So you admit to all the points.armlx wrote:I'm lazy.1. Even better to look it up yourself. Shouldn't cost that much time. Also I find it a bit exaggerated that you would 'look like an idiot' and I fail to see how that would even matter to someone who is pro-town.Nothing I guess.2. What stopped you from voting in this post?
So well yeah,
-------------------------------------------------------------
This discussion was interesting but it ended prematurely. Natirasha, why do you think it's so obvious that one of the supposed powers is not to be a miller?GhostWriter wrote:This, in no way, seems obvious to me. It is, in fact, far closer to a stretch to cover oneself, than anything else.Natirasha wrote:It's simple in my eyes. In a game where people gain powers as they answer questions correctly, it seems extremely obvious that one of our supposed "powers" is to not be a miller.Axelrod wrote: Of course, Nat. just said the same thing abo9ut two Millers. So, question to both of you: what is it about this set-up that leads you to the conclusion that there could be multiple millers?
This is also a very interesting discussion during twilight:
----------------------------------------------------------------------Axelrod wrote:This comes across as somewhat insincere, considering you apparently had no problems at all putting him at L-1.Natirasha wrote:I'm not entirely sure I want to go to night yet.malthusis wrote:Why are you worrying about not hammering Der Hammer?...damn.
And you also didn't say anything else, like, "hay guys, this is L-1, but I'm not really sure I want to go to Night yet...."
Animorpherv1
105
Later turns out neither of them did (why wouldn't you check).animorpherv1 wrote: Sure. So, there are 2 people thinking there are millers, and I think Nat and Der Hammer both adapted the idea of there being Death millers.
Why would you try to make a reread of the miller claims... without actually reading. 'I think they both claimed miller and then iirc suddenly out of nowhere they were like death miller I think?My first thought "Death millers? Scum." I think they are talking about themselves as being "death millers" aka scum.
If I have this right, Nat claimed stoner, aka miller. Of course, all miller claims are impossible to verify if you don't get them lynched, but if I'm correct, they thought about in the same 2 pages, then they mere just "There is probably a death miller" for the rest of the game. This came out of nowhere, so I am accusing them of being scum.
So he thinks that both Nat and DH claimed death miller. Ani, why did you choose to vote DH over Nat at this point?unvote, vote: Der Hammerbecause the death miller thing is a out there, and a something I think only scum would say there is, to get themself out of trouble of they need it.
He already claimed at the time...I'll bet that if Der Hammer claims, he'll claim miller or death miller.
107
Still he didn't check?animorpherv1 wrote: My fault. I thought you did. I know Der Hammer did that though.
111
So, he admits his accusations were false but he doesn't unvote him? And then he comes up with another reason to be voting him, namely that he wasn't posting much. So essentially that is now his only reason to be voting DH, and lurkerlynch=poop.animorpherv1 wrote:@ DerHammer- your right. False accusations., I am sorry, however, you don't seem to be posting much. I'd like to see some more activity from you.
...@ malthusis- because they may be talking about themself, and Death Miller is something that scum may claim. Altough I'd doubt they would, it's a possibility.
This needs no further explanation other than that it doesn't really look like a very solid case.
------------------------------------
Now I'll further analyze the DH bandwagon.
#123 - Electra votes DH for similarity in role names. No alarm bells, sounds pretty reasonable.
#131 - axel votes DH for the same reason as electra... except how can he know Electras role. anyway, this still doesn't ring bells.
#135 - tbh I don't really agree with the reasoning. the reason I don't agree is that students usually don't like students who kiss up to the teacher, and the kissing up student may be wanting to expell them.
#136 well yeah... I'll call this the point of no return, he basically sealed his fate here.
#138 - vote after the point of no return
#139
#143 - vote after the point of no return
#148 - vote after the point of no return, this was a hammer even though he didn't know it himself
Oh, and we shouldn't forget my case on animorpher from early day 1.
1. Claiming without reasoning.
2. Saying that the claim was a plain mistake, implying we should get over it.
3. "It looks to me as if your trying to get me lynched.", while I wasn't voting for him at the time. In fact, that statement in itself is scummy enough, anyone is able to see that.
4. Playing the newbie card.
5. Tries to make a case of DH while not even reading the thread, this also included some elements of bad logic and his case did not look sincere.
Liking my day 1 vote.