In post 816, gob wrote: Ninja can i get a reads list with every explanation being 1-2 sentences?
You requested a reads list, I gave it in Post 909.
Any thoughts / feedback on it?
In post 816, gob wrote: Ninja can i get a reads list with every explanation being 1-2 sentences?
In post 1128, Grackaroni wrote: In general I associate sustained activity over long periods of time as much harder for mafia than town, so that will impact my reads.
I'd be curious if people on this site agree with that?
Depends, they post more on a need to basis. When threatened by votes that can change.In post 1128, Grackaroni wrote: In general I associate sustained activity over long periods of time as much harder for mafia than town, so that will impact my reads.
I'd be curious if people on this site agree with that?
In post 1132, Dannflor wrote: only town can post on this page
I could literally make up reasons and give 3 random reasons if I wanted to as scum. I don't have many scumreads. If that's a problem for you, too bad. I'm being honest and if you want to vote me for being honest then do so.In post 1031, SuperfluousNinja wrote:In post 980, Hu Tao wrote:Could be scum upset that a townie is being townread unjustlyIn post 979, Oatsmaster wrote: Not really sure why ninja seems to be upset with the concept of meta
They posted again about 20 minutes after I asked, so yes, they were here and following along at the time.
Is it really just Dunnstral and myself that think they're suspicious? Nobody else?
I think he's town though. I liked how he picked out posts to discern my alignment, I think it was genuine understanding.In post 1138, outoforder wrote: I will start then.
Grack.
There are things that bother me a lot in his game. First of all it's quite hard to do catch up like that with keeping your story straight. Especially as mafia.
There is the post where Luca claims he thinks the interaction with Oats and Roden is S/S. Grack agrees with that, because it looks bizarre.
But after all the opinion actually is that Oats is town and Roden is not.
Then he suspects me and you (Vivax).
Then there is like sudden change in everything. Suddenly Roden doesn't look like mafia anymore. Suddenly Vivax doesn't look like mafia anymore. Suddenly Luca looks like mafia.
Notice that I am the only person ever in this game before Vivax just while ago to suspect Luca at any level. He doesn't have anything to say about his read on me.
Also he doesn't have anything to say about my post here:
Spoiler:
As knowing me, Vivax, Oats and DP, regardless of if Grack thinks i am correct, incorrect or whatever here, this should be imo the most interesting post in the game to him, especially since he apparently suspects me. Alarm bells are ringing as he just comments absolutely nothing about it.
In this post again I find it odd that Oats is someone Luca isn't that confident about. If Oats and Roden fought it out so early and Roden is his confident scumread, I believe he should be more opinionated on Oats as well and offer some kind of interpretation to the arguments between them.In post 993, Luca Blight wrote: Having caught up, I'm starting to town-lean Vivax again based on his recent posts. I just think if he's scum then he's making life unnecessarily difficult for himself.
I have a soft town-lean on Gob, which perhaps I will elaborate on earlier.
Dann and ninja are still clearly town
Outoforder is most probably town too
I think Oats and Darth punk are town, but am less confident
Then comes Gob and Dunn, who are soft Town-leans. Maybe Grackaroni too, but I need to see more.
The only clear scumread I have right now is Roden. The other slots haven't left much of an impression on me yet.
This is not very townie.In post 281, Roden wrote: I'm mainly just fucking with Oats for being unnecessarily unhelpful and rude
I do genuinely think he's scum for his faux outrage though, and his attempts to discredit me aren't helping
Over the top omgus?In post 276, Roden wrote:Ok, found the second scumIn post 274, Luca Blight wrote:In post 271, Roden wrote: Then vote Oats
I'd rather vote you, as I don't believe the way you're portraying your view of the game to be real. It's feels as if you're overcompensating.
I don't have much more to say about those twoIn post 947, gob wrote: Hmm Roden, tell me more about your thoughts on Oatsmaster and SuperNinja.
Also, do you not want to go Vivax today?
Right. Why does town think scum has a "rock-solid opinion"? Scum just lies.In post 954, Dunnstral wrote: Roden she said you used language that makes it seem like you have a rock-solid opinion.
well he is saying youre scum so what gives?In post 1144, Roden wrote:I don't have much more to say about those twoIn post 947, gob wrote: Hmm Roden, tell me more about your thoughts on Oatsmaster and SuperNinja.
Also, do you not want to go Vivax today?
Correct, I don't want to vote Vivax. He's a strong player who shrouds himself under the guise of "lol random" humor. I think it's really easy to want to vote him for being different, and I remember last time I rolled scum against him our team was trying to make him lim bait, but he actually ended up with some of the more accurate reads of the town. So I'm currently just paying attention to what he says and giving him time to cook.
???In post 955, SuperfluousNinja wrote:In post 942, Roden wrote: I'm not meeting you on uneven ground. This is a very manipulative post to make in response and just confirms my suspicions of what you were doing. I repeatedly explained the reasoning behind my interactions with Oats, and you've repeatedly chosen to ignore it and assign context and intentions that are not actually there.
Again, I'd like to see actual things I have said that you characterize as "assigning context and intentions that are not actually there". Like please show me some things I have said, show quotes, be more specific than this. I'm not going to take this claim from you seriously until you've actually demonstrated that I have done this. I really do not think you're describing the situation accurately, andI am leaving the ball in your court to prove otherwise.I am not actively trying to influence you in any way here, other than to request that you do a little bit more work to actually prove your point.
You are putting in effort to convince ME that my own thoughts were not real.
That is such an incredibly unfair way of characterizing it. There's a difference between me saying "I don't believe that your thoughts and intentions are genuine" and me directly influencing YOU to believe that your own thoughts are not actually genuine.
And attempting to make it about you when I called you out on it (finding it to be "serious on a personal level") is a trademark gaslighter tactic.
This is getting WAY too personal and I'm going to ask you to stop. Like for real if you're doubling down on this, then I think what I'd like to do is defer to the mod and ask if they think I'm gaslighting you, because THATISEXTREMELY SERIOUS. If I were actually doing that, if I were actually trying to psychologically manipulate you in this way, that's something that I should be modkilled before. I REALLY, REALLY do not think that is what I am doing, but if it is, I'm going to defer to the mod and to some higher level of judgment, because you are making this about a lot more than just a game when you accuse me of this.
Since when? He's been town reading me this entire game.In post 1146, outoforder wrote:well he is saying youre scum so what gives?In post 1144, Roden wrote:I don't have much more to say about those twoIn post 947, gob wrote: Hmm Roden, tell me more about your thoughts on Oatsmaster and SuperNinja.
Also, do you not want to go Vivax today?
Correct, I don't want to vote Vivax. He's a strong player who shrouds himself under the guise of "lol random" humor. I think it's really easy to want to vote him for being different, and I remember last time I rolled scum against him our team was trying to make him lim bait, but he actually ended up with some of the more accurate reads of the town. So I'm currently just paying attention to what he says and giving him time to cook.
Dissecting a post =/= actually deconstructing an argumentIn post 702, SuperfluousNinja wrote:In post 699, Oatsmaster wrote:Like why would he pick a fight with a lengthy response type of person who isn't afraid to get their hands dirty?
Considering you gave him a solid townread in that list post, doesn’t seem like this is true.
I guess I just don't really follow what you're saying here. What is the connection between the general assumption that scum wouldn't want to stir shit up with a lengthy response type of person and my town read on Dann? Like why isn't the conclusion just that this makes Dann less likely to be scum?
Scumdann just cares about looking townie, he doesn’t really care who dies. That case has everyone thinking he’s town. Not really sure why this is some super unlikely scenario.
Like from your perspective, this dude just spent a bunch of time casing you and immediately after you responded he just dropped it and went for someone else. Doesn’t really seem like he was invested in his read.
I like to think the reason he gave it up so fast was because I did such a great job of deconstructing his argument. Consider that I was able to go through each and every word he wrote and explained all of it thoroughly. You could have broken everything he wrote and everything I wrote into like 20-30 posts of this site's seemingly average length, and then it would magically look less like he just abandoned it real quick and more like he actually followed through on his suspicions, and yet the actual content of everything that was said would still be exactly the same. Everyone is free to re-read my response as many times as they like; I don't think anyone should come away from such an exercise thinking that he still had a good argument there. I think THAT is why he gave it up. The timeline of it isn't the interesting part of the story.
Seems like from your perspective he did it to look townie and once that objective was achieved he moved on.
This is just conjecture. It could seem like that, sure, but is that what actually happened? This isn't a convincing argument for anything.