OhGodMyLife 1 - (Cephrir)
Cephrir 4 - (OhGodMyLife, Qwints, Jazzmyn, Corvuus)
Apothecary 1 - (MacavityLock)
Not voting 3 - (Apothecary, Elmo, LLamaFluff)
With nine players alive, it takes five votes to lynch.
I agree but I still would like qwints to elaborate a bit on his vote, maybe give some thoughts on something apart from a one liner on Ceph. I keep trying to figure something out and there is just a piece missing.OhGodMyLife wrote:Now is a good time for ceph to be lynched.
ML comes off as scummy mostly due to two things, firstly the way he played the SC wagon during D1. I dont think was ever actually a part of the wagon vote wise, but there were comments (like his 33) that make me think otherwise. When the SC wagon came to a head near the end of the day, he stayed off it and continued to push the Apoc wagon which was the only other viable one. It seems like he made his mark on the SC wagon but chose not to cash in it.Elmo wrote:LF, why do you think Macavity's scum(my)? What's your opinion of Atlas - not the role i.e. Qwints, the posts made by the player Atlas previously? Also.. why llama fluff?
You're correct that I was never on the SC wagon vote-wise. Early in the day, I had some suspicions, but he was never at the top of my list. Over the course of page 14, my suspicions spiked due to his voting and subsequent unvoting of Ythill. I also did not like 337 at all. He was then at L-1, so being on his wagon with a vote would have meant a hammer, which I was not willing to do at that point. He then claimed doc, and I backed off like everybody else did.LlamaFluff wrote:ML comes off as scummy mostly due to two things, firstly the way he played the SC wagon during D1. I dont think was ever actually a part of the wagon vote wise, but there were comments (like his 33) that make me think otherwise. When the SC wagon came to a head near the end of the day, he stayed off it and continued to push the Apoc wagon which was the only other viable one. It seems like he made his mark on the SC wagon but chose not to cash in it.
My Apoth suspicions, which were stronger than my MM suspicions, from day 1 remain. There was no trading of MM to Apoth involved. As I detailed in my long post, I don't see why SC-scum prevents Apoth from being his buddy, and I think that might be a dangerous assumption to make.LlamaFluff wrote:Second would be the early push for Apoc today. I really dont see Apoc flipping scum after the strength that SC pushed for that lynch when there was a town wagon available in Ythill, and the MM wagon which both seemed to hold water. Also most of the posts from ML yesterday seemed to suggest a SC-MM pairing more then anything else, so trading MM for Apoc today when SC was proven scum looks wierd.
He's finally willing to do some work when it will succeed in confirming him townCephrir wrote: That SC wagon looks better every minute. Actually,Vote: SC. His most recent few posts have really sealed it for me, and now he's backing off Ythill which seems to me like a total cop-out to the accusation of his rapidly changing suspicions (which, incidentally, is not a bad tell IMO). Note that this is a L-1 vote.
Maybe a null tell, but it strikes me as a little scummy to not give reasons for an Apoth lynch.Cephrir wrote:I went away this weekend and nothing happened. Yay, I guess.
Is that L-1? I'm willing to hammer, I'm done with both Apoth and this day.
And this is scummy how?qwints wrote:Cephrir
1) Voted w/o reason to get a reaction
I don't recall ever thinking he was scum. Obnoxious but never lynchworthy.2) Pulled an about face on Primate
so sick of this.3) Repeatedly says he has already given reasons w/o elaboration
How on earth would that confirm me town?See his post that before the SC claimHe's finally willing to do some work when it will succeed in confirming him townCephrir wrote: That SC wagon looks better every minute. Actually,Vote: SC. His most recent few posts have really sealed it for me, and now he's backing off Ythill which seems to me like a total cop-out to the accusation of his rapidly changing suspicions (which, incidentally, is not a bad tell IMO). Note that this is a L-1 vote.
I believe I had previously. Making sure it's OK to hammer is not a tell, I always do it.See also his post asking permission to hammer Apoth:Maybe a null tell, but it strikes me as a little scummy to not give reasons for an Apoth lynch.Cephrir wrote:I went away this weekend and nothing happened. Yay, I guess.
Is that L-1? I'm willing to hammer, I'm done with both Apoth and this day.
I'm trying to defend, at least a little. But I think it's pretty damn obvious I'm going to be lynched today.His refusal to defend and unvote of OGML are further evidence for me.
Exactly... Hence my difficulty coming up with any suspects.Elmo wrote:I'm also pretty sure I have far too many town reads at this point.
Let's look at the record.Cephrir wrote: I don't recall ever thinking [Primate] was scum. Obnoxious but never lynchworthy.
followed byCephrir wrote: @Primate voters: even if Primate is faking a PR, I don't think it's scummy. Antitown, perhaps, but not scummy. And I'm far from positive that he's making it up anyway.
ANDCephrir wrote:Unvote, Vote: Primatebecause stop.
You were putting pressure on Primate and suddenly backed off.Cephrir wrote:If you're giving up, I will as well. I was hoping if we got enough votes on Primate he would give it up, but if the wagon's greatest supporter is going to jump ship it'll never work.
Unvote.
I want you to explain why the specific instance of him voting without a reason is scummy.qwints wrote:1) Voted w/o reason to get a reaction
2) Pulled an about face on Primate
3) Repeatedly says he has already given reasons w/o elaboration
If I remember correctly, part of the stated case against him was his OGML vote. Why is his unvoting OGML scummy?qwints wrote:His refusal to defend and unvote of OGML are further evidence for me.
Cephrir wrote:If you've read this thread then you saw a case against MM.