Regarding the claimed PGO, I have only seen that role once:
Mafia 84
This was a large normal. The claim is made at the first page. And if you look at the end of this game, you can see that the claimed player survived till the end, and was eventually a PGO. This is the only example I could find with a PGO.
Charter, you also mentioned a game with a PGO in it. Could you give a link to that game?
@Lynx
Lynx wrote:The quick hammer by Xdaamno was extremely Scummy. FOS:Xdaamno Definitely want some answers on this vote. However, I am keeping in mind the fact that Xdaamno hasn't really been involved in the game. I think carelessness could be the major cause of his vote. He hasn't seemed to pay much attention to the game. Certainly doesn't excuse a vote of such magnitude though.
Lynx wrote:Also, Unvote, Vote:Xdaamno
He hastily jumped on the Artem wagon with no analysis or evidence of his own(For the hammer vote nonetheless). He's contributed nothing to the active scumhunting and given no case for any of his votes. Just shown little activity, but is still obviously here.
The first quote can be found in post 126. The second in post 171. Can you explain why the sudden switch?
@post 127
The player has changed, but the allignment hasn't. If the first player was suspicious, then you should use those arguments against the replacement as well. So it's fair.
However, to me it's a null tell. I've seen players who asked for replacement after they got FoSes or votes against them, and some of them turned up town.
@post 140
We asked if Xdaamno knew that he was the hammerer. He's asking if anyone expected him to say yes.
Is it just me, or did nobody respond to post 142 (except Artem with his claim)?
And yeah, I also have some difficulties in believing Xdaamno that he didn't know. Especially as there was a VC count on the page where he voted. And now that he has explained his 'reason' for voting Artem, I really don't like it.
@Artem
As already explained, I voted you as you were doing the same thing you voted Artifex for. If you find that scummy, why do it yourself? And that you didn't vote Charter as it would make you a hypocrite. Those were my reasons for voting you.
Darox wrote:I'm not going to debate how likely the mod is to include a PGO because thats just playing with mod WIFOM
This
@post 151
As already mentioned, there was a VC on top of the page where you 'voted' Artem. Strange that you didn't pay much attention towards the VC when you wanted to apply pressure, not?
@post 153
I also got the wrong impression like Charter about your 'saved' comment and I'm also wondering how you could miss the VC. Perhaps it's not that easy to understand, as we're not as great as you (
), so can you please answer the questions from post 152?
MR, can you next time let Xdaamno respond first?
Posts 166 and 168. You are exactly doing of what you accuse Lynx off. Besides, in post 168, you already give Lynx a way out of your attacks.
I really want an explanation about post 172.
@post 183
Xdaamno wrote:I also call bullshit on "contributed nothing" and "given no case".
Where's the evidence for this? Especially, the second part.
Having seen all of this:
FoS Xdaamno
FoS Master Ruck