (likely false) credibility. I'm flagging you here because you seem to have gone unnoticed by most of the players. I don't have anything close to a basis for an accusation, but I'm a bit suspicious.

[ting =)]

Reecer, you're at L-2. You

should

claim. There's no good reason you shouldn't. If you're town, your death would hurt us, a claim would be your best bet to stay alive since you're obviously not defending yourself. The reason people wagon to L-2 is to get someone to claim. You're at L-2. Claim.

[Polymorph]

Reecer, in your last post, you stated that you were not going to be claiming anything, yet in your previous statement you said that you were going to reveal your role. Why are you being contradictory? It's not making the case against you any easier.

[Polymorph]

EBWOP: My bad, I interpreted that wrong. My previous post is invalid now. Pay no attention to it.

[Prof. Guppy]

That's your defense? Wow, you're no better than reecer, just asking us not to lynch him on trust. And how am I scummy again?

You've gone from picking on Kieran, to picking on reccer, to picking on me. I get the feeling you just want somebody lynched, and you don't bloody care who. You tell me why that's not scummy.

[Qanqan]

Ok, I do think Prof. Guppy has been quite suspicious, in a sense. He has been lurking, and defending Reecer. However, I checked his past games, it seems lurking is just what he does... (oh btw, ambiguous question to anyone, is checking peoples' past games poor sportsmanship?)

... But monkeyman, so far on posts 23, 49, 72, 132 and 136 you have attempted to force suspicion on others, by using sometimes flimsy logic to make agressive accusations in hopes of a bandwagon. In posts 59, 61 and 139 (and others) you have twisted words, by making them mean something they don't. E.g.

So I guess our strategy, should be to avoid lynching people based on scummy behavior:sarcasm:.

Prof. Guppy was saying that all townies make suspicious sounding comments every one and a while, which is true, half of the players so far have said something 'scummy', and I'm pretty sure there isn't 6 Mafia (That would be scary). But your comment is borderline irrelevant, and is arguing againts something he basically didn't even say.

Don't get me wrong, I think Prof. Guppy is suspicious, I am

not

defending him (or not trying to), he would probably be the 3rd person I would vote for, right after you.

And technically, in your attempt to get Prof. Guppy lynched, you're defending Reecer. If that doesn't scream mafia, I don't know what does.

[ting =)]

oh btw, ambiguous question to anyone, is checking peoples' past games poor sportsmanship?

No. There is nothing wrong with finding out someone's meta.