Veerus is absolutely correct in 1015.
Shadowgirl in 1016 is also correct.
@Xyl in 1017: I said that my win con did not actually exist when I made my amended claim. I just want Mao dead so that I can see what my powers do.
DGB is still missing the point entirely in 1019.
@dahill in 1020: I believe I already mentioned that my ultimate was fake, and that it was actually the reason that everyone got 2 actions Twilight 2. Can people please read my posts instead of just automatically assuming that I haven't said anything but "I lied"?
@Seraphim in 1021: Then Whack-a-mole me and find out. I have nothing to gain from lying about alignment when an in thread investigation is currently available and known to all players.
@Vi in 1022: I figured that if I just told you guys that you had to massclaim to activate my win con, then no one would ever massclaim. So in making up a pro-town ultimate I assumed that it would be much easier to convince the town to massclaim, and would also function as a gambit to show that people resisting the massclaim would likely be scum who were worried about being targeted (Kinetic was caught here). I didn't realize until after the claim that it lowered my survival rate to nearly 0 because the scum would kill me.
Shadowgirl is still correct in 1023.
DGB needs to learn to take her own advice in 1025. I currently think she is scum with the way she is pushing this waste of a lynch so hard.
Vi is correct in 1026.
DGB is still being foolish in 1027. The extent of my lying was moving my win con to the place of my ultimate condition, making up a new win con, and making up a new ultimate. All three of these things boil down to a single lie because they serve towards the same purpose, to make a massclaim more likely.
Kinetic-scum is agreeing with his buddy DGB in 1030, and is just as wrong.
@DGB in 1031: Then why the hell aren't you pushing for my investigation? Seems to me that if you think this is the case and you are town then you would want to be sure you are correct before advocating a lynch based off of it.
Vi agrees with both DGB and Kinetic, but has been acting in a mostly rational way towards the situation. I'm thinking misguided by DGB's rabid irrational attacks, but not scum.
@Stef in 1033: If you don't buy my win con claim, then why not look for the proof. I honestly do not understand why you people don't understand this. I have made a completely proveable claim, and because of that you say you don't believe me and should therefore lynch me instead of finding out if I'm actually lying? That makes no logical sense.
@Stef in 1034: Ok. Did you miss the part about Xyl being given info by the mod that I had used a Dreams of Reality action? That supports my claim.
@Xyl in 1037: Or perhaps I am actually telling the truth and you should be more concerned with finding that out (by allowing me to prove it) than wasting a lynch on me. And, as I have said many, many times by now, if you think I am scum, then just use the investigation on me to prove that I am telling the truth.
@DGB in 1038: You have nothing to gain by keeping me alive? How about the ability to prove I'm not lying? How about avoiding a wasted lynch? How about removing me from the game anyway in three Days.
And what about things you have to lose by lynching me now? For example, a free lynch for the scum, giving them a free NK.
I'm going to bold this because people do not seem to be reading my posts.
My claim is completely proveable. If I am lying, then meeting my win con will cause me to leave the game. If I do not do this, then I was lying, and am therefore scum/anti-town.
Also, if you are so damn worried about me being scum who lied, then whack-a-mole me to find out.
Because, no matter how you dress it up, that's what the world is. A community of idiots doing a series of things until the world explodes and we all die.
.
)