You attack puppies and you attack me, sir. DIE.Darox wrote:Kittens beat every other fluffy animal in existence when it comes to cuteness. Nothing that cute couldeverbe scum. They are especially cuter than puppies.
most likely just modlulzelvis_knits wrote:You attack puppies and you attack me, sir. DIE.Darox wrote:Kittens beat every other fluffy animal in existence when it comes to cuteness. Nothing that cute couldeverbe scum. They are especially cuter than puppies.
Also, what just happened with the orange juice?
I'm selling, obv. As I've said before, I don't know what it does and I can't say much else, but it will help me if you buy it so it's a case of believing that I'm town.destructor wrote:Also, wer hat die Limonade? Ich interessiere mich für den Kauf einigen können, wenn Sie mir sagen, warum ich es wollen.
This is suspicious. Taunting is yet again not a scummy activity on its own, and you're "glad this is helping the town" schtick has an awfully fake ring to it. Seems like you're hurriedly trying to cover your tracks after getting called out for your previous post. That said, it worries me somewhat that a suspicious player would be the one who is most eager to buy my lemonade. Not sure what to conclude from that...SlySly wrote:Well, seeing how there are multiple players doing it, and I don't understand what any of them are saying, it is hard to narrow it down to one.
It is good to see that my foreign language stance has sparked a little conversation. Hopefully, we can sniff out some scum in the process.
Post restriction is one thing, but Imaginality taunting me with it is another. I seriously doubt that there is a clause in his role that says he must immediately taunt anyone who calls the foreign languages scummy.
I agree, in essence; I don't see why knowing I'm town (if you're scum) would make you want to buy lemonade. Unless, that is, you are scum and know the lemonade gives the scum super powers or something. I think the lemonade is unlikely to do that; moreover, I think the scum are unlikely actually to know what the lemonade does. But this still causes me to pause for thought regarding Sly's scumminess. That said, I still require it to be bought...Kmd4390 wrote:And I think the only way scum would be more willing to buy lemonade is if Caf is scum with them and they talked about his role. I think if Caf is town, the scum would be just as cautious as us, if not more cautious.
ok, here's who I see defending kmd and how:elvis_knits wrote:COW - why is isaac scummier than any of hte other people who defended kmd? plum did... I think I did sort of even.
Isacc wrote:I think dahill is taking this out of hand. I wasn't particularly worried about the vote at all (it was in the random vote stage, who cared?). Dahill, you ask about a random vote, and then start getting suspicious when his explanation isn't to your liking? Duh his explanation isn't complex or anything more than "I just did," and why? Because it was the random voting phase.
Three posts ago, I wasn't really concerned and was just going to say "I didn't find it odd," but now dahill has voted over this? What the heck? There is no case being made, this vote is based on a person's explanation for a random vote?
Because that's not the emphasis of the argument, as far as I can tell. I see you saying it, but the main point that I see is that he was attacking the explanation of a random vote too much.Isacc wrote:Has, did you read the second paragraph you JUST quoted? "There is no case being made." So basically, you say you don't see my argument WHEN IT'S THERE WORD FOR WORD? What the heck?
Because it's only there so we can get out of it.Isacc wrote:Anyways, in other news, I also want to ask Cow: why do you hate the "random vote stage" comment so much?
Kmd4390 wrote:I've seen plenty of townies push bad cases.Isacc wrote:@Dahill: Pushing a lynch on bad logic = scum.
Isacc wrote: @Kmd and Dahill: I attack bad logic. It's what I do. I blow up overreallybad logic. See all my other games (WoT, mini 772). You don't like it, sorry, but if you think it's a scumtell, you don't know me.
Kmd4390 wrote:Wow, Isacc. I didn't call you scum. I said I disagree with you on a theory point. Quick to defend yourself much?
Doesn't look like "just responding" to me. Looks like:Isacc wrote:Kmd: Am I not allowed to respond to your comments? Don't overreact, I was just responding.
This?Isacc wrote:@Has: You're taking the parts leading up to the main points, and saying they are the main points. My comments on the random vote explained why a significant case seemed lacking, so I pointed that out, and then made my final statement: there wasn't a significant case.
Also, you are STILL ignoring my defense. Paragraph 4 of post 324. Read it a few times. Now, do you have a counter-argument or are you just going to keep spouting that you're right?
Your laying off of dahill seemed a bit contrived to me. Anyway, you're not my focus right now, although you're attempting to make yourself it, which I find interesting. I really want destructor to come back and talk.Isacc wrote:Also, the claim that I was defending is bullshit. After Dahill made a case, I told him I was less suspicious, though disagreed. This makes it obvious that the lack of a case was what bothered me, not the target. If I cared about Kmd being attacked, wouldn't I have continued to defend Kmd, rather than agreeing to disagree?
A vote for me is pretty much a waste of the town's time. I have sent a copy of my claim to the mod to make sure I follow all the rules of my role. Until receiving word back from Mirth, I am not prepared to elaborate on this just yet.dahill1 wrote:actually after rereading i agree with plum
sly's actions are more voteworthy than kmd's
If it comes down to me needing to claim and Mirth approves the delivery of my claim, it will shed a little light on why I asked about your lack of fear about buying the lemonade.destructor wrote: SlySly's reaction to what I said was interesting in that he assumed I had "no fear" about buying lemonade...
Sly seemed to be alluding to me being informed or something too, which is what got to me first.
Nothing happened.destructor wrote: Sly bought some, dunno if he said anything happened yet.
Finally, a brain!!!imaginality wrote: SlySly's anti-foreign-language comment I can see more likely frustration rather than scumtell.
In some of those games I was scum, in some I was town. Mainly, the times that seem so familiar are when I was town and being mislynched since I play by my own rules and everyone seems to think that equates to scum. Feel free to meta my games, you will see how often I have been mislynched. It is not at all surprising to me that there is a baseless bandwagon forming on me in this game already.elvis_knits wrote: Were you scum in those games? Are you saying kmd is acting the way you act as scum, or are you saying that other people have gotten away with attacks like this on you whether or not you have been scum?
Following "usually scum" ideologies with Sly often results in a mislynch. Meta if you feel the need.elvis_knits wrote: Personally, I think someone who calls another person "overdefensive" is usually scum.
Give me a break!!! It is much more difficult to hide scummy messages in a picture of a kitten than it is to embed a message in a language that you assume no one understands. I used to work at a place and this lady would come in and tell her kids in spanish to spread out and help each other steal things while she distracted me.elvis_knits wrote: And why aren't you objecting to the gratuitous posting of kittens? Maybe all the people posting kittens are scummy. OMG KITTENS ARE TEH SCUMZORZEZ!
Sorry, I am the shit. Sorry if the truth hurts you. My posting is pretty much what kicked this game into overdrive and I am being bandwagoned for it as usual.elvis_knits wrote: I HATE when people do that. Say somehting scummy and then be all like "I was trying to start some conversation duuuuudes, and it worked so I'm the shit."
I wanted to see if Glork had noticed something that I hadn't. What is your fascination with finding out who would win in any given conflict and how do any of the results help the town find scum? Your posting so far has seemed to be nothing more than 'confusion stew' to me.Darox wrote: On other note, Sly, why haven't you shared your ideas about darox? Why did you need Glorken's reasons beforehand?
Taunting is taunting, not scummy. Taunting is more assholeness than scuminess. If you choose to be a taunter in a bastitch modded game, I think it wise to be careful who you taunt.caf19 wrote: This is suspicious. Taunting is yet again not a scummy activity on its own, and you're "glad this is helping the town" schtick has an awfully fake ring to it. Seems like you're hurriedly trying to cover your tracks after getting called out for your previous post.
I really don't like this for some reason.SlySly wrote:A vote for me is pretty much a waste of the town's time. I have sent a copy of my claim to the mod to make sure I follow all the rules of my role. Until receiving word back from Mirth, I am not prepared to elaborate on this just yet.dahill1 wrote:actually after rereading i agree with plum
sly's actions are more voteworthy than kmd's
I suggest that those voting for me look elsewhere for scum and quit wasting time on me.
Sly wrote:Following "usually scum" ideologies with Sly often results in a mislynch. Meta if you feel the need.elvis_knits wrote: Personally, I think someone who calls another person "overdefensive" is usually scum.